Capabilities building and alliance security dilemma in post-unipolar world: focusing on the US-Japan and US-Australia alliances
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research explores the causal role of investing in capability building for the sake of managing the security dilemma of abandonment and entrapment dynamics in a post-unipolar era. Allies’ defense burden-sharing efforts are increasingly focused on building their own capabilities to contribute to the evolution of a division of labor with their senior partner and the reshaping of the contours of regional security architecture, which may help alleviate their heightened fear of abandonment by the US. As the junior ally contributes further to the network’s deterrent force, the creation of security networks promoted in bilateral, multilateral, and regional settings would necessarily thicken. Its success depends in part on how well the network’s individual participants are able to emphasize an inclusive concept of security cooperation that would feed directly into the maximization of their strategic autonomy. This would in turn serve to help the junior ally prepare against both the possibility of being dragged into an unwanted conflict with China and against the prospect of America’s withdrawal.
Abstract
This research explores the causal role of investing in capability building for the sake of managing the security dilemma of abandonment and entrapment dynamics in a post-unipolar era. Allies’ defense burden-sharing efforts are increasingly focused on building their own capabilities to contribute to the evolution of a division of labor with their senior partner and the reshaping of the contours of regional security architecture, which may help alleviate their heightened fear of abandonment by the US. As the junior ally contributes further to the network’s deterrent force, the creation of security networks promoted in bilateral, multilateral, and regional settings would necessarily thicken. Its success depends in part on how well the network’s individual participants are able to emphasize an inclusive concept of security cooperation that would feed directly into the maximization of their strategic autonomy. This would in turn serve to help the junior ally prepare against both the possibility of being dragged into an unwanted conflict with China and against the prospect of America’s withdrawal.
참고문헌 (45)
- Art, Robert J., "Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO", Political Science Quarterly, 111(1), pp.1~39 (1996)
- Art, Robert J., "America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration", pp.13~27 (2012), Center for New American Security
- Atanassova-Cornelis, Elena, "The US-Japan Alliance Dilemma in the Asia-Pacific: Changing Rationales and Scope", The International Spectator, 54(4), pp.78~93 (2019)
- Atanassova-Cornelis, Elena, "Reconceptualising the Asia-Pacific Order: Japan’s Response to Strategic Uncertainties in the Era of Trump", Interdisciplinary Political Studies Special Issue: Trump and the Post-American World Order, 4(1), pp.153~183 (2018)
- Beeson, Mark, "Southeast Asian Affairs 2001", pp.44~55 (2001), Institute for Southeast Asian Studies
- Blankenship, Brian, "Control vs. Cost-Sharing : The Dilemma at the Heart of NATO", War on the Rocks, ~ (2018)
- Bush, George W., "Highlights of Accomplishments and Results: The Administration of President George W. Bush 2001-2009" (2009), Morgan James Publishing
- Cha, Victor D., "The Uses of Institutions: The U.S., Japan, and Governance in East Asia", pp.103~130 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan US
- Cha, Victor D., "Complex Patchworks: U.S. Alliances as Part of Asia’s Regional Architecture", Asia Policy, 11, pp.27~50 (2011)
- Tommy Sheng Hao Chai, "How China attempts to drive a wedge in the U.S.-Australia alliance", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(5), pp.511~531 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Fatton, Lionel, "Japan is Back: Autonomy and Balancing Amidst an Unstable China-U.S.-Japan Triangle", Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(2), pp.264~278 (2018)
- Fontaine, Richard, "Networking Asian Security: An Integrated Approach to Order in the Pacific", Center for a New American Security (2017)
- Gill, Bates, "Strategic Asia 2014-15 US Alliances and Partnerships at the Center of Global Power", pp.87~118 (2014), The National Bureau of Asian Research
- Ikenberry, G. John, "The Uses of Institutions: The U.S., Japan, and Governance in East Asia" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan US
- Ikenberry, G. John, "American hegemony and East Asian order", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(3), pp.353~367 (2004)
- Ikenberry, G. John, "Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order", International Security, 23(3), pp.43~78 (1999)
- Jackson, Van, "Strategic Asia 2014-15 US Alliances and Partnerships at the Center of Global Power", pp.317~344 (2014), The National Bureau of Asian Research
- Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, and Defense and Trade, Australia’s Defense Relations with the United States, , Australian Government Publishing Service, ~ (2005)
- Kamiya, Matake, "The US-Japan Alliance: Where From and Where To?", Doing More and Expecting Less: The Future of US Alliances in the Asia-Pacific, Honolulu: Pacific Forum CSIS (2013)
- Kih, Jiyun, "Capability building and alliance cohesion: comparing the US-Japan and US-Philippines alliances", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), pp.355~376 (2020)
- Koga, Kei, "The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan’s Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia’s Power Shift", International Studies Review, 20(4), pp.633~660 (2018)
- Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, "How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China", Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), pp.500~514 (2016)
- Lee, Lavina, "Abe’s democratic security diamond and new quadrilateral initiative: an Australian perspective", The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 30(2), pp.1~41 (2016)
- Malik, Mohan, "Balancing act: the China-India-U.S. Triangle", World Affairs, 179(1), pp.46~57 (2016)
- McDougall, Derek, "Responses to Rising China in the East Asian region: soft balancing with accommodation", Journal of Contemporary China, 21(73), pp.1~17 (2012)
- Medeiros, Evan S., "Strategic hedging and the future of Asia‐pacific stability", The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), pp.145~167 (2006)
- Park, Jae-Jeok, "The Persistence of the US-led Alliances in the Asia-Pacific: An Order Insurance Explanation", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific,, 13(3), pp.337~368 (2013)
- Press-Barnathan, Galia, "Managing the Hegemon: NATO under Unipolarity", Security Studies, 15(2), pp.271~309 (2006)
- Rowberry, Ariana Navarro, "Advanced Conventional Weapons, Deterrence and the U.S.-Japan Alliance" (2014), Brookings Institution Press
- Schoff, James L., "Realigning Priorities: The U.S.-Japan Alliance and the Future of Extended Deterrence" (2009), The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, Inc
- Singh, Bhubhindar, "Minilateralism in the Indo-Pacific: The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Mechanism, and ASEAN" (2020), Routledge
- Snyder, Glenn H., "The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics", World Politics, 36(4), pp.461~495 (1984)
- Snyder, Glenn H., "Alliance Politics" (1997), Cornell University Press
- Er-Win Tan, "Security Hedging Strategies of U.S. Allies and Partners in the Era of Trump: The ROK, Japan and Singapore as Case Studies", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 32(2), pp.163~184 (2020), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- Tran, Thi Bich, "Vietnam’s Post–Cold War Hedging Strategy: A Changing Mix of Realist and Liberal Ingredients", Asian Politics and Policy, 10(1), pp.73~99 (2018)
- Uhr, John, "New Developments in Australian Politics", pp.68~84 (1997), Macmillan Education Australia
- Walt, Stephen M., "Alliances in a Unipolar World", World Politics, 61(1), pp.86~120 (2009)