민주화의 역설과 한국소설의 종말론적 상상력 재고
The Paradox of Democratization and Rethinking the Apocalyptic Imagination of Korean Novel
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, it has been debated about the issues on the relationships between the ‘literature and society’, ‘literature and politics’, ‘literature and community’ which has been ignored in the 1990’s Korea. It showed that the issues on the relationships between the literature and the reality needs to be reformed and reconstructed according to the change of the political conditions. Even though the world after the human(/the end of the world) was represented as ruins or a paradise by the apocalyptic imagination in Korean novel, apocalyptic imagination means actively intervene in the reality and literary practice in these days Korean reality. This research focused on the tendency that Korean novel contained the imagination of destruction, the image of degeneration, and the despair and emptiness. Based on this research, I reviewed that space for the possibility of political subject and restore/salvation of a new legislative principals/subjects (demos) through the apocalyptic imagination in novels. Specifically, I argued that requests for critically reviewing the boundaries of the community itself through the characteristics of the apocalyptic imagination in the novel of Park Min-gyu(박민규), Kim Sung-jung(김성중), Bae Ji-young(배지영) that is the end of consciousness without anger or despair, helplessness and passivity of the 'survivors'. Apocalyptic imagination in the novel of Pyun Hye-young(편혜영) was illuminated the complete fragmentation of the community due to the isolation and separation of an individual and then it showed paradoxically request for a new community caused by the absence of the political. Finally, I confirmed that necessity for decoding the message of 'strange world' which was a imagination of the end of the world through their novels.
Abstract
Recently, it has been debated about the issues on the relationships between the ‘literature and society’, ‘literature and politics’, ‘literature and community’ which has been ignored in the 1990’s Korea. It showed that the issues on the relationships between the literature and the reality needs to be reformed and reconstructed according to the change of the political conditions. Even though the world after the human(/the end of the world) was represented as ruins or a paradise by the apocalyptic imagination in Korean novel, apocalyptic imagination means actively intervene in the reality and literary practice in these days Korean reality. This research focused on the tendency that Korean novel contained the imagination of destruction, the image of degeneration, and the despair and emptiness. Based on this research, I reviewed that space for the possibility of political subject and restore/salvation of a new legislative principals/subjects (demos) through the apocalyptic imagination in novels. Specifically, I argued that requests for critically reviewing the boundaries of the community itself through the characteristics of the apocalyptic imagination in the novel of Park Min-gyu(박민규), Kim Sung-jung(김성중), Bae Ji-young(배지영) that is the end of consciousness without anger or despair, helplessness and passivity of the 'survivors'. Apocalyptic imagination in the novel of Pyun Hye-young(편혜영) was illuminated the complete fragmentation of the community due to the isolation and separation of an individual and then it showed paradoxically request for a new community caused by the absence of the political. Finally, I confirmed that necessity for decoding the message of 'strange world' which was a imagination of the end of the world through their novels.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김성중, "허공의 아이들, In 개그맨" (2011), 문학과지성사
- 박민규, "핑퐁" (2006), 창비
- 박민규, "끝까지 이럴래?, In 더블 side A" (2010), 창비
- 배지영, "그들과 함께 걷다", 창작과비평, 155(봄) (2012)
- 윤고은, "무중력 증후군" (2008), 한겨레출판
- 윤고은, "로드킬, In 1인용 식탁" (2010), 문학과지성사
- 유현상, "1994년 어느 늦은 밤" (2012), 네오픽션
- 편혜영, "재와 빨강" (2010), 창비
- 편혜영, "블랙아웃", 자음과모음, (여름) (2012)
- 강원택, "통일 이후의 한국 민주주의" (2011), 나남
- 권지희, "촛불이 민주주의다" (2008), 해피스토리
- 김대호, "2013체제는 새로운 코리아 만들기", 창작과비평, 153(가을) (2011)
- 김동춘, "1997년 이후 한국사회의 성찰" (2006), 길
- 당대비평 기획위원회, "그대는 왜 촛불을 끄셨나요" (2009), 산책자
- 이광호, "이토록 사소한 정치성" (2006), 문학과지성사
- 임혁백, "신유목적 민주주의" (2009), 나남
- 정여울, "구원 없는 세계에서 살아남기-2000년대 한국문학에 나타난 ‘재난’과 ‘파국’의 상상력", 문학과사회, 92(겨울) (2010)
- 주일우, "재난의 실재와 파국적 상상력", 문학과사회, 92(겨울) (2010)
- 최장집, "민주화 이후의 민주주의" (2010), 후마니타스
- 최장집, "민주주의의 민주화" (2006), 후마니타스
- 최장집, "우리는 무엇을 할 것인가" (2008), 프레시안북
- 최장집, "민중에서 시민으로" (2009), 돌베개
- 황정아, "재앙의 서사, 종말의 상상-근래 한국소설의 한 계열에 관한 검토", 창작과비평, 155(봄) (2012)
- 황종연, "탕아를 위한 비평 : 황종연 평론집" (2012), 문학동네
- 酒井隆史, "통치성과 ‘자유’" (2011), 그린비
- Arendt, Hannah, "전체주의의 기원", 한길사 (2006)
- Badiou, Alain, "사도 바울" (2008), 새물결
- Bauman, Zygmunt., "지구화, 야누스의 두 얼굴" (2003), 한길사
- Beck, Ulrich., "위험사회" (1997), 새물결
- 김순영, "정치적 평등에 관하여" (2010), 후마니타스
- Foucault, Michel., "안전, 영토, 인구" (2011), 난장
- Fraser, Nancy., "뉴레프트리뷰." (2009), 길
- Polanyi, Karl., "거대한 전환" (2009), 길
- Rancière, Jacques., "정치적인 것의 가장자리에서" (2008), 길
- Rancière, Jacques., "민주주의는 왜 증오의 대상인가" (2011), 인간사랑
