Notes on {XP, YP} Problem at a Root Clause
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we will show how {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of scrambling structures in Japanese and the sentential subject constructions in English can be explained under the theory of Labeling Algorithm in Chomsky (2013, 2015). As for {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of scrambling structures, we will assume that the scrambled phrase bears [Focus] features and is moved to [Spec, C] of the matrix clause and the {XP, YP} problem of scrambling constructions can be solved by the way of labeling through focus feature sharing between the scrambled phrases and the matrix C. As for {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of sentential subject constructions in English, we will suggest that since sentential subject constructions involve a DP-shelled structure with a φ-feature, following Dubinsky and Davies (2006), the syntactic object at a root clause of sentential subject constructions can be labeled as {φ, φ}. In addition, we will also show that our approach can be extended to PP subject constructions in English.
Abstract
In this paper, we will show how {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of scrambling structures in Japanese and the sentential subject constructions in English can be explained under the theory of Labeling Algorithm in Chomsky (2013, 2015). As for {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of scrambling structures, we will assume that the scrambled phrase bears [Focus] features and is moved to [Spec, C] of the matrix clause and the {XP, YP} problem of scrambling constructions can be solved by the way of labeling through focus feature sharing between the scrambled phrases and the matrix C. As for {XP, YP} problem at a root clause of sentential subject constructions in English, we will suggest that since sentential subject constructions involve a DP-shelled structure with a φ-feature, following Dubinsky and Davies (2006), the syntactic object at a root clause of sentential subject constructions can be labeled as {φ, φ}. In addition, we will also show that our approach can be extended to PP subject constructions in English.
참고문헌 (19)
- Abe, J, "Dynamic antisymmetry for labeling", Lingua, 174, pp.1~15 (2016)
- Abe, J., "The Nature of Scrambling and Its Interaction with Labeling", Ms. Satellite Workshop of the 24th J, 2017, ~[DOI]
- Alrenga, P., "A Sentential Subject Asymmetry in English and its Implications for Complement Selection", Syntax, 8(3), pp.175~207 (2005)
- Chomsky, N., "The View From Building 20", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.3~16 (2015), John Benjamins
- Stanely Dubinsky, "Sentential (and Other Non-nominal) Subjects in English", 현대문법연구, (45), pp.1~32 (2006), 현대문법학회
- Holmberg, A., "Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions", Lingua, 113, pp.997~1019 (2003)
- Emonds, J., "Goals of Linguistic Theory", pp.21~62 (1972), Prentice-Hall
- Koster, J., "Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages", pp.53~64 (1978), MIT Press
- 권기양, "Sentential Subjects Revisited", 새한영어영문학, 57(1), pp.221~238 (2015), 새한영어영문학회
- McCloskey, J, "There, It, and Agreement", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.563~567 (1991)
- Moulton, K, "Not Moving Clauses : Connectivity in Clausal Arguments", Syntax, 16, pp.250~291 (2013)
- Narita, H., "Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics", 286~295 (2015)
- Saito, M., "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications", Ph.D., pp.1985
- Saito, M, "Long distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Saito, M, "(A) Case for labeling: Labeling in languages without φ-feature agreement", The Linguistic Review, 33, pp.129~175 (2016)
- Takita, K., "Labeling through Spell-Out", The Linguistic Review, pp.177~198 (2016)
- Takahashi, D, "Movement of wh-phrases in Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, pp.655~678 (1993)