Subject Extraction and Labeling Algorithm
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper demonstrates that subject extraction in Korean, which apparently violates the Subject Criterion (SC), actually fits with the labeling theory (Chomsky 2013) and Criterial Freezing (CF) (Rizzi 1997, 2006, 2015, 2016, 2017). It is shown that subjects are legitimately extracted in Korean by the labeling algorithm, without violating CF. It is suggested that the head of Finiteness Phrase (FinP) satisfying SC makes subject extraction possible through Spec-FinP. The extracted subject NP is properly labeled in the left periphery of CP by sharing features such as a focus feature or a topic feature. Various constructions such as Korean seem-clauses, ECM-clauses, regular complex clauses, and wh-clauses are analyzed with respect to subject extraction. This analysis is based on Rizzi and Shlonsky (2007) and Citko, Germain, and Witkos (2018), in which the notion of criterial satisfaction is extended from Spec-head configurations to head-head configurations.
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that subject extraction in Korean, which apparently violates the Subject Criterion (SC), actually fits with the labeling theory (Chomsky 2013) and Criterial Freezing (CF) (Rizzi 1997, 2006, 2015, 2016, 2017). It is shown that subjects are legitimately extracted in Korean by the labeling algorithm, without violating CF. It is suggested that the head of Finiteness Phrase (FinP) satisfying SC makes subject extraction possible through Spec-FinP. The extracted subject NP is properly labeled in the left periphery of CP by sharing features such as a focus feature or a topic feature. Various constructions such as Korean seem-clauses, ECM-clauses, regular complex clauses, and wh-clauses are analyzed with respect to subject extraction. This analysis is based on Rizzi and Shlonsky (2007) and Citko, Germain, and Witkos (2018), in which the notion of criterial satisfaction is extended from Spec-head configurations to head-head configurations.
참고문헌 (18)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Choi, Young Sik, "A study of ascension constructions in Korea", Doctor, pp.1988
- Citko, Barbara, "If you cannot agree, move on! On labels and non-nominative subjects", Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), pp.1~46 (2018)[DOI]
- Kim, Young-Joo, "The syntax and semantics of Korean Case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation", Doctor, pp.1990
- Kim, Young-Joo, "Nominative Case-marking in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 1, pp.113~148 (1991)
- Ko, Heejeong, "Subject scrambling", Japanese, 2008, pp.13, 193~206[DOI]
- 이혜란, "A Study on Scrambling in Korean: The Minimalist Approach", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.425~460 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Lee, Hyeran, "Subject extraction and labeling algorithm", Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the Korean Generative Grammar and Korean Society for Language and Information, pp.23~32 (2021)
- 박명관, "Labeling, Cartography, and the Left-periphery of Korean Clauses", 언어학, 26(4), pp.151~176 (2018), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Elements of Grammar:A Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Wh-movement:Moving on", pp.97~134 (2006), MIT Press
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.17~46 (2015), John Benjamins
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Labeling, maximality, and the head-phrase distinction", The Linguistic Review, 33, pp.103~127 (2016)
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Types of criterial freezing" (2017), Lingbuzz.com
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Interfaces + Recursion= Language?", pp.115~160 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Taraldsen, Knut T, "Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar 6", pp.163~182 (2001), Oxford University Press
- 엄홍준, "한국어에서의 논항 이동과 pro", 현대문법연구, (59), pp.67~88 (2010), 현대문법학회
- Yoon, Jeong-Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~381 (1989)