미국 교육감 선출제도의 특징과 시사점
Features of the US Direct Election System of the Educational Superintendent and Its Implications for the South Korean System
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In analyzing the background and features of the US direct election system of the superintendent, this study is intended to present the implications of the US system for the Korean system. This study covers the following: firstly, the background of the US superintendent election system, the progressive era reforms from the late 19th century to the early 20th, and the characteristics of education reforms after 1980s; secondly, concrete contents and cases of the US non-partisan election, which is quite similar to the South Korean system, and the US running-mate system, which is recently considered as an alternative; thirdly, the implications of the US system for the Korean system. This study concludes with the recommendation that like the US current system that the authority of state governors has strengthened in order to enhance consistency and accountability of educational policies, the South Korean superintendent election system should be changed based on educational autonomy’s value and orientation.
Abstract
In analyzing the background and features of the US direct election system of the superintendent, this study is intended to present the implications of the US system for the Korean system. This study covers the following: firstly, the background of the US superintendent election system, the progressive era reforms from the late 19th century to the early 20th, and the characteristics of education reforms after 1980s; secondly, concrete contents and cases of the US non-partisan election, which is quite similar to the South Korean system, and the US running-mate system, which is recently considered as an alternative; thirdly, the implications of the US system for the Korean system. This study concludes with the recommendation that like the US current system that the authority of state governors has strengthened in order to enhance consistency and accountability of educational policies, the South Korean superintendent election system should be changed based on educational autonomy’s value and orientation.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강인수, "교육감 선출제도 개선방안 연구", 교육행정학연구, 23(2), pp.261~280 (2005), 한국교육행정학회
- 고전, "지방교육자치제도 개정에 관한 논의- 민주주의·지방자치·교육자주 및 제도 원리 관점 -", 지방자치법연구, 10(2), pp.65~90 (2010), 한국지방자치법학회
- 김경회, "무상급식을 둘러싼 서울특별시장과 교육감 간의 갈등 분석", 교육정치학연구, 19(1), pp.1~28 (2012), 한국교육정치학회
- 권혁운, "교육감 직선제의 쟁점과 개선방안", 교육정치학연구, 18(2), pp.33~56 (2011), 한국교육정치학회
- 나민주, "시도교육감협의회 역할 강화 방안" (2008), 한국지방교육연구센터
- 박수정, "교육감 선거 관련 신문사설에 대한 네트워크 텍스트 분석", 교육정치학연구, 18(2), pp.183~203 (2011), 한국교육정치학회
- 박진우, "교육감 직선제 도입에 따른 제 문제의 해결방안에 관한 연구", 세계헌법연구, 17(1), pp.175~197 (2011), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 안양옥, "교육감 직선제 폐지 찬성: 직선제 혁신 통해 합리적 대안 마련해야", 대한민국국회 자료, 540, pp.116~117 (2011)
- 이상철, "교육감 주민직선제 주요 쟁점과 향후 과제:2010년 전국동시 교육감 선거결과를 중심으로", 교육문제연구, (41), pp.247~274 (2011), 교육문제연구소
- 민선 교육감 시대의 지방교육자치 발전을 위한 과제, "장덕호", 한국교육개발원, ~ (2010)
- 송기창, "교육관계자 직선에 의한 교육감 및 교육위원 선출과 교육위원회의 독립형 의결기구화를 제안한다. 투표율 10%대, 교육감·교육위원 선출방식, 이대로 둘 것인가", 국회세미나 자료 (2009)
- 송기창, "지방교육행정체제 개편의 쟁점과 과제", 교육행정학연구, 28(4), pp.405~429 (2010), 한국교육행정학회
- 해외 지방교육행정체제에 관한 연구, "최영출", 한국지방교육연구센터, ~ (2009)
- 세종특별자치시 교육청 조직 및 교육감 선출방안 연구, "최영출", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2011)
- 최홍이, "교육감 직선제 폐지 반대: 교육자치에 역행하는 행위", 대한민국국회 자료, 540, pp.118~119 (2011)
- 하봉운, "교육감·교육의원 선거평가와 지방교육자치의 발전 방향", 사회통합위원회 주최 지방선거제도개선 제2차 토론회 발표논문 (2010)
- Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, "A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century" (1986), Carnegie Corporation
- Reform of K-12 School District Governance and Management in Michigan, "Citizens Research Council of Michigan", ~, pp.CRC Report 369 (2011)
- Cohen, D., "The Classroom Impact of State and Federal Education Policy", pp.1990
- Danzberger, J., "Governing Public Schools: New Times New Requirements" (1992), Institute for Educational Leadership
- Doyle,D.,B.Cooper,and R.Trachtman, "Taking Charge: State Action on School Reform in 1980s" (1991), Hudson Institute
- Hawley, W., "Nonpartisan Election and the Case for Party Politics" (1973), John Wiley
- Hershey, M., "Party Politics in America" (2007), Longman
- Hess, F., "Assessing the Case for Mayoral Control of Urban Schools", American Enterprise Institute(AEI) for Public Policy Research, (4) (2008)
- Mayoral Influence, New Regimes, and Public School Governance, "Kirst, M.", ~, pp.Report Series, RR 049 (2002)
- Kirst, M., "Turning Points: A History of American School Governance, In Who's In Charge Here? The Tangled Web of School Governance and Policy" (2004), Brookings Institution Press
- Lee, E., "The Politics of Nonpartisanship" (1960), Univ. of California Press
- McCarthy, M., "State Education Governance Structures" (1993), Education Commission of the States
- Fulton, M., "State Notes:State Education Governance Model" (2011), Education Commission of the States
- "How Gregoire Can Shake Up Education, Restore Voter Trust" (2011)[URL]
- Schaffner, B., "New Look at the Republican Advantage in Nonpartisan Election", Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), pp.240~249 (2008)
- Schaffner, B., "The Partisan Heuristic in Low-information Election", Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(4), pp.559~581 (2002)
- Stiglitz, J., "Economics of the Public Sector, 3rd ed" (2000), W.W. Norton & Company
- Consolidation Versus Specialization: Restructuring the Washington State Executive Branch, In A joint research series from the Washington roundtable and Washington Research Council, "Thrive Washington", ~ (2011)
- Weimer, D., "School Board Elections", Education Policy Center at Michigan State University, Data Brief 5: September 2001, ~ (2001)
- "The Council of Chief State School Officers"[URL]
- "The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction"[URL]