통제 구문의 이동 분석에 관한 고찰과 제언
A Study and Suggestion on the Movement Theory of Control Construction
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore an alternative on the movement theory of control construction in English. First, this paper compares two different proposals of the movement theory of control: the theta role-based one and the merge-based one on the basis of c-selection. In the former proposal, movement of a DP is driven by the need to receive a theta feature of the verb it merges with, and in the latter one, merge is driven by interpretable or uninterpretable c-selection features. Both proposals are similar in that they eliminate D-structure as a grammatical level, but they are different in that only the merge-based analysis eliminates the LF level as well, arguing that it is unnecessary to make use of theta features. This paper argues against the use of theta features in syntax on the ground that they are fundamentally semantic. On close investigation, the merge-based analysis by c-selection is more valid in explaining the movement theory of control. However, It points out the merge-based analysis by c-selection has some problems. For example, it is possible that a computational system is more complicated because of c-selection. Therefore, this paper argues that the merge-based analysis by c-selection needs to revise and newly proposes merge-based analysis by phase, instead of c-selection, to account for the movement theory of control.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore an alternative on the movement theory of control construction in English. First, this paper compares two different proposals of the movement theory of control: the theta role-based one and the merge-based one on the basis of c-selection. In the former proposal, movement of a DP is driven by the need to receive a theta feature of the verb it merges with, and in the latter one, merge is driven by interpretable or uninterpretable c-selection features. Both proposals are similar in that they eliminate D-structure as a grammatical level, but they are different in that only the merge-based analysis eliminates the LF level as well, arguing that it is unnecessary to make use of theta features. This paper argues against the use of theta features in syntax on the ground that they are fundamentally semantic. On close investigation, the merge-based analysis by c-selection is more valid in explaining the movement theory of control. However, It points out the merge-based analysis by c-selection has some problems. For example, it is possible that a computational system is more complicated because of c-selection. Therefore, this paper argues that the merge-based analysis by c-selection needs to revise and newly proposes merge-based analysis by phase, instead of c-selection, to account for the movement theory of control.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김경미, "영어 역행 결속구문의 이동분석에 관한 연구", 새한영어영문학, 51(1), pp.233~253 (2009), 새한영어영문학회
- Bobaljik, J., "Icelandic Control is Not A-movement: The case from case", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.113~132 (2009)
- Boeckx, C., "Reply to Control Is Not Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.269~280 (2003)
- Boeckx, C., "Movement under Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.431~452 (2004)
- Boeckx, C., "The Virtues of Control as Movement", Syntax, 9(2), pp.118~130 (2006)
- Boeckx, C., "On (Non-) Obligatory Control, in New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising", pp.251~262 (2007), Springer
- Boeckx, C., "Copy-reflexive and Copy-control constructions: A movement analysis", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 8, pp.61~100 (2008)
- Bowers, J., "On Reducing Control to Movement", Syntax, 11(2), pp.125~143 (2008)
- Brody, M., "Relating Syntactic Elements: Remarks on Hornstein's Movement and Chains", Syntax, 2, pp.210~226 (1999)
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Beyond explanatory adequacy", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20 (2004), MITWPL
- Chomsky, N., "On Phases", 석사, pp.2005
- Chomsky, N., "Principles and Parameters, Theory", pp.506~569 (1993), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research
- Culicover, P., "Control is not Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.493~512 (2001)
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Hornstein, N., "On Control, in Minimalist Syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
- Hornstein, N., "A Theory of Syntax" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Hornstein, N., "Understanding Minimalism, in An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Huang, C., "Logical Relations in Chinese and The Theory of Grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Kiguchi, H., "Pro-gate and Sideward Movement", 석사, pp.2004
- Landau, I., "Movement out of Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.471~498 (2003)
- Landau, I., "Movement-Resistant Aspects of Control. In Stanley Dubinsky and Davies, in New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising", pp.293~325 (2007), Springer
- Lasnik, H., "Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory" (2003), Routledge
- Manzini, M, "A Minimalist Theory of A-movement and Control", Lingua, 110, pp.409~447 (2000)
- Martin, R, "A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control", 박사, pp.1996
- Nunes, J., "Sideward Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.303~344 (2001)
- Rosenbaum, P., "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Construction" (1967), MIT Press
- Takano, Y., "Scrambling and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.83~110 (2010)