본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on Korean English Learners’ Use of English Contrastive Discourse Markers

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aimed to explore Korean English learners’ use of English contrastive discourse markers (CDMs) through the comparison with use of native English speakers under the frame of Fraser’s CDM model. Sixty-five undergraduate students (48 Korean English learners and 17 native English speakers) participated in the study and completed two tasks (i.e. test for ability to use English CDMs and English CDM preference questionnaire). One-way ANOVA was employed to compare the mean differences on the ability and preference of English CDM use among three groups which were classified based on English proficiency. The results of this study showed that there was a difference in the ability to use English CDMs between Korean English learners and native English speakers (F=18.231, p=.000), and that Korean English learners and native English speakers shared similar tendencies in preference of CDM use in given contexts. Pedagogical implications, limitations of the study, and directions of further studies will be discussed. (154 words

Abstract

This study aimed to explore Korean English learners’ use of English contrastive discourse markers (CDMs) through the comparison with use of native English speakers under the frame of Fraser’s CDM model. Sixty-five undergraduate students (48 Korean English learners and 17 native English speakers) participated in the study and completed two tasks (i.e. test for ability to use English CDMs and English CDM preference questionnaire). One-way ANOVA was employed to compare the mean differences on the ability and preference of English CDM use among three groups which were classified based on English proficiency. The results of this study showed that there was a difference in the ability to use English CDMs between Korean English learners and native English speakers (F=18.231, p=.000), and that Korean English learners and native English speakers shared similar tendencies in preference of CDM use in given contexts. Pedagogical implications, limitations of the study, and directions of further studies will be discussed. (154 words

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Alavi-Nia, M, "Discourse particles in EFL and PFL course-books : Tracing text authenticity", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, pp.161~170 (2014)
  2. Al-Qwayid, R. H, "The use of contrastive discourse markers in academic writing by English-major Saudi female undergraduates at Qassim University", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), pp.51~64 (2018)
  3. Cho, M, "A study on Korean English learners’ acquisition on contrastive discourse markers", MA, pp.2017
  4. Fraser, B, "An approach to discourse markers", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp.383~395 (1990)
  5. Fraser, B, "Discourse markers", pp.301~326 (1998), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  6. Fraser, B, "What are discourse markers", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.931~952 (1999)
  7. Fraser, B, "Approaches to discourse particles", pp.189~204 (2006), Elsevier
  8. Fraser, B, "Combinations of contrastive discourse markers in English", International Review of Pragmatics, 5(2), pp.318~340 (2013)
  9. Halliday, M, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  10. Jucker, A, "The discourse marker well : A relevance-theoretical account", Journal of Pragmatics, 19, pp.435~452 (1993)
  11. Kaveifard, E, "Inferential discourse markers in discussion section of psychological research articles across English and Persian", Theory and Practice Language Studies, 1(12), pp.1786~1791 (2011)
  12. Kim, H, "Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics", pp.495~516 (1994), CSLI
  13. Kim, S, "An analysis of contrastive connectors in high school English textbooks", MA, pp.2010
  14. Mohseni, A, "Analysis of contrastive discourse markers implementation in ESP books of computer science developed by non-native(Iranian)and native(British)authors", Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(6), pp.1288~1144 (2015)
  15. Povolna, R, "Causal and contrastive discourse markers in novice academic writing", Brno Studies in English, 38(2), pp.131~148 (2012)
  16. Power, D, "Academic demands related to listening skills", Language Teaching, 3, pp.1~38 (1986)
  17. Richards, J. C, "Teaching in cation: Case studies from second language classrooms" (1998), Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages
  18. Schiffrin, D, "Discourse markers" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  19. Schiffrin, D, "The handbook of discourse analysis", pp.54~75 (2001), Blackwell
  20. Schourup, L. C, "Common discourse particles in English conversation" (1982), Garland
  21. Tahaineh, Y, "A review of EFL Arab learners’ language pitfalls and pedagogical implications", International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), pp.84~102 (2014)
  22. Warsi, J, "The acquisition of English contrastive discourse markers by advanced Russian ESL students" (2001), Boston University Press
  23. Watts, R, "Taking the pitcher to the ‘well’ : Native speakers’ perception of their use of discourse markers in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 13, pp.203~237 (1989)
  24. Yang, L, "Approaches to discourse particles", pp.265~298 (2016), Elsevier

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)