본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학교 영어과 교사용 지도서의 교사 발문 분석: 상호 작용을 중심으로

An analysis of the types of a teacher’s interaction in the teacher’s guide for elementary English textbooks.

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate a teacher’s interaction types in the teacher’s guidebooks based on the 7th curriculum. To achieve this purpose, the types of interactions were analyzed in focus on the teacher’s role as to whether it realizes the main ideas of 7th national English curriculum by using twelve items of analysis criteria; teacher’s role should be the facilitator or scaffolder of communication between teachers and students. The study finds that several teacher’s interaction types should be more emphasized in order for elementary school students to participate in active teacher-students as well as students- students interaction, and to take the initiative by deriving their background experiences. This study also finds that teacher’s interaction types are inclined to cognitive-types comparing to affective ones such as that of encouraging practice, recruiting interest, controlling frustration, or inviting student participation, which are crucial elements for elementary students to challenge foreign language study. The study following interactionist’s and socio-constructivist’s theory in the field of language learning suggests that teacher’s guide should consider the importance of sharing students’ background experiences for more solid conceptualization and internalization of new language resources.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate a teacher’s interaction types in the teacher’s guidebooks based on the 7th curriculum. To achieve this purpose, the types of interactions were analyzed in focus on the teacher’s role as to whether it realizes the main ideas of 7th national English curriculum by using twelve items of analysis criteria; teacher’s role should be the facilitator or scaffolder of communication between teachers and students. The study finds that several teacher’s interaction types should be more emphasized in order for elementary school students to participate in active teacher-students as well as students- students interaction, and to take the initiative by deriving their background experiences. This study also finds that teacher’s interaction types are inclined to cognitive-types comparing to affective ones such as that of encouraging practice, recruiting interest, controlling frustration, or inviting student participation, which are crucial elements for elementary students to challenge foreign language study. The study following interactionist’s and socio-constructivist’s theory in the field of language learning suggests that teacher’s guide should consider the importance of sharing students’ background experiences for more solid conceptualization and internalization of new language resources.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "초등학교 교육과정해설 (Ⅴ)" (1997), 대한교과서주식회사.
  2. "초등학교 영어 6학년 교사용 지도서" (2002), 대한교과서주식회사
  3. "초등학교 영어 지도서에 제시된 교사의 scaffolding 발문 유형 분석", 16(3), pp.239~258 (2004)
  4. "구성주의(constructivism)의 교육적 함의", 3(1), pp.1~15 (2000)
  5. "Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education" (1996), National Association for the Education of Young Children
  6. "Understanding second language acquisition" (1985), Oxford University Press
  7. "Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development Input in second language acquisition", pp.69~85 (1985), Newbury House Publishers Inc
  8. "Studies in Second Language Acquisition", pp.283~302 (1994)
  9. "Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision", 84(1), pp.51~68 (2000)
  10. "Georgetown round-table on languages and linguistics", pp.168~180 (1980), Georgetown University Press
  11. "University of California" (1980), Unpublished doctoral dissertation
  12. "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences", pp.259~278 (1981)
  13. "Native speaker", nonnative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input, 1983, pp.4, 126~141
  14. "A role for instruction in second language acquisition", pp.79~99 (1985), Pienemann
  15. "What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition", pp.303~323 (1994)
  16. "The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem solving task", 8, pp.147~155 (1990)
  17. "The impact of interaction on comprehension", 21, pp.737~758 (1987)
  18. "Mother-child interaction across culture From intersubjectivity to regulation in the zone of proximal development Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting" (1991)
  19. "Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  20. "The role of tutoring in problem solving", 17, pp.89~100 (1976)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)