Notes on Subextraction and Labeling Algorithm
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to show the explanatory power of labeling algorithm in Chomsky(2013, 2014) and consider the correlation between subextraction and labeling algorithm. Especially, we will consider how the effects of Condition on Extraction Domain and Freezing effects can be made under the theory of labeling algorithm in Chomsky(2013, 2014) and Goto(2015). Especially, we will investigate the correlation between labeling and extraction phenomena in English under the theory of Goto(2015) and point out the problems of Goto’s(2015) analysis of correlation between extraction and labeling. After indicating Goto’s(2015) problems, we will propose that movement over the labeled syntactic object can be allowed, but movement over the unlabeled syntactic object can be disallowed. To prove our proposal, we will suggest the following empirical evidences as follows: (i) the grammatical contrast between PP-raising over wh-element which is the labeled syntactic object and PP-raising over topicalized element which is the unlabeled syntactic object in English (ii) the grammatical contrast between wh-subject raising over T with Agent Focus morpheme and wh-subject raising over T without Agent Focus morpheme in Kaqchikel, a Mayan language of Guatemala
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to show the explanatory power of labeling algorithm in Chomsky(2013, 2014) and consider the correlation between subextraction and labeling algorithm. Especially, we will consider how the effects of Condition on Extraction Domain and Freezing effects can be made under the theory of labeling algorithm in Chomsky(2013, 2014) and Goto(2015). Especially, we will investigate the correlation between labeling and extraction phenomena in English under the theory of Goto(2015) and point out the problems of Goto’s(2015) analysis of correlation between extraction and labeling. After indicating Goto’s(2015) problems, we will propose that movement over the labeled syntactic object can be allowed, but movement over the unlabeled syntactic object can be disallowed. To prove our proposal, we will suggest the following empirical evidences as follows: (i) the grammatical contrast between PP-raising over wh-element which is the labeled syntactic object and PP-raising over topicalized element which is the unlabeled syntactic object in English (ii) the grammatical contrast between wh-subject raising over T with Agent Focus morpheme and wh-subject raising over T without Agent Focus morpheme in Kaqchikel, a Mayan language of Guatemala
참고문헌 (30)
- Bošković, Ž., "On the Timing of Labeling: Deducing Comp-trace effects, the Subject Condition, the Adjunct Condition, and Tucking in from Labeling", ms, pp.2015
- Broekhuis, H., "Organizing the Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdjik", pp.59~68 (2005), Moutonde Gruyter
- Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lansik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection : Extensions" (2014), MIT Press
- Culicover, P., "Polarity, Inversion, and Focus in English", ESCOL, 8(1), pp.46~68 (1991)
- Delahunty, P., "But Sentential Subjects Do Exist", Linguistic Analysis, 12, pp.379~398 (1983)
- Emonds, J., "Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects", pp.75~120 (2004), Kluwer
- Epstein, S., "Labeling by Minimal Search : Implications for Successive Cyclic A-movement and the Elimination of the Postulate"Phase"", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.463~481 (2014)
- "Anti-locality and Optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus"[URL]
- Goto, N., "On the Necessity of Labeling in Narrow Syntax : Exploring a Third Approach", ms, pp.2015
- Huang, C. -T. James., "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar", Ph. D., pp.1982
- Ishii, T., "Adjunct Condition and Empty Operator Movement", Bungei Kenkyu, 91, pp.21~52 (2003)
- Koizumi, M., "Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax", Ph. D., pp.1995
- Kwon. K., "That-trace Effect and Labeling Algorithm", ms.
- Lasnik, H., "The EPP and the Subject Condition under Sluicing", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.649~660 (2003)
- Lasnik, H., "Move α" (1992), MIT Press
- On Verb Movement in the Labeling Algorithm-based Derivation, "Mayumi H.", 51~66, pp.Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 94 (2015)
- Matsubara, F., "Remarks on Chomsky’s(2008) Analysis of Extraction from subject", English Linguistics, 25(2), pp.464~474 (2008)
- Müller, G., "A Constraint on Remnant Movement", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.355~407 (1998)
- Müller, G., "Constraints on Displacement : A Phase-based Approach" (2011), John Benjamins Pubishing Compay
- Rizzi, L., "Wh-movement: Moving on", pp.97~133 (2006), MIT Press
- Ross, J., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", Ph. D., pp.1967
- Stepanov, A., "The End of the CED? Minimalism and extraction domains", Syntax, 10(1), pp.80~126 (2007)
- Sugimura, M., "How to Label {H, H}: A View from Lexical V-V Compounds in Japanese", 9th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics(TEAL-9) held at Université de Nantes (2014)
- Wexler, K., "Formal Syntax", pp.7~60 (1977), Academic Press
- Wexler, K., "Formal Principles of Language Acquisition" (1980), MIT Press