A Study on the Effects of Architectural Education Using Geometric Shapes on Aesthetic awareness - Focused on Neuroscience -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background Several studies have shown that architects and consumers have different preferences in appreciating the same architectural forms. Such differences in aesthetic awareness exist in other works of art but appear to be more pronounced in architectural forms because, unlike art forms with relatively small audiences, architecture is a product of mass aesthetic awareness consumption. These differences can have a more serious impact on the appreciators of architectural forms. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the reasons for such differences. Methods This study first reanalyzes data from a survey of architects and consumers on architectural aesthetic preferences and identifies aesthetic differences between these two groups, primarily in the functionalist style of architecture. Second, the analysis of the educational system revealed that the geometric language of form, which has had a continuous influence on functionalism, may be one of the reasons for the differences in aesthetic awareness. Third, the ventral visual (HSF) pathway of the brain for stylistic processing was analyzed, and it was found that both the neostriatum associated with visual habits and the ventral striatum associated with reward mechanisms play a role in the stylistic process. Therefore, this study argues that the familiarity with the language of geometric shapes developed in the education of architects is one of the reasons for the differences in architectural aesthetics. Fourth, to establish this claim, a questionnaire experiment was conducted, and a correlation analysis of the results proved a significant correlation between familiarity with the language of geometric shapes and architectural aesthetic outcomes. Result Based on the above analysis, one of the reasons for the difference between architects' and consumers' aesthetic awareness of functionalist architectural forms is the variability in familiarity with the language of geometric shape design in the educational process. Conclusion This study argues that the geometric familiarity brought about through stylistic education affects the visual aesthetic awareness of architects. This geometry-based design education is not through recognition of the beautiful structures found but rather develops into a style that can be perceived as beautiful in its stylistic value. But this sense of beauty is perceptually differentiated by differences in people's experiences. Consumers form visual memories from everyday visual experiences and architects' visual memories from geometric modeling education. As a result of this learning, the architect's sense of beauty has a tendency to fail to meet the consumer's general sense of beauty.
Abstract
Background Several studies have shown that architects and consumers have different preferences in appreciating the same architectural forms. Such differences in aesthetic awareness exist in other works of art but appear to be more pronounced in architectural forms because, unlike art forms with relatively small audiences, architecture is a product of mass aesthetic awareness consumption. These differences can have a more serious impact on the appreciators of architectural forms. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the reasons for such differences. Methods This study first reanalyzes data from a survey of architects and consumers on architectural aesthetic preferences and identifies aesthetic differences between these two groups, primarily in the functionalist style of architecture. Second, the analysis of the educational system revealed that the geometric language of form, which has had a continuous influence on functionalism, may be one of the reasons for the differences in aesthetic awareness. Third, the ventral visual (HSF) pathway of the brain for stylistic processing was analyzed, and it was found that both the neostriatum associated with visual habits and the ventral striatum associated with reward mechanisms play a role in the stylistic process. Therefore, this study argues that the familiarity with the language of geometric shapes developed in the education of architects is one of the reasons for the differences in architectural aesthetics. Fourth, to establish this claim, a questionnaire experiment was conducted, and a correlation analysis of the results proved a significant correlation between familiarity with the language of geometric shapes and architectural aesthetic outcomes. Result Based on the above analysis, one of the reasons for the difference between architects' and consumers' aesthetic awareness of functionalist architectural forms is the variability in familiarity with the language of geometric shape design in the educational process. Conclusion This study argues that the geometric familiarity brought about through stylistic education affects the visual aesthetic awareness of architects. This geometry-based design education is not through recognition of the beautiful structures found but rather develops into a style that can be perceived as beautiful in its stylistic value. But this sense of beauty is perceptually differentiated by differences in people's experiences. Consumers form visual memories from everyday visual experiences and architects' visual memories from geometric modeling education. As a result of this learning, the architect's sense of beauty has a tendency to fail to meet the consumer's general sense of beauty.
참고문헌 (23)
- Brown, G., "Architects predict lay evaluations of large contemporary buildings : whose conceptual properties?", Journal of environmental psychology, 21(1), pp.93~99 (2001)
- Cross, A., "The educational background to the Bauhaus", Design studies, 4(1), pp.43~52 (1983)
- Fernandez-Ruiz, J., "Visual habit formation in monkeys with neurotoxic lesions of the ventrocaudal neostriatum", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(7), pp.4196~4201 (2001)
- Ghomeshi, M., "Investigating different aesthetic preferences between architects and non-architects in residential façade designs", Indoor and built environment, 22(6), pp.952~964 (2013)
- Jeffrey, D., "Planners, architects, the public, and aesthetics factor analysis of preferences for infill developments", Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, pp.271~288 (1999)
- Kim, H., "Neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory at encoding and retrieval : A unified framework and meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies", Biological Psychology, 145, pp.96~111 (2019)
- Kirk, U., "Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise : a parametric fMRI study", Brain and cognition, 69(2), pp.306~315 (2009)
- Knowlton, B. J., "A neostriatal habit learning system in humans", Science, 273(5280), pp.1399~1402 (1996)
- Kravitz, D. J., "The ventral visual pathway : an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality", Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(1), pp.26~49 (2013)
- Lambon Ralph, M. A., "Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), pp.2717~2722 (2010)
- Liu, X., "Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages : a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies", Neuroscience &Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(5), pp.1219~1236 (2011)
- deoxyglucose, "Science", 1982, 394~397
- Mahon, B. Z., "Spatial frequency tuning reveals interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems", Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 25(6), pp.862~871 (2013)
- Montañana, A., "Architects and non-architects : differences in perception of property design", Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28, pp.273~291 (2013)
- Nasar, J. L., "Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and application" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Paton, J. J., "The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning", Nature, 439(7078), pp.865~870 (2006)
- Patterson, K., "Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain", Nature reviews neuroscience, 8(12), pp.976~987 (2007)
- Pelowski, M., "Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain : The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception(VIMAP)and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates", Physics of Life Reviews, 21, pp.80~125 (2017)
- Rohrer, J. D., "Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration", Neurology, 72(18), pp.1562~1569 (2009)
- Šafárová, K., "Differences between young architects' and non-architects' aesthetic evaluation of buildings", Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(2), pp.229~237 (2019)
- Vannuscorps, G., "Shape-centered representations of bounded regions of space mediate the perception of objects", Cognitive Neuropsychology, 39(1-2), pp.1~50 (2022)
- Voytek, B., "Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia contributions to visual working memory", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(42), pp.18167~18172 (2010)
- Warrington, E. K., "The selective impairment of semantic memory", The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 27(4), pp.635~657 (1975)