부시 정부의 선택적 핵비확산 정책 연구 : 미국의 인도 핵정책 분석을 중심으로
Korea's Main Port Competitiveness to Introduce a Free Trade Zone
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
A study of the Bush administration's selective nuclear nonproliferation policy: An analysis of U.S. nuclear policy toward India Kim, Kwanok, Kim, Ok-Joon (Keimyung University)The Bush government has initiated a confrontational policy toward North Korea and Iran which have attempted to develop nuclear weapons, while it has pursued a cooperative policy toward India that already possessed nuclear weapons. Thus, this paper attempts to define the major factors that determined such discriminatory nuclear policies of the Bush government by comparing the Indian nuclear policy of the U.S. government with its nuclear policies toward the other states which have attempted to develop nuclear weapons.The results of the comparative analysis indicate that the Bush government's Indian nuclear policy was determined not only by changes of distribution of capabilities among states due to the rise of China but also by the perception and interest of the neoconservatives who eager to prevent emergence of China as a potential hegemon by containing it with making an alliance with India. Especially the discriminatory Indian nuclear policy of the Bush government was determined mainly by perception of the neoconservatives about India as the largest democracy which compatible with their moral confidence. Thus, the results of the studies support usefulness of the neoclassical realism in explaining the Indian nuclear policy which argues the important role of distribution of capabilities among states as well as perception and interest of major politicians in making foreign policy.
Abstract
A study of the Bush administration's selective nuclear nonproliferation policy: An analysis of U.S. nuclear policy toward India Kim, Kwanok, Kim, Ok-Joon (Keimyung University)The Bush government has initiated a confrontational policy toward North Korea and Iran which have attempted to develop nuclear weapons, while it has pursued a cooperative policy toward India that already possessed nuclear weapons. Thus, this paper attempts to define the major factors that determined such discriminatory nuclear policies of the Bush government by comparing the Indian nuclear policy of the U.S. government with its nuclear policies toward the other states which have attempted to develop nuclear weapons.The results of the comparative analysis indicate that the Bush government's Indian nuclear policy was determined not only by changes of distribution of capabilities among states due to the rise of China but also by the perception and interest of the neoconservatives who eager to prevent emergence of China as a potential hegemon by containing it with making an alliance with India. Especially the discriminatory Indian nuclear policy of the Bush government was determined mainly by perception of the neoconservatives about India as the largest democracy which compatible with their moral confidence. Thus, the results of the studies support usefulness of the neoclassical realism in explaining the Indian nuclear policy which argues the important role of distribution of capabilities among states as well as perception and interest of major politicians in making foreign policy.
참고문헌 (47)
- Bajoria, Jayshree, "The U.S.-India Nuclear Deal"
- [URL]
- Burns Nicholas R, "America's Strategic Opportunity With India: The New U.S.-India Partnership", Foreign Affairs, 86(6) (2007)
- Christensen, Thomas J, "Perceptions and Alliances in Europe, 1865-1940" (1996), International Organization
- Christensen, Thomas J, "Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity", International Organization, 44(3) (1990)
- Dorn, Walter A, "Securing Compliance with Disarmament Treaties: Carrots, Sticks, and the Case of North Korea", Global Governance, 3 (1997)
- Friedberg, Aron, "Asian Allies: True Strategic Partners, Present Dangers" (2000), Encounter Books
- Glaser, Charles, "National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Policy", International Security, 26(1) (2001)
- Grieco, Joseph M, "Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism", International Organization, 42 (1988)
- Haas, Mark L, "Neo-Classical Realism and the Importance of Ideological Consensus in International Relations", Presented at the APSA Annual Meeting August 31-September 3 (2006)
- Hayes, Jarrod, "Identity and Images in the Democratic Peace: The US approach towards Iran and India on the Nuclear question", Prepared for presentation at the 49th International Studies Association annual convention (2008)
- Kagan, Robert, "The Illusion of Managing China" (2005), The Washington Post
- Kapur, S. Paul, "The Transformation of U.S.-India Relations", Asian Survey, (4) (2007)
- Keohane, Robert O, "After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
- Kissinger, Henry, "Diplomacy" (1994), Simon & Schuster
- Kristol, William, "Toward a neo-Reaganite foreign policy", Foreign Affairs, 75(4) (1996)
- Martin, Lisa, "Interest, Power, and Multilateralism", International Organization, 46(4)
- Mearsheimer, John J, "The False Promise of International Institutions", International Security, 20(1) (1994)
- Mishra,Pramod, "U.S. Strategy in Asia Pacific, Axis of Democracy and China", Presented at the San Francisco Convention of International Studies Association on 26-30 (2008)
- Mistry, Dinshaw, "Diplomacy, Domestic Politics, and The U.S.-Indian Nuclear Agreement", Asian Survey, (5) (2006)
- Mohan, Raja, "India and the Balance of Power", Foreign Affairs, 85(4) (2006)
- Mohan, Raja, "Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India's New Foreign Policy" (2003), Viking
- "National Security Presidential Directive-1"[URL]
- Pan Chengxin, "Window of Opportunity? Neoconservatives' Grand Strategy and Implications for the U.S.-China Relations", Prepared for the 47th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, pp.22~25 (2006)
- Perkovich, George, "Faulty Promises: The U.S.-India Nuclear Deal" (2005), Carnegie Policy Outlook
- Perkovich, George, "The End of the Nonproliferation?" (2006), Current History
- Rennack,Dianne E, "India and Pakistan: U.S. Economic Sanctions", CRS Report for Congress (2003)
- Rice, Condoleezza, "Campaign 2000: Promoting National Interest", Foreign Affairs, 79 (2000)
- Rose, Gideon, "Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy", World Politics, 51(1) (1998)
- Spector, Leonard, "Nuclear Proliferation, Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment" (2002), Lynne Rienner Publishers
- "Statement by the Iranian Government and visiting EU Foreign Ministers"[URL]
- Talbott, Strobe, "Engaging India Diplomacy, Democracy, and the Bomb" (2004), Brookings Institution Press
- Tellis, Ashley J, "The Evolution of U.S.-Indian Ties: Missile Defense in an Emerging Strategic Relationship", International Security, 30(4) (2006)
- "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons"[URL]
- "Nuclear Posture Review (Excepts)"[URL]
- U.S.Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report" (2006)
- Waltz, Kenneth, "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley
- Waltz, Kenneth, "The Emerging Structure of International Politics", International Security, 18(2) (1993)
- "A National Security Strategy for a New Century"[URL]
- White House, "Joint Statement between President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh" (2005), Office of the Press Secretary
- [URL]
- White House, "A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement" (1995)
- "The National Security Strategy of the United States"[URL]
- Wohlforth, William C, "The Perception of Power: Russia in the Pre-1914 Balance", World Politics, 39(3) (1987)
- Wohlforth, William C, "Realism and the End of the Cold War", International Security, 19(3) (1994)
- Wolfowitz, Paul, "Bridging Centuries: Fin de Siecle All Over Again", National Interest, 47 (1997)