거버넌스로서 정부위원회 위원 간 네트워크 구조 및 변화에 대한 탐색적 연구: 인천시 지방정부위원회를 중심으로
An Exploratory Study on Governance Structures of Local Government Committees Networks
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study aims to explore governance structures of local government committees using the face to face communication relations among committee members. The government committee is known as a horizontal, network governance mode, which plays a complementary role to vertical or hierarchy governance. Thus, mix of the two modes of governance can be seen as a metagovernance. Based on this theoretical concept, this study collected data of Incheon Metropolitan City government committees from 2013 to 2015. Applying social network analysis, this study analyzed the inter-government committee networks by three years, which enables us to compare governance structures between conservative mayor era(2015) and progressive mayor era(2013). As expected, the inter-committees governance structure turned out to be metagovernance. Although public officers and mayors played a policy broker role in the inter-committee network, committee members from the various backgrounds such as civil society, university, and business also played a policy broker role between committees (members). However, during the progressive mayor year, the public officer was one third of all policy brokers, whereas more than half of policy brokers were the public officers under the conservative mayor era. A lesson drawn from the analysis is that establishing a metagovernance mode for iner-committee network depends on how to balance the policy broker roles between public officers and other policy stakeholders rather than simply providing a chance for stakeholders to participate in a government committee.
Abstract
The study aims to explore governance structures of local government committees using the face to face communication relations among committee members. The government committee is known as a horizontal, network governance mode, which plays a complementary role to vertical or hierarchy governance. Thus, mix of the two modes of governance can be seen as a metagovernance. Based on this theoretical concept, this study collected data of Incheon Metropolitan City government committees from 2013 to 2015. Applying social network analysis, this study analyzed the inter-government committee networks by three years, which enables us to compare governance structures between conservative mayor era(2015) and progressive mayor era(2013). As expected, the inter-committees governance structure turned out to be metagovernance. Although public officers and mayors played a policy broker role in the inter-committee network, committee members from the various backgrounds such as civil society, university, and business also played a policy broker role between committees (members). However, during the progressive mayor year, the public officer was one third of all policy brokers, whereas more than half of policy brokers were the public officers under the conservative mayor era. A lesson drawn from the analysis is that establishing a metagovernance mode for iner-committee network depends on how to balance the policy broker roles between public officers and other policy stakeholders rather than simply providing a chance for stakeholders to participate in a government committee.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강창현, "지역복지공급거버넌스연구:네트워크 접근", 한국행정학보, 36(2), pp.313~332 (2002), 한국행정학회
- 김병섭, "정부위원회 조직의 개혁: 반복되는 답과 잃어버린 질문", 2002년도 한국행정학회 추계학술대회 발표논문 (2002)
- 김인, "지방정부의 공공서비스 전달에 있어서 거버넌스 구조가 성과에 미치는 영향: 서비스 유형별 비교분석", 한국행정학보, 40(4), pp.51~75 (2006), 한국행정학회
- 김정해, "정부위원회의 운영 및 관리상의 문제점과 개선방안", 2006년도 한국조직학회 월례세미나 발표논문 (2006)
- 김철, "정부위원회 제도 정비의 정치경제학: 정부위원회 조직 개혁의 분석과 평가", 2003년 서울행정학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문 (2003)
- 박치성, "사회간접자본시설 공공갈등 유형화에 대한 탐색적 연구", 정책분석평가학회보, 25(2), pp.71~104 (2015), 한국정책분석평가학회
- 배귀희, "공공갈등과 네트워크 거버넌스 구조: 한탄강댐 사례에서의 네트워크 특성과 주요 행위자들의 변화를 중심으로", 행정논총, 48(4), pp.107~144 (2010), 한국행정연구소
- 유재원, "시민참여의 확대방안", 한국정책과학학회보, 7(2), pp.105~125 (2003), 한국정책과학학회
- 정부위원회의 효율적 운용방안, "이종수", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2003)
- 이주헌, "지역사회서비스 전달 네트워크 거버넌스 유형에 대한 탐색적 연구: 서울시 자치구를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 44(3), pp.1~35 (2010), 한국행정학회
- 정홍익, "위원회제도를 중심으로 한 시민참여의 활성화", 한국행정학보, 25(2), pp.437~464 (1991)
- 최무현, "정부위원회 인적 특성과 정책 효과성: 대표성과 전문성에 대한 공무원의 인식을 중심으로", 행정논총, 46(2), pp.25~51 (2008), 한국행정연구소
- Agranoff, R., "Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments" (2003), Georgetown University Press
- Barabasi, A., "Linked: The New Science of Networks" (2002), Perseus Publishing
- Bell, S., "The Problematic Metagovernance of Networks: Water Reform in New South Wales", Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), pp.63~83 (2006)
- Dixon, J., "Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: Responses to Societial Governance Failure", Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(1), pp.175~196 (2002)
- Fischer, F., "The Oxford handbook of governance", pp.457~471 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Gladwell, M., "Tipping Point" (2000), Little Brown and Company
- Goldsmith, S, "Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector" (2004), Brookings Institution Press
- Hill, C. J., "Is Hierarchical Governance in Decline? Evidence from Empirical Research", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), pp.173~195 (2005)
- Kjaer, A., "Governance" (2004), Polity Press
- Meuleman, L., "The Cultural Dimension of Metagovernance: Why Governance Doctrines May Fail", Public Organization Review, 10, pp.49~70 (2010)
- Mitchell, J., "Representation in Government Boards and Commissions", Public Administration Review, 57(2), pp.160~167 (1997)
- Niskanen, W., "Bureaucracy and Representative Government" (1971), Aldine
- Park, C., "Is “Legitimized” Policy Always Successful?: Policy Legitimacy and Cultural Policy in Korea", Policy Sciences, 48(3), pp.319~338 (2015)
- Provan, K.G., "Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), pp.229~252 (2008)
- Sabatier, P. A., "An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein", Policy Sciences, 21(2-3), pp.129~168 (1988)
- Shim, J., "Identifying Policy Frames through Semantic Network Analysis: An Examination of Nuclear Energy Policy across Six Countries", Policy Sciences, 48(1), pp.51~83 (2015)
- Wasserman, S., "Social Network Analysis" (1994), Cambridge University Press