본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

실용주의 환경론과 근본주의 생태론의 접점 모색

Toward Shared Grounds Between Environmental Pragmatism and Foundationalist Ecology

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

It is unfair that environmental pragmatism has been regarded as a mouthpiece for industrial expediency and business boosterism. John Dewey’s radical pragmatism known as ‘Instrumentalism’ has provoked ecological fundamentalists’criticism more vehemently than any other pragmatic philosophies. However, most of the presumptive misunderstandings of such critics as Holmes Rolston, J. Baird Calliott, Erich Katz, C. A. Bowers and many others come from their limited or reduced reading of Deweyan pragmatism. The following three aspects of Deweyan pragmatism can work out in opening up a dialogical space with those eco-centrist thinkers mentioned above. First, the concept of Dewey’s ‘primary experience’ can articulate the foundationalist view of nature, which is often found in aboriginal cultures. Second,as Andrew Light points out, ecological essentialism can share its metaphilosophical position with the pragmatist epistemology. While Anthony Weston pursues pluralism, admitting that the foundationalism might be one of the efficient approaches to nature, Eric Katz is also clearly attracted to the metaphilosophical element in Weston’s argument that anyone who attempts to claim the ‘inherent value’ of non-human nature never possibly avoids a pitfall of anthropomorphism. Lastly, in a more comprehensive perspective, Dewey’s pragmatism shows a philosophical complexity, what Larry A. Hickman calls ‘post-postmodernism.’ a dynamic interaction between modernism and postmodernism. Significantly enough, the environmental version of this complexity can procure a meeting ground between foundationalist ecology and the pragmatic view of nature.

Abstract

It is unfair that environmental pragmatism has been regarded as a mouthpiece for industrial expediency and business boosterism. John Dewey’s radical pragmatism known as ‘Instrumentalism’ has provoked ecological fundamentalists’criticism more vehemently than any other pragmatic philosophies. However, most of the presumptive misunderstandings of such critics as Holmes Rolston, J. Baird Calliott, Erich Katz, C. A. Bowers and many others come from their limited or reduced reading of Deweyan pragmatism. The following three aspects of Deweyan pragmatism can work out in opening up a dialogical space with those eco-centrist thinkers mentioned above. First, the concept of Dewey’s ‘primary experience’ can articulate the foundationalist view of nature, which is often found in aboriginal cultures. Second,as Andrew Light points out, ecological essentialism can share its metaphilosophical position with the pragmatist epistemology. While Anthony Weston pursues pluralism, admitting that the foundationalism might be one of the efficient approaches to nature, Eric Katz is also clearly attracted to the metaphilosophical element in Weston’s argument that anyone who attempts to claim the ‘inherent value’ of non-human nature never possibly avoids a pitfall of anthropomorphism. Lastly, in a more comprehensive perspective, Dewey’s pragmatism shows a philosophical complexity, what Larry A. Hickman calls ‘post-postmodernism.’ a dynamic interaction between modernism and postmodernism. Significantly enough, the environmental version of this complexity can procure a meeting ground between foundationalist ecology and the pragmatic view of nature.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 노양진, "상대주의의 두 얼굴" (2007), 서광사
  2. Bowers, C. A, "The Case against John Dewey as an Environmental and Eco- Justice Philosopher", Environmental Ethics, 25(1), pp.25~42 (2003)
  3. Buell,Lawrence, "The Future of Environmental Criticism" (2005), Blackwell Publishing
  4. Dewey, John, "John Dewey: The Later Works13, 1925-1953. V13" (1991), Southern Illinois UP
  5. Dewey, John, "John Dewey: The Later Works1, 1925-1953. V13" (1991), Southern Illinois UP
  6. Dewey, John, "Human Nature and Conduct 1922" (1988), Southern Illinois U P
  7. Dewey, John, "The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899-1924. V9" (1991), Southern Illinois UP
  8. Dewey, John, "Art as Experience" (1980), Perigee Books
  9. Dewey, John, "Experience and Nature" (1958), Dover Publications
  10. Dewey,John, "The Quest for Inquiry" (1938), Henry Holt and Company
  11. Guha, Ramachandra, "Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique", Environmental Ethics, 11, pp.71~83 (1989)
  12. Hickman, Larry A, "Nature as Culture. In: Environmental Pragmatism", pp.50~72 (1996), Routledge
  13. Hickman, Larry A, "Pragmatism As Post-Postmodernism" (2007), Fordham UP
  14. Katz, Eric, "Searching for Intrinsic Value", Environmental Pragmatism, 307~318
  15. Light, Andrew, "Environmental Pragmatism as Philosophy or Metaphilosophy: On the Weston-Katz Debate", Environmental Pragmatism, 325~338
  16. Norton, Bryan G, "The Constancy of Leopold’ Land Ethic", Environmental Pragmatism, 84~102
  17. Oelschlaeger, Max, "The Idea of Wilderness" (1991), Yale UP
  18. Rorty, Richard, "Contingency, irony, and solidarity" (1989), Cambridge UP
  19. Russell, Bertrand, "A History of Western Philosophy" (1972), Simon & Schuster
  20. Steinbeck, John, "To a God Unknown" (1995), Penguin Books
  21. Weston, Anthony, "Beyond Intrinsic Value: Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics", Environmental Ethics, 7, pp.321~339 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)