현대시에 나타난 폭력 연구
A study on the violence in modern Korean poetry
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study managed to examine violence in modern Korean poetry. Human history is troubled with concrete and intangible violence. From Plato and Aristotle of ancient Greek to Eric Hobsbawm who called 20th century as era of violence are proved. Violence definitely an act of barbarism but spread it widely in a civilized society. If so, Korean literature has logical conclusion that detect and reflect an indiscreet violence in our life. Various literary works that arouse violence are prove it. Nevertheless, previous studies have some limitation. Especially that doesn’t approach to social level and understand accidental phenomena. So previous studies can’t examine in-depth violence that includes origin and category. Besides that understands dichotomous way of right and wrong thus doesn’t understand until in-depth violence and complex contradiction. It is the purpose of this study examine violence in modern Korean poetry. This study examine origin and in-depth of violence through various violence aspect as literary imagination. For this study managed to work of central poet in Korean literature. That will be a preliminary study about structure of violence in Korean literature. At first, this study examine Park Bong-U’s poetry. He faces up to the violence of war and humbug in the anticommunism ideology era. And he has made an effort to overcome anticommunism ideology during his all life. Usually violence is power can be destroy and it’s divided into personal violence and mass violence. Among them, war has double meaning that conflict between personal violence and copower. War is the most violence by ‘zoon politikon’and the most contradictory politics. Because war exert legitimate violence for peace and stability of humankind. The antinomy of war has limitation clearly. Thus war, at the risk of human lives, failed politics regardless of outcome. The Korean war is good example that is intensive violent,deception and the impoverished conditions of the sprit of the times. Park Bong-U’s poetry is configurated that for sharp. In addition, Kim Myeong-In’s poetry suggest phases and results of violence in various. So this remind readers to tragic meaning of violence than anger about violence itself. It’s the keynote of Kim Myeong-In’s poetry that is discriminated from other Korean poetry about violence of war. Hwang Ji-U’s poetry suggest distorted form of the state power. His poetry called spearhead of deconstructing poetry in 1980’s. Nevertheless his poetry have a definite message that raised the suspicions to violence of nation. State and social institutions are macroscopic and structural systems can decide freedom and life of individual according to the principles of public peace and common good. In addition, an educational system teach patriotism to body and mind by collective and systematic diccipline. But the meaning of patriotism to Tolstoy, it is understood in a totally different dimension. Tolstoy recognize nation to evil push the world to destroy and incite desire of people. And he said to infringe upon human rights, not only for beautify and suppression in the name of public authority. Blind force of patriotism and humbug of the nation he mentioned, discovered in Hwang Ji-U’s poetry easily in 1980’s.
Abstract
This study managed to examine violence in modern Korean poetry. Human history is troubled with concrete and intangible violence. From Plato and Aristotle of ancient Greek to Eric Hobsbawm who called 20th century as era of violence are proved. Violence definitely an act of barbarism but spread it widely in a civilized society. If so, Korean literature has logical conclusion that detect and reflect an indiscreet violence in our life. Various literary works that arouse violence are prove it. Nevertheless, previous studies have some limitation. Especially that doesn’t approach to social level and understand accidental phenomena. So previous studies can’t examine in-depth violence that includes origin and category. Besides that understands dichotomous way of right and wrong thus doesn’t understand until in-depth violence and complex contradiction. It is the purpose of this study examine violence in modern Korean poetry. This study examine origin and in-depth of violence through various violence aspect as literary imagination. For this study managed to work of central poet in Korean literature. That will be a preliminary study about structure of violence in Korean literature. At first, this study examine Park Bong-U’s poetry. He faces up to the violence of war and humbug in the anticommunism ideology era. And he has made an effort to overcome anticommunism ideology during his all life. Usually violence is power can be destroy and it’s divided into personal violence and mass violence. Among them, war has double meaning that conflict between personal violence and copower. War is the most violence by ‘zoon politikon’and the most contradictory politics. Because war exert legitimate violence for peace and stability of humankind. The antinomy of war has limitation clearly. Thus war, at the risk of human lives, failed politics regardless of outcome. The Korean war is good example that is intensive violent,deception and the impoverished conditions of the sprit of the times. Park Bong-U’s poetry is configurated that for sharp. In addition, Kim Myeong-In’s poetry suggest phases and results of violence in various. So this remind readers to tragic meaning of violence than anger about violence itself. It’s the keynote of Kim Myeong-In’s poetry that is discriminated from other Korean poetry about violence of war. Hwang Ji-U’s poetry suggest distorted form of the state power. His poetry called spearhead of deconstructing poetry in 1980’s. Nevertheless his poetry have a definite message that raised the suspicions to violence of nation. State and social institutions are macroscopic and structural systems can decide freedom and life of individual according to the principles of public peace and common good. In addition, an educational system teach patriotism to body and mind by collective and systematic diccipline. But the meaning of patriotism to Tolstoy, it is understood in a totally different dimension. Tolstoy recognize nation to evil push the world to destroy and incite desire of people. And he said to infringe upon human rights, not only for beautify and suppression in the name of public authority. Blind force of patriotism and humbug of the nation he mentioned, discovered in Hwang Ji-U’s poetry easily in 1980’s.
참고문헌 (16)
- 고은, "1950년대" (1976), 청하
- 공진성, "폭력" (2009), 책세상
- 김윤식, "한국현대문학사론" (1988), 한샘
- 김윤식, "한국근대문학사상사연구 2" (1994), 아세아문화사
- 레프 톨스토이, "국가는 폭력이다" (2008), 달팽이
- 로젠 다둔, "폭력-폭력적 인간에 대하여" (1993), 동문선
- 마이클 네이글러, "폭력없는 미래" (2008), 두레
- 볼프강 조프스키, "폭력사회" (2010), 푸른숲
- 사카이다카시, "폭력의 철학" (2007), 산눈
- 심선옥, "1950년대분단의시학. in: 한국전후문학연구" (1993), 성대출판부
- 아마르티아 센, "정체성과 폭력" (2009), 바이북스
- 에릭 홉스봄, "폭력의 시대" (2008), 민음사
- 오생근, "문학의 숲에서 느리게 걷기" (2003), 문학과지성사
- 조르주 소렐, "폭력에 대한 성찰" (2007), 나남
- 토마스 홉스, "리바이어던" (2008), 나남
- 한나 아렌트, "폭력의 세기" (1994), 이후
