본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

僧家文學에 있어 自我表出과 그 문학사적 의의

Self-expression and its Literature-history Significance in Buddhist Priesthood(僧家) Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류불교학

초록

The purpose of this study is to illuminate a point in the aspect of literature history that Buddhist monks had been positive in revealing ‘me’ from the early times compared to the literature in Confucian scholars. What reveals self as the narrative entity and hero is said to be Oriental tradition. However, Buddhist monks didn’t hesitate comparatively to clarify own past, inner world, and journey through travel sketches, letters and others. The works belonging to it are typical in the travel sketches by the monk Hyecho, letter by the monk Uicheondaesa, Yusangi(遊山記) and letter by the monk Cheonchaek, and the letter by the monk Seosan. Among those things, the travel sketches by the monk Hyecho and the monk Cheonchaek allow the hero to be in the position of well reporting directly the strange world as the narrator and simultaneously as the entity of travel. Also, the letters by the Daegakguksa(national preceptor with great enlightenment) and the monk Cheonchaek are clarifying to other person based on self-experience about how the person of first entering the Buddhist priesthood reached the deep world of Buddhism and about what the characteristics in Buddhism are. Finally, the monk Seosan saw the world as a dream, and enjoyed expressing by comparing to the existence of walking aimlessly in it. Given arranging this, heros are shown to be entity in report, transcendental, and sleep-walking. Through this, the Buddhist literature is revealed to mobilize diverse sights even in expressing ‘me’. Writing in this method of seeking for self seems to be one of important characteristics in Buddhist literature, which is distinguished from Confucian literature, as well as being conformed to autobiography in a modern sense.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to illuminate a point in the aspect of literature history that Buddhist monks had been positive in revealing ‘me’ from the early times compared to the literature in Confucian scholars. What reveals self as the narrative entity and hero is said to be Oriental tradition. However, Buddhist monks didn’t hesitate comparatively to clarify own past, inner world, and journey through travel sketches, letters and others. The works belonging to it are typical in the travel sketches by the monk Hyecho, letter by the monk Uicheondaesa, Yusangi(遊山記) and letter by the monk Cheonchaek, and the letter by the monk Seosan. Among those things, the travel sketches by the monk Hyecho and the monk Cheonchaek allow the hero to be in the position of well reporting directly the strange world as the narrator and simultaneously as the entity of travel. Also, the letters by the Daegakguksa(national preceptor with great enlightenment) and the monk Cheonchaek are clarifying to other person based on self-experience about how the person of first entering the Buddhist priesthood reached the deep world of Buddhism and about what the characteristics in Buddhism are. Finally, the monk Seosan saw the world as a dream, and enjoyed expressing by comparing to the existence of walking aimlessly in it. Given arranging this, heros are shown to be entity in report, transcendental, and sleep-walking. Through this, the Buddhist literature is revealed to mobilize diverse sights even in expressing ‘me’. Writing in this method of seeking for self seems to be one of important characteristics in Buddhist literature, which is distinguished from Confucian literature, as well as being conformed to autobiography in a modern sense.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 제럴드 프린스, "서사론사전", pp.116~ (1992), 민지사
  2. 曺壽鶴, "한국의 托傳과假傳연구", pp.65~ (1987), 영남대출판부
  3. 우에다 요시부미, "대승불교의 사상", pp.174~ (1989), 민족사
  4. 마스타니 후미오, "불교개론", pp.103~104 (1991), 현암사
  5. 장덕순, "최초의 異域紀行文", 수필문학, 38 (1975)
  6. 박기석, "往五天竺國傳의 몇 가지 문제", 선청어문, ~ (1979)
  7. 김일열, "往五天竺國傳에 관한 문학적 연구", 어문논총, 15 (1981), 경북대
  8. 김석회, "往五天竺國傳 어떻게 가르칠 것인가, 고전문학 어떻게 가르칠 것인가"
  9. 이상익, "집문당" (1994), 집문당
  10. 이석호, "왕오천축국전", pp.15~ (1970), 을유문화사
  11. 高柄翊, "慧超往五天竺國傳硏究史略, 백성욱박사송수기념불교학논문집", 백성욱박사송수기념불교학논문집, 308~ (1958)
  12. 이재선, "한국단편소설연구", pp.175~ (1975), 일조각
  13. 天?, "『호산록』 권4. “幸今師寓迹維桑 爲東白蓮之鼻祖 恒峙法華道場 焉知大乘蓮舌之餘香 ?釀千古 今始發揚 盖記斯迹以貽後觀耶 ”", ~
  14. 김승호, "고려 佛家의 自傳的 글쓰기와 그 양상-書信 및 碑銘을 중심으로-", 고전문학연구, 23, pp.5~146 (2003), 한국고전문학회
  15. 義天, "大覺國師文集"
  16. 르죈, "자서전의 규약", pp.17~ (1998), 문학과 지성사
  17. 조동일, "한국문학통사 2", pp.177~ (1984), 지식산업사
  18. 박희병, "고려후기 선초인물의정신사적 검토", 한국고전인물연구, pp.17~ (1992)
  19. 休靜, "淸虛集 권 7,〈 上完山盧府尹書〉", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)