평가자의 직업윤리: 주요국의 평가윤리 원칙과 평가표준 비교
Comparison of Evaluation Ethics : Ethical Principles and Evaluation Standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the movement of performance evaluation prevails in governments and public sector, the more outside evaluators such as professors, accountants and consultants have been involved in the evaluation process. In this respect, we have much doubts whether the evaluators have the evaluation ethics. With these research questions in mind, we aim to review and compare the ethical principles and evaluation standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia. This article shows that evaluation ethics have been adopted to improve the quality and the usefulness of evaluation and the establishment movement led by the evaluation communities of each countries have reflected the professionalization of evaluation. We found evaluation ethics have some limitations, of which the compliance of ethical principles and evaluation standards are most important. In this regard, we propose some recommendations such as improvement of the sensitivity of evaluation ethics, establishment and execution of ethical principle and evaluation standards, institutionalization and enforcement of the ethical program, and professionalization of evaluation. We expect this article would trigger the researches on the evaluation ethics.
Abstract
As the movement of performance evaluation prevails in governments and public sector, the more outside evaluators such as professors, accountants and consultants have been involved in the evaluation process. In this respect, we have much doubts whether the evaluators have the evaluation ethics. With these research questions in mind, we aim to review and compare the ethical principles and evaluation standards of USA, UK, France, Canada and Australia. This article shows that evaluation ethics have been adopted to improve the quality and the usefulness of evaluation and the establishment movement led by the evaluation communities of each countries have reflected the professionalization of evaluation. We found evaluation ethics have some limitations, of which the compliance of ethical principles and evaluation standards are most important. In this regard, we propose some recommendations such as improvement of the sensitivity of evaluation ethics, establishment and execution of ethical principle and evaluation standards, institutionalization and enforcement of the ethical program, and professionalization of evaluation. We expect this article would trigger the researches on the evaluation ethics.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김규일, "정책분석가의 윤리문제", 한국정책학회보, 4(2), pp.161~184 (1995)
- 한국인의 직업윤리에 관한 연구, "김기홍", 한국직업능력개발원, ~ (1999)
- 김두형, "전문자격사의 업무상 특성과 직업윤리", 계간 세무사, (겨울), pp.16~25 (2008)
- 문태현, "정책윤리의 논거, 공리주의, 의무론, 의사소통적 접근", 한국정책학회보, 4(1), pp.87~110 (1995)
- 송희준, "정책평가윤리에 대한 통합적 접근방법", 행정논총, 44(4), pp.405~427 (2006), 한국행정연구소
- 이영균, "행정윤리의 본질과 관점", 한국정책과학학회보, 6(3), pp.113~137 (2002), 한국정책과학학회
- 홍준현, "정책분석가의 윤리인식 및 실태에 관한 연구", 한국정책과학학회보, 8(3), pp.150~160 (2004), 한국정책과학학회
- Berends., L., "Ethical Decision-making in Evaluation", Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 7(2), pp.40~45 (2007)
- Cheetham, G., "Towards a holistic model of professional competence", Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(5), pp.20~30 (1996)
- Darlene Russ-Eft, "Evaluation in Organizations - A Systematic Approach to Enhancing Learning, Performance, and Change" (2009), Basic Books
- Guba, E. G., "The Politics of Program Evaluation", pp.202~234 (1987), Sage
- Gussman., T. K., "Improving the Professionalism of Evaluation", Treasury Board Secretariat's the Center of Excellence in Evaluation, ~ (2005)
- Gwen Keith., "The Canadian Evaluation Society(CES) Experience in Developing Standards for Evaluation & Ethical Issues", The 5th European Conference on the Evaluation of Structural Funds in Budapest, Hungary. Workshop 6 , Developing STANDARDS for Evaluation & Ethical Issues (2003)
- Houle, Cyril., "Continuing Learning in the Professions" (1980), Jossey-Bass
- Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, "The Program Evaluation Standards" (1994), Sage Publications
- Kitchener, K. S., "Intuition, Critical Evaluation and Ethical Principles, The Foundation for Ethical Decisions in Counselling Psychology", The Counselling Psychologist, 12(3), pp.43~55 (1984)
- MacKay, E, "What Create the Dilemma in Ethical Dilemmas?, Examples from Psychological Practice", Ethics and Behavior, 2, pp.227~244 (1992)
- Michael Morris, "Evaluation Ethics for Best Practices - Cases and Commentaries" (2008), The Guilford Press
- Morris, M, "Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges, A National Survey", Evaluation Review, 17(6), pp.621~642 (1993)
- Newman, D. L., "Applied Ethics for Program Evaluation" (1996), Sage
- Simons., Helen, "Standards & Ethics in Evaluation" (2011), University of Southampton
- Smith., N. L., "An Analysis of Ethical Challenges in Evaluation", American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), pp.199~206 (2002)
- Stiffman, A. R., "Cultural and Ethical Issues concerning Research on American Indian Youth", Ethics and Behavior, 15(1), pp.1~14 (2005)
- Stufflebeam, D. M., "International Handbook of Educational Evaluation , Part One. Perspective", pp.279~302 (2003), Kluwer Academic
- Professional Ethics and Standards for the Evaluation Community in the Government of Canada, "Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat", ~ (2006)
- Weiss, C. H., "The Politics of Program Evaluation" (1987), Sage
- Welfel, E. R., "Introduction to the Special Section, Ethics Education-an Agenda for the 90's. Professional Psychology", Research and Practice, 23(3), pp.179~181 (1992)
- Welfel, E. R., "Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy, Standards, Research, and Emerging Issues", pp.2006, Thomson Brooks