‘대통령실 국민제안’ 활성화 방안: 청원법 개정 및 ‘청와대 국민청원’ 분석을 중심으로
How to Revitalize ‘Office of the President National Proposal': Focusing on Revision of the Petition Act and Analysis of the ‘Blue House National Petition’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) The current government has established ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ in response to the previous Moon Jae-in government’s ‘Blue House National Petition’ and has been operating since June 23, 2022. However, since its inception, there have been criticisms that it is difficult to form social consensus and public opinion and is less topical due to the current operating method, which restricts scalability, such as the government not implementing a response procedure if more than 200,000 cases are agreed. Therefore, this study aimed to prepare a revitalization plan for this. (Design/methodology/approach) In order to find ways to revitalize ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ through literature research and case analysis, this study examined the changes in the legal environment caused by the complete revision of the Petition Act and the current status of the electronic petition system at home and abroad, and identified the relationship and position of ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ in the legal system, and analyzed the operational problems and achievements of the previous Moon Jae-in government’s ‘Blue House National Petition’, the predecessor of ‘Office of the President National Proposal.’ (Findings) As a result of the study, four activation measures were proposed: “It is necessary to oblige the government to respond if a certain number of people agree”, “It is necessary to promote the integration of the electronic petition system between the government and the National Assembly as in the case of the United Kingdom”, “It is necessary to prepare a separate legal basis for ‘Office of the President National Proposal’”, and “It is necessary to examine the feasibility of processing the Petition 24 shortcut of ‘Office of the President National Proposal’”. (Research implications or Originality) Most of the research so far has been limited to analyzing problems and suggesting ways to improve the petition system, which has been codified since the enactment of the Petition Act in 1961, and the ‘Blue House National Petition’ of the Moon Jae-in government, which has now been closed. In particular, there has been no research on the newly established ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ following the inauguration of the current government, and there have been points of operational problems in recent years. Therefore, this study will be a timely study.
Abstract
(Purpose) The current government has established ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ in response to the previous Moon Jae-in government’s ‘Blue House National Petition’ and has been operating since June 23, 2022. However, since its inception, there have been criticisms that it is difficult to form social consensus and public opinion and is less topical due to the current operating method, which restricts scalability, such as the government not implementing a response procedure if more than 200,000 cases are agreed. Therefore, this study aimed to prepare a revitalization plan for this. (Design/methodology/approach) In order to find ways to revitalize ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ through literature research and case analysis, this study examined the changes in the legal environment caused by the complete revision of the Petition Act and the current status of the electronic petition system at home and abroad, and identified the relationship and position of ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ in the legal system, and analyzed the operational problems and achievements of the previous Moon Jae-in government’s ‘Blue House National Petition’, the predecessor of ‘Office of the President National Proposal.’ (Findings) As a result of the study, four activation measures were proposed: “It is necessary to oblige the government to respond if a certain number of people agree”, “It is necessary to promote the integration of the electronic petition system between the government and the National Assembly as in the case of the United Kingdom”, “It is necessary to prepare a separate legal basis for ‘Office of the President National Proposal’”, and “It is necessary to examine the feasibility of processing the Petition 24 shortcut of ‘Office of the President National Proposal’”. (Research implications or Originality) Most of the research so far has been limited to analyzing problems and suggesting ways to improve the petition system, which has been codified since the enactment of the Petition Act in 1961, and the ‘Blue House National Petition’ of the Moon Jae-in government, which has now been closed. In particular, there has been no research on the newly established ‘Office of the President National Proposal’ following the inauguration of the current government, and there have been points of operational problems in recent years. Therefore, this study will be a timely study.
참고문헌 (32)
- Blue House Homepage, "Three Years of the People's Petition with the People", ~ (2020)
- Blue House Homepage, "Four Years of the People's Petition. We will report it", ~ (2021)
- Blue House Homepage, "Five Years of the People's Petition That Changed the World", ~ (2022)
- Campbell. A, "The Voter Decides" (1954), Row Peterson & Company
- 최장집, "다시 한국 민주주의를 생각한다 : 위기와 대안", 한국정치연구, 29(2), pp.1~26 (2020), 한국정치연구소[DOI]
- "Average Approval Rating of Pas t Presidents in 5 Years Moon Jae-in. Kim Dae Jung. Park Geun-Hye. Kim Youn g Sam" (2022)[URL]
- Ellison. N. ., "Developing political conversations? Social media and English local authorities", Information. Communication & Society, 16(6), pp.878~898 (2013)
- Gregory A. Mark, "The Vestigial Constitution: The History and Significance of the Right to Petition", Fordham Law Review, 66, pp.2153~ (1998)
- 한주희, "정치적 연대를 위한 정치 공간으로서 온라인 국민청원 연구", 대한정치학회보, 30(4), pp.95~116 (2022), 대한정치학회[DOI]
- "On the 'Yoon Suk Yeol National Petition' ... National As sembly Petition for National Consent Raised" (2023)[URL]
- 장우영, "국민청원의 쟁점과 의제설정", 국제정치연구, 24(2), pp.203~224 (2021), 동아시아국제정치학회[DOI]
- "I wanted 'cider,' but I only gave 'sweet potato.' Thr ee years of the Blue House National Petition" (2020)[URL]
- 김성배, "청원권의 기원과 청원법의 개선방향", 세계헌법연구, 23(3), pp.179~216 (2017), 세계헌법학회한국학회[DOI]
- Lee, Ji-Eun, "The Political Effects of the Blue House's National Petition –Focusing on the Expansion of the Blue House's Influence", Master, pp.2021
- 이민영, "전자청원의 제도적 현황과 규범적 현안", 홍익법학, 22(1), pp.593~622 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이승원, "청와대 국민청원 참여요인 분석: 포퓰리즘인가, 정치효능감인가?", Oughtopia (오토피아), 33(3), pp.111~141 (2018), 인류사회재건연구원[DOI]
- "Office of the President National Proposal" (2023)[URL]
- "The Blue House National Petition" (2023)[URL]
- "Response Rate 0.026% Abolition of 'Moon People's Petiti on'... Establishment of a 100% real-name system 'non-public proposal'" (2022)[URL]
- Park, Sang-Hoon, "Blue House Government Seoul", pp.144~147 (2018), Humanitas
- "Introduction to Petitions and Procedures for Handling Petitions" (2013)[URL]
- "Petition from December 23. Apply conveniently online" (2022)[URL]
- Schumann. S. ., "Substitute or stepping stone? Assessing the impact of low‐threshold online collective actions on offline participation", European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), pp.308~322 (2015)
- Shulman. S. W., "The case against mass e‐mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in US federal rulemaking", Policy & Internet, 1(1), pp.23~53 (2009)
- 서은철, "국회에서의 국민동의 전자청원제도의 도입, 기대효과 및 향후 과제", 한국IT정책경영학회 논문지, 13(3), pp.2467~2473 (2021), 한국IT정책경영학회
- 송준모, "청와대 국민청원에서는 무엇이 일어나는가? : 자연어 처리를 활용한 청와대 국민청원 분석", 한국정치학회보, 53(5), pp.53~78 (2019), 한국정치학회
- 송경재, "온라인 입법청원과 민주주의: 영국과 독일의 비교", 국제정치연구, 23(2), pp.155~178 (2020), 동아시아국제정치학회
- Public Perception and Evaluation of the Blue House National Petition and Proposal for Institutionalization Plan for Developmental Operation –Focusing on Empirical Analysis of the Use of the National Petition, "Woo, Ji-Sook.", the Presidential Policy Planning Commission, ~ (2019)
- 양지수, "디지털 시대의 민주주의 혁신 : 국민청원제도를 중심으로", 한국과 국제사회, 6(4), pp.37~66 (2022), 한국정치사회연구소[DOI]
- 유혜린, "국민청원에 나타난 유아교사의 관심사 및 요구분석 : 2017.08 ~ 2021.06 기간의 게시글을 대상으로", 유아교육학논집, 25(6), pp.169~193 (2021), 한국영유아교원교육학회[DOI]
- 윤형석, "청원권의 실효적 보장을 위한 입법적 과제 - 국회 국민동의청원제도를 중심으로 -", 입법학연구, 17(2), pp.79~103 (2020), 한국입법학회[DOI]
- Yoon, Hyung-Seok, "The Blue House National Petition as a New Platform for Public Communication: Focusing on the Current Status and Legal System Improvement Measures", Law & Policy, 27(2), pp.81~115 (2021), Jeju National University Institute of Law and Policy