본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bloom의 신교육목표 분류체계에 기초한 2022 개정 교육과정에서 초등 정보교육의 성취기준 분석

Analysis of Achievement Standards for Elementary Information Education in the 2022 Revised Curriculum Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 Bloom의 신교육목표 분류체계을 활용하여 2022 개정 교육과정에서 초등 정보교육의 성취기 준을 분석하는 것이다. 정보교육에 관련된 10개의 성취기준을 선택한 후, 이를 24개 문장으로 분리하여 Bloom 분 류체계의 지식수준과 인지과정 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석결과, 모든 분석 대상에서 절차적 지식을 ‘창안하기’ 형태 로 제시한 것이 20.8%로 가장 많았다. 지식수준은 절차적 지식이 62.5%로 가장 많았다. 다음은 개념적 지식과 메타인지 지식으로 바람직한 분포이었다. 인지과정에서는 ‘이해하기’가 가장 많고, ‘창안하기’, ‘적용하기’, ‘분석하기’, ‘평가하기 ’순이었다. 학교 현장에서 교육할 때, 정보교육의 중요한 학습 목표인 창의성 및 문제해결 능력을 강화하기 위하여 ‘창안하기’ 등을 더 강화할 필요가 있다.

Abstract

This study analyzes the achievement standards of elementary information education in the 2022 revised curriculum using Bloom's revised taxonomy. After selecting 10 achievement standards related to information education, they were divided into 24 sentences and analyzed in terms of knowledge level and cognitive process of Bloom's revised taxonomy. In all analysis subjects, procedural knowledge was most often presented as 20.8% in the form of 'Creation'. As for the level of knowledge, procedural knowledge was the most common at 62.5%. Next, it was a desirable distribution of conceptual and metacognitive knowledge. The cognitive process was most often 'understanding'. Next, 'creating', 'applying', 'analysis', and 'evaluation' were in order. In order to strengthen creativity and problem-solving skills, which are important learning goals of information education, it will be necessary to further increase 'creation' in school.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Pratical art curriculum, "Information Education(# 2022-33 supplement 10)", Ministry of Education, 2022
  2. Kang, K. H., "Comparison of achievement standards in the life science of 2015 and 2022 revised curriculum based on Bloom's revised taxonomy", The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 26(3), pp.103~119 (2023)
  3. Kim, J. S., "Analysis of achievement standards in the 2022 revised practical arts curriculum based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy : Focusing on technology area", The Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(1), pp.199~216 (2024)
  4. Choi, J. I., "A comparative analysis of achievement standards of the 2007 &2009 revised elementary science curriculum with next generation science standards in US based on Bloom’s revised raxonomy", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), pp.277~288 (2015)
  5. Lee, C. H., "Strategies for organizing information domain contents and developing textbook in response to the 2022 practical arts curriculum revisions", Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 36(3), pp.1~24 (2023)
  6. Anderson, L. W., "A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives" (2001), Longman
  7. Anderson, L. W., "A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives" (2001), Longman
  8. Yun, D. J., "Analysis of changes in achievement standards for the middle school information subject in the 2022 curriculum–Using Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational objectives", The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 27(7), pp.43~50 (2024)
  9. Lim, J. Y., "An analysis of the learning problems for SW education in elementary practical arts textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum", The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(2), pp.1~14 (2021)
  10. Kim, W. J., "Analysis of the 2022 Revised Science Curriculum Grades 3-4 Achievement Standards Based on Bloom’s New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Comparison to the 2015Revised Curriculum", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 43(3), pp.353~364 (2024)
  11. Kang, S. G., "A Study on the Statements of Achievement Standards for the 2022 Revised Elementary Art Curriculum Based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy : Focusing on the comparison of the common curriculum and the basic curriculum", Art Education Review, 91, pp.1~17 (2024)
  12. Bloom, B. S., "Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain" (1956), David Mckay
  13. Baek, S. J., "An analysis on the meta cognitive characteristics during the team study of elementary gifted students", Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 28(1), pp.1~24 (2024)
  14. Kim, B. O., "A comparative study of the achievement standards of the 2015and 2022 revised national English curriculum based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 24(1), pp.775~788 (2024)
  15. Lee, M. K., "Analysis of the performance verbs in achievement standard of 2022 revised elementary mathematics curriculum based on revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives", Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 26(4), pp.337~356 (2023)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)