본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인 중‧상위 학습자들의 n-gram 비교분석

The Comparison of N-gram Use between Intermediate and Advanced Korean Learners of English

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of the study is to analyse Korean learners’ N-gram use between intermediate and advanced English learners. Since the use of N-gram is considered to be one of the key elements to present learners’ fluent language use, it is often discussed to judge language normality. In particular, the study is focused on different or similar use of N-gram in terms of learners’ level of language use. To this end, two kinds of Korean learner corpora (intermediate vs. advanced) are used to investigate a particular pattern from the two perspectives (grammatical and functional) and compare it with that of native learner corpus (LOCNESS). The results of study show that first, both Korean learners overuse a simplified grammatical pattern (NP+Verb: we should think about). This pattern is also distinctive between intermediate and advanced learners. Second, from the functional viewpoint, they have different patterns in the categories of Stance and Referential comparing to those of native learners.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyse Korean learners’ N-gram use between intermediate and advanced English learners. Since the use of N-gram is considered to be one of the key elements to present learners’ fluent language use, it is often discussed to judge language normality. In particular, the study is focused on different or similar use of N-gram in terms of learners’ level of language use. To this end, two kinds of Korean learner corpora (intermediate vs. advanced) are used to investigate a particular pattern from the two perspectives (grammatical and functional) and compare it with that of native learner corpus (LOCNESS). The results of study show that first, both Korean learners overuse a simplified grammatical pattern (NP+Verb: we should think about). This pattern is also distinctive between intermediate and advanced learners. Second, from the functional viewpoint, they have different patterns in the categories of Stance and Referential comparing to those of native learners.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Ӓdel, A., "Recurrent Word Combinations in Academic Writing by Native and Non-native Speakers of English: A Lexical Bundles Aproach", English for Specific Purposes, 31, pp.81~92 (2012)
  2. Althenberg, B., "Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications", pp.101~122 (1998), OUP
  3. Biber, D., "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Pearson
  4. Biber, D., "If You Look At...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 25(3), pp.371~405 (2004)
  5. Biber, D., "Lexical Bundles in University Spoken and Written Registers", English for Specific Purposes, 26, pp.263~286 (2007)
  6. Cavnar, W. B., "N-Gram-Based Text Categorization", Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (1994)
  7. Chen, Y-H., "Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing", Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), pp.30~49 (2010)
  8. Cheng. W., "Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency : Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams", Applied Linguistics, 30(2), pp.236~252 (2008)
  9. Cortes, V., "Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Disciplinary Writing: Examples from History and Biology", English for Specific Purpose, 23, pp.397~423 (2004)
  10. Crossley, S. A., "The Development of Lexical Bundle Accuracy and Production in English Second Language Speakers", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching, 49, pp.1~26 (2011)
  11. Granger, S, "Learner English on Computer", pp.3~18 (1998), Longman
  12. Granger, S., "Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective" (2008), Benjamins
  13. Hong, S. C., "The Pedagogical Use of Corpus Data Based on Two Case Studies: Dong-A for Korean Learners and Chemnitz for German Learners", Ph. D, pp.2009
  14. 홍신철, "EFL Learners’ Consciousness-Raising through a Corpus-Based Approach", 영어교육, 65(1), pp.57~86 (2010), 한국영어교육학회
  15. 홍신철, "An n-gram Analysis of Maritime English", 언어과학연구, 61(2), pp.283~302 (2012), 언어과학회[DOI]
  16. 홍신철, "An N-gram Analysis of Korean English Learners' Writing", 영어학, 13(2), pp.313~336 (2013), 한국영어학회
  17. Hyland, K., "As Can be Seen : Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation", English for Specific Purposes, (27), pp.4~21 (2008)
  18. Laufer, B., "Verb-noun Collocations in Second Language Writing : A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English", Language Learning, 62, pp.647~672 (2011)
  19. Nesselhauf, N., "Collocations in a Learner Corpus" (2005), John Benjamins
  20. Paquot, M., "Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.180~149 (2012)
  21. Ping, P., "A Study of the Use of Four-word Lexical Bundles in Argumentative Essays by Chinese English Majors-A Comparative Study Based on WECCL and NOCNESS", CELEA Journal, 32, pp.25~45 (2009)
  22. Simpson-Vlach, R., "An Academic Formulas List : New Methods in Phraseology Research", Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.487~512 (2010)
  23. Schmidt, R., "The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning", Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.17~46 (1990)
  24. Scott, M., (2010), Oxford University Press
  25. Sinclair, J. M., "Corpus, Concordance, Collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press
  26. Stubbs, M., "The Most Natural Thing in the World: Quantitative Data on Multi-word Sequences in English", Phraseology 2005 (2005)
  27. Wray, A., "Formulaic Language : Pushing the Boundaries" (2008), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)