A Study of University Conversation Instruction and Reconstruction Tasks
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of conversation instruction at universities. It compares four conversation classes taught in the usual way (Condition 1) with students in other classes working with the same textbook material (focused on the present continuous) under three other non-instructor conditions; Condition 2: students (3 classes) working in pairs on reconstruction tasks, Condition 3: students (2 classes) working individually on reconstruction tasks, and Condition 4: students (2 classes) simply reading the textbook (the control). Two types of evaluation were used -- for communicative effect and for verb formation. An immediate posttest and a 4-week delay test were administered. The instructors’ classes taught in the usual way (Condition 1) failed to outperform the control students. Those doing the reconstruction tasks (Conditions 2 and 3) outperformed the instructors’ classes (Condition 1) and the control on both post and delayed tests.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bourke, "The case for problem solving in second language learning Center for Language and Communication Studies Occasional Papers", pp.1~27 (1992)
- Day,E, "Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion", 41(1), pp.25~58 (1991)
- Ellis, R, "The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings", 21(2), pp.285~301 (1999)
- Ellis,R, "Bugs and birds:Children’s acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction", 25(2), pp.247~259 (1997)
- Ellis, "comprehension and the acquisition of word meanings", pp.449~491 (1994)
- Fotos,S, "Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks", 28(2), pp.323~352 (1994)
- Fotos,S, "Communicating about grammar:A task-based approach", 25(4), pp.605~628 (1991)
- Graves,K, "A framework of course development processes.Teachers as course developers", pp.12~38 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Harley,B, "Functional grammar and French immersion:A classroom experiment", 10(3), pp.331~359 (1989)
- Harley,B, "The role of focus-on-form tasks and promoting child L2 acquisition. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.156~174 (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Kang,D, "The differential effects of focus on form instructions on EFL high school learners’ grammar learning", 16(1), pp.57~82 (2004)
- Lee,H, "Communicative output as a mode of focus on form", 57(3), pp.171~192 (2002)
- Lyster,R, "The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students sociolinguistic competence", 15(3), pp.263~287 (1994)
- Mackey, "Stepping up the pace The empirical study of questions in ESL University of Sydney" (1995), Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia
- Nakatani,Y, "The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy", 89(1), pp.76~91 (2005)
- Nunan,D, "Designing tasks for the communicative classroom" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Richards, J, "New interchange, book 1(Korean Version)" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Rosenthal, "Essentials of behavioral research", & ros(w) (1991), McGraw-Hill
- Smith, B, "The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication", 39(1), pp.33~58 (2005)
- Spada,N, "Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms", 15(2), pp.205~224 (1993)
- Swain, "Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development Input in second language acquisition", pp.235~253 (1985)
- Swain, M., "Focus on form through collaborative dialogue, Researching pedagogic tasks second language learning, teaching and testing", pp.99~118 (2001)
- White,L, "Second language acquisition and universal grammar", 12(2), pp.121~33 (1990)
- Williams,J, "What kind of focus and on which forms. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.139~155 (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Yang, M., "A comparison of the efficacy between input- based instruction and output-based instruction in focus on form", 59(2), pp.145~160 (2004)
