An Empirical Study on Interregional Perceptions of Regional Infrastructure in Life Satisfaction
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) Local governments are setting policy goals and making various efforts to satisfy the lives of local residents. Existing prior studies say that a multidimensional approach to life satisfaction is required, but interest in regional infrastructure factors was insufficient. There are differences between regions in terms of regional infrastructure in terms of the components of life satisfaction. This is because local governments may have differences in life satisfaction between regions due to financial conditions and socioeconomic environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze regional differences in regional infrastructure in terms of life satisfaction. (Design/methodology/approach) For the empirical analysis of this research purpose, a binomial logit model was established and empirically analyzed using the 2017 and 2019 data of the Jeollabuk-do Social Survey. (Findings) As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that there was a difference between regions in the case of regional infrastructure factors in life satisfaction. There were regional differences in medical service, leisure life, access to convenience facilities, public transportation, and green environment. As a result of analysis based on 2019, the satisfaction of medical service was high in Jinan, Muju, and Jeongeup, and the satisfaction of leisure life was high in Jinan, Gochang, and Muju. In addition, satisfaction with housing was high in Jinan, Muju, and Iksan, and satisfaction with public transportation was relatively high in Jinan, Muju, and Iksan. (Research implications or Originality) The policy implications of the research results are that local governments should at least promote infrastructure construction to increase the life satisfaction of local residents, and continuous policy investment is required to prevent disparities in satisfaction between regions. Therefore, local governments should make policy efforts to build basic infrastructure to increase life satisfaction and improve the quality of life of local residents.
Abstract
(Purpose) Local governments are setting policy goals and making various efforts to satisfy the lives of local residents. Existing prior studies say that a multidimensional approach to life satisfaction is required, but interest in regional infrastructure factors was insufficient. There are differences between regions in terms of regional infrastructure in terms of the components of life satisfaction. This is because local governments may have differences in life satisfaction between regions due to financial conditions and socioeconomic environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze regional differences in regional infrastructure in terms of life satisfaction. (Design/methodology/approach) For the empirical analysis of this research purpose, a binomial logit model was established and empirically analyzed using the 2017 and 2019 data of the Jeollabuk-do Social Survey. (Findings) As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that there was a difference between regions in the case of regional infrastructure factors in life satisfaction. There were regional differences in medical service, leisure life, access to convenience facilities, public transportation, and green environment. As a result of analysis based on 2019, the satisfaction of medical service was high in Jinan, Muju, and Jeongeup, and the satisfaction of leisure life was high in Jinan, Gochang, and Muju. In addition, satisfaction with housing was high in Jinan, Muju, and Iksan, and satisfaction with public transportation was relatively high in Jinan, Muju, and Iksan. (Research implications or Originality) The policy implications of the research results are that local governments should at least promote infrastructure construction to increase the life satisfaction of local residents, and continuous policy investment is required to prevent disparities in satisfaction between regions. Therefore, local governments should make policy efforts to build basic infrastructure to increase life satisfaction and improve the quality of life of local residents.
참고문헌 (25)
- 임안나, "삶의 만족도 영향요인에 관한 연구: 사회적 지지를 중심으로", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(3), pp.675~682 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 채종훈, "고령자 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구: 도･농간 비교 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 31(3), pp.137~158 (2019), 한국지역개발학회
- 최자은, "관광개발영향이 지역주민의 만족도와 삶에 대한 만족도에 미치는 영향- 동해안권 광역관광개발사업 대상 지역의 주민들을 중심으로 -", Tourism Research, 43(1), pp.255~273 (2018), 한국관광산업학회[DOI]
- 최선미, "국가역량이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 분석: 행정, 사법, 정치역량을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 52(3), pp.253~289 (2018), 한국행정학회[DOI]
- 최예나, "전라북도 주민들의 삶의 만족도 결정요인 분석 - 개인요인과 지역요인을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 30(3), pp.291~312 (2016), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
- Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index", American Psychologist, 55(1), pp.34~43 (2000)
- Duncan, G., "Should Happiness-Maximization Be The Goal of Government?", Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), pp.163~178 (2010)
- Gilligan, T. D., "Initial Development and Validation of The Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale-Adolescent Version", Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2(1), pp.1~16 (2007)
- 김한성, "결혼이주여성의 삶의 만족도: 지역사회 특성과 차별경험을 중심으로", 한국사회학, 47(2), pp.177~209 (2013), 한국사회학회
- Hwang Hye In, "Analysis of the effect of social exclusion on life satisfaction and the mediating effect of empowerment", Journal of Public Management in Korea, 32(2), pp.105~132 (2018)
- Hwang Seong Ho, "The effect of social capital on life satisfaction", Journal of Public Management in Korea, 33(3), pp.1~36 (2019)
- 임선미, "중장년층의 주거환경이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 사회적 자본의 조절효과를 중심으로", 벤처창업연구, 11(1), pp.49~63 (2016), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
- 장문현, "공간빅데이터 기반의 농촌지역 기초생활인프라 취약성 진단 연구", 국토지리학회지, 56(1), pp.35~50 (2022), 국토지리학회
- 문지현, "독거노인의 삶의 만족도 영향요인 탐색 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 18(1), pp.44~54 (2018), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 전명진, "노인의 삶의 만족도 결정 요인에 관한 연구: 수도권과 비수도권 거주 노인 비교 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 28(2), pp.153~172 (2016), 한국지역개발학회
- 강상경, "삶의 만족도와 관련요인의 세대 간 차이에 대한 탐색적 연구 : 한국복지패널 자료를 이용한 베이비 붐 세대와 이전 및 이후 세대 간 비교", 사회복지연구, 43(4), pp.91~119 (2012), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
- 강시온, "청년 가구주의 자산수준이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 우울감의 매개효과 검증", 사회복지연구, 49(4), pp.195~220 (2018), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
- 2020 Rural Quality of Life and Residents' Settlement Satisfaction Survey, "Korea Rural Economic Research Institute", ~ (2020)
- 이미숙, "환경적 요인이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향", 한국혁신학회지, 13(4), pp.227~251 (2018), 한국혁신학회[DOI]
- Mi Jo Kwon., "Social Integration and Life Satisfaction: Focusing on the Perceptions of Gyeonggi-do Residents", Administrative Review, 56(1), pp.339~363 (2018)
- 이옥자, "패널자료를 활용한 수도권과 비수도권 지역의 생활만족도 결정요인", 인문사회과학연구, 18(1), pp.241~266 (2017), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- Schyns, P., "Income and Satisfaction in Russia", Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, pp.173~204 (2001)
- 황성식, "노년층의 은퇴와 삶의 만족도: 복지수준과 문화적 성향에 따른 국가 간 비교", 한국인구학, 42(3), pp.27~54 (2019), 한국인구학회[DOI]
- 양승환, "기초생활인프라 최저기준에 따른 보은군의 생활인프라 시설 충족도 분석 및 유형화", 한국농공학회논문집, 62(3), pp.15~27 (2020), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- 유은영, "농촌 주민의 지역사회 만족 영향요인", 농촌지도와 개발, 25(1), pp.15~30 (2018), 한국농촌지도학회[DOI]