본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

요가 철학에서 거론하는 소지성(vedyatva) 개념의 함의(含意)

The Implication of Vedyatva Mentioned in Yoga Philosophy

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류철학

초록

Vācaspati Miśra는『요가주』를 해설하면서, ‘동시 지각의 필연성’과 함께 소지성(vedyatva)을 거론하여 유식설을 비판했다. 그 중에서 특히 소지성은 유식설에서 통용되는 특정 개념을 요가 철학의 주석자들이 나름대로 이해하여 대체한 개념일 수 있다. Dharmakīrti와 Śāntarakṣita의 고찰에 의하면, ‘인식의 자기인식’은 ‘동시 지각의 필연성’과 불가피하게 연관되어 있다. 주관(인식 주체)과 객관(인식 대상)이 동일하다는 전제에서 성립된 주장이 ‘동시 지각의 필연성’이다. 여기서는 주관과 동일한 객관을 주관이 인식하므로, 결국 주관이 주관(=객관)을 인식한다는 자기인식의 논리가 성립된다. 그런데 자기인식은 유식의 동의어로 간주될 만큼, 유식설은 자기인식의 이론과 밀접하게 연관되어 사상적 발전을 전개했다. 그렇다면 유식설의 반론자에게 가장 대표적인 표적으로 간주된 것은 인식의 자기인식이었을 것이다. 따라서 유식설을 비판하는 Vācaspati Miśra가 ‘동시 지각의 필연성’과 함께 유식론자의 주장으로 전제한 ‘소지성’은 결국 ‘인식의 자기인식’을 대체한 개념일 것으로 판명된다.

Abstract

Vācaspati Miśra criticizes Yogācāra school in the respect that sahopalambha-niyama(the necessity of being perceived simultaneously) and vedyatva(knowability) are the keywords of Yogācāra doctrine in his comments on Yoga-Sūtra. The two words, however, are rarely found as Yogācāra system’s original terminologies to explain their own doctrine in their texts. If so, it is supposed that the commentators of Yoga-Sūtra tried to understand certain conceptions of Yogācāra’s system as their own terminologies. Especially, in the case of the conception of vedyatva. According to my analysis in this thesis, vedyatva referred by Vācaspati Miśra may clearly turn out to substitute with self-awareness(sva-saṃvedana) in Yogācāra doctrine. Self-awareness to be commented by the great masters of Buddhist epistemology like Dharmakīrti and Śāntarakṣita has inevitable a correlation with the necessity of being perceived simultaneously. The conception of necessity of being perceived simultaneously is proved under the condition of acceptance of the two aspects of cognition; the subjective and the objective, are identified coming from sameness. In the other words, the subjective aspect grapes the objective aspect that must be the same as the subjective, therefore, logically, it is acceptable that the subjective after all figures out its own aspect. Critics against Yogācāra doctrine may consider self-awareness as their main target to denounce. Because Yogācāra school have consistently insisted their original doctrines as developing the thought of self-awareness which is regarded as much as synonymy to vijñapti-mātratā(Consciousness-only). Vācaspati Miśra is deduced that he understood clearly the traditional ideas or views of Yogācāra by considering the fact he was one of opponents against Yogācāra doctrine. Consequently, the meaning of vedyatva in Vācaspati Miśra’s context is undoubted to describe the meaning of Yogācāra’s sva-saṃvedana. It is also indirectly proved through Bāhyārthasiddhi-kārikā of Śubhagupta to criticize the epistemology of both of Sautrāntika and Yogācāra school as deeming the both sects are undifferentiated.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "Bāhyārthasiddhi-kārikā(外境論證頌)", ~ (1967)
  2. "Dharmakīrti의 Pramāṇa-vārttika", ~
  3. "Sarvadarśana-saṃgraha. Mahāmahopādhyāya Vasudev Shastri Abhyankar ed.. Sarva-darśana-saṃgraha of Sāyaṇa-Mādhava Edited with an Original Commentary in Sankrit. Government Oriental Series, Class A, No. 1" (1978), Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute
  4. "Vācaspati Miśra의 Tattva-vaiśāradī", ~
  5. Rajaram Shastri Bodas, "The Yogasūtras of Patañjali with the Scholium of Vyāsa and the Commentary of Vācaspatimiśra, Bombay Sanskrit and Prakrit Series, No. 46", The Government General Press
  6. "Pātañjala-yogasūtrāṇiḥ, Ānandāśrama Sanskrit Series, Vol. 47" (1978), Ānandāśrama
  7. "Śāntarakṣita의 Tattvasaṃgraha. See TSp", ~
  8. "Kamalaśīla의 Tattvasaṃgraha-pañjikā. Swami Dwarikadas Shastri. ed. Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Shāntarakṣita with the Commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Shri Kamalashīla, Vol. 2. Bauddha Bharati Series 2" (1968), Bauddha Bharati
  9. Mayeda Sengaku, "Śaṅkara's Upadeśasāhasrī: Critically Edited with Introduction and Indices" (1973), The Sankibo Press
  10. "Vyāsa의 Yogasūtra-bhāṣya 또는 Yoga-bhāṣya", ~
  11. "Vijñāna Bhikṣu의 Yoga-vārttika. See Rukmani", ~ (1989)
  12. Balcerowicz, Piotr, "Logic and Belief in Indian Philosophy, Warsaw Indological Studies 3", pp.249~360 (2009)
  13. Chakrabarti, Kisor Kumar, "Classical Indian Philosophy of Induction: The Nyaya Viewpoint" (2010), Lexington Books
  14. Chaturvedi, Girdhari Lal, "The Concept of Self-luminosity of Knowledge in Advaita Vedānta" (1982), Adarsha Prakashan
  15. Hattori, Masaaki, "Bāhyārthasiddhikārikā of Śubhagupta", 印度學佛敎學硏究, 8(1), pp.395~400 (1960)
  16. Jha, Ganganatha, "The Tattvasaṅgraha of Shāntarakṣtia: With the Commentary of Kamalashīla, Vol. Ⅱ" (1986), Motilal Banarsidass
  17. Matsumoto, Shiro, "Sahopalambha-niyama", 曹洞宗硏究員硏究生硏究紀要, (12), pp.265~298 (1980)
  18. Mimaki, Katsumi, "Annotated translation of the chapter on the Yogacara of the Blo gsal grub mtha' : Part One", 京都大學文學部研究紀要, 31, pp.1~49 (1992)
  19. Nivās, Śrī Haridās, "Uttamā-bhakti-suddhā-laharī, Issue No. 13" (2013), New Śrī Haridās Nivās
  20. Potter, Karl H., "Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: the Tradition of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa, Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Vol. Ⅱ" (1977), Princeton University Press
  21. Rukmani, T.S., "Yogavārttika of Vijñānabhikṣu, Vol. 4" (1989), Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd
  22. Sastri, N. A., "Bulletin of Tibetology, Vol. Ⅳ, No. 2" (1967), Namgyal Institute of Tibetology
  23. Sastri, P. S., "Panchapadika Vivaranam of Prakasatma Yati" (1997), Sadhana Grantha Mandir
  24. Sinha, Jadunath, "Indian Realism" (1972), Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd
  25. Snellgrove, D. L., "The Hevajra Tantra : A Critical Study" (1959), Oxford University Press
  26. Woods, James Haughton, "Yoga-System of Patañjali Or the Ancient Hindu Doctrine of Concentration of Mind" (1973), Gordon Press
  27. 高木訷元, "古典ヨ-ガ體系の硏究" (1991), 法藏館
  28. 김성옥, "‘자기인식’에 관한 유식학파와 중관학파의 논쟁", 인도철학, (39), pp.235~264 (2013), 인도철학회
  29. 정승석, "요가수트라 주석" (2010), 소명출판
  30. 정승석, "유식(唯識)의 ‘동시 지각의 필연성’ 개념에 대한 요가 철학의 비판", 인도철학, (38), pp.117~149 (2013), 인도철학회
  31. 中村元, "インドの哲學體系Ⅰ, 全哲學綱要譯註Ⅰ 第28卷" (1994), 春秋社
  32. Apte, Vaman Shivaram, "The Student's Guide to Sanskrit Composition: Being a treatise on Sanskrit syntax for the use of schools and colleges" (1908), Oriental Pub. Co
  33. 西澤史仁, "カマラシーラのディグナーガ批判: 唯識性の理解を巡って", インド哲学仏教学研究, 3, pp.17~32 (1995), 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科 文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室
  34. 服部正明, "佛敎學派の無我論に對する批判: クマーリラとウディヨータカラ", 印度哲學佛敎學, (2), pp.333~351 (1987), 北海道印度哲學佛敎學會
  35. 榊亮三郎, "梵藏漢和四譯對校翻譯名義大集 京都帝國大學 文科大學叢書, 第三" (1916), 眞言宗京都大學
  36. 戶崎宏正, "佛敎認識論の硏究" (1985), 大東出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)