셰이머스 히니와 신경림 시에 나타난 사실주의적 서정성
Realistic Lyricism in Poetry of Seamus Heaney and Shin, Kyung-rim
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Motivated with Spivak’s term “subaltern” and “parochialism”, the purpose of this paper is to present a realistic lyricism and to demonstrate the poetic voices of modern contemporary poets, Seamus Heaney and Shin Kyung-rim, who have been approved by critics as the mainstream poets in 20th-century Irish poetry and Korean one. The common ground of realistic lyricism is based on Kavanagh’s argument that “parochialism in literature has the universal meaning against the Western literary centrism.” That is to say, the modern literary society tends to regard the marginal literature as the inferior one. But the parochial writing is to overcome the established attitude in Western literature. At this juncture, Shin and Heaney, rather than focusing on particular events from the present to future, concentrate primarily on the hinterland, remembering subaltern’s life, history, territory, and tongue of native grassroots. Their writings are not from the Western literary tradition but from the native receptivity toward the rural life and its reality. Finally this poetic reception of the real experience is deeply rooted in their realistic lyricism.
Abstract
Motivated with Spivak’s term “subaltern” and “parochialism”, the purpose of this paper is to present a realistic lyricism and to demonstrate the poetic voices of modern contemporary poets, Seamus Heaney and Shin Kyung-rim, who have been approved by critics as the mainstream poets in 20th-century Irish poetry and Korean one. The common ground of realistic lyricism is based on Kavanagh’s argument that “parochialism in literature has the universal meaning against the Western literary centrism.” That is to say, the modern literary society tends to regard the marginal literature as the inferior one. But the parochial writing is to overcome the established attitude in Western literature. At this juncture, Shin and Heaney, rather than focusing on particular events from the present to future, concentrate primarily on the hinterland, remembering subaltern’s life, history, territory, and tongue of native grassroots. Their writings are not from the Western literary tradition but from the native receptivity toward the rural life and its reality. Finally this poetic reception of the real experience is deeply rooted in their realistic lyricism.
참고문헌 (13)
- 강준만, "한국문학의 위선과 기만" (2001), 개마고원
- 고종석, "모국어의 속살" (2006), 마음산책
- 김성곤, "포스트모더니즘과 현대미국소설" (1990), 열음사
- 백석, "백석시전집" (2003), 창작과 비평사
- 신경림, "농무" (1975), 창작과 비평사
- Ashcroft, Bill, "The Post-Colonial Studies" (1998), Routledge
- Heaney, Seamus, "Poems 1965-1975" (1986), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Heaney, Seamus, "The Government of Tongue" (1990), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Heaney, Seamus, "Preoccupations: Selected Prose 1968-1978" (1980), Faber and Faber
- Parker, Michael, "Seamus Heaney: The Making of the Poet" (1993), Macmillan
- Said, Edward, "Orientalism" (1978), Vintage
- Spivak, Gayatri, "Can the Subaltern Speak? in: Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture" (1988), Macmillan
- Spivak, Gayatri, "A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present" (1999), Harvard UP
