본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on the Performance of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Process of Revised Bloom Taxonomy

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The main objective of this research is to studying students’ mathematical performance based upon cognitive dimension of Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT). A sample of 95 K11 school girls and 63 K11 school boys were tested on mathematics exam include 120 questions from K11 calculus book based on RBT. Data of this research was analyzed by MANOVA repeated measure and graphs error bars from SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Results obtained, indicate that there was difference between students’ mathematical performance in each category of knowledge dimension according to cognitive process of RBT and students’ mathematical performance would be decreased from remembering through creating in each category of knowledge dimensions. Overall, these findings could help to provide some practical implications for adapting problem solving skills and effective teaching/learning.

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to studying students’ mathematical performance based upon cognitive dimension of Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT). A sample of 95 K11 school girls and 63 K11 school boys were tested on mathematics exam include 120 questions from K11 calculus book based on RBT. Data of this research was analyzed by MANOVA repeated measure and graphs error bars from SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Results obtained, indicate that there was difference between students’ mathematical performance in each category of knowledge dimension according to cognitive process of RBT and students’ mathematical performance would be decreased from remembering through creating in each category of knowledge dimensions. Overall, these findings could help to provide some practical implications for adapting problem solving skills and effective teaching/learning.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Airasian, W., "The role of assessment in The Revised Taxonomy", Theory into practice, 41(4), pp.249~254 (2002)
  2. Alamolhodaei, H., "A Working Memory Model Applied to Mathematical word Problem Solving", Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), pp.183~192 (2009)
  3. Amer, A., "Reflections on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy", Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(1), pp.213~230 (2006)
  4. American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Benchmarks for science literacy" (1993), Oxford University Press
  5. Anderson, L., "Curricular Alignment: A Re-examination", Theory into practice, 41(4), pp.255~260 (2002)
  6. Anderson, L., "Taxonomy for learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy" (2001), Longman
  7. Bloom, B., "Reflection on the Development and Use of the Taxonomy. in: Bloom’s taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective", pp.1~8 (1994), University of Chicago Press
  8. Bloom, B. S., "Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain" (1956), David McKay
  9. Booker, M. J., "A Roof without Walls: Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy and the Misdirection of American Education", Acad. Quest., 20(4), pp.347~355 (2007)
  10. Forehand, M., "Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and Revised" (2005), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology
  11. Frust, E., "Bloom’s Taxonomy: Philosophical and Educational Issues. in: Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective", pp.28~40 (1994), National Society for the Study of Education
  12. Krathwohl, D., "A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview", Theory into Practice, 41(4), pp.212~218 (2002)
  13. Kreitzer, A., "Empirical Investigations of the Hierarchical Structure of the Taxonomy. in: Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty year Retros-pective", pp.64~81 (1994), National Society for the Study of Education
  14. Moenikiaa, M., "A study of simple and multiple relations between mathematics attitude, academic motivation and intelligence quotient with mathematics achievement", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, pp.1537~1542 (2010)
  15. Standards for the English Language Arts, "National Council of Teachers of English", National Council of Teachers of English, ~ (1996)
  16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), "Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics", pp.48~50 (1989), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Reston
  17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), "Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics" (1991), NCTM
  18. Rizvi, N. S., "A synthesis of taxonomies", frameworks used to analyse mathematics curricula in Pakistan, 2007, pp.27(3), 90~95[DOI]
  19. "Bloom’s taxonomy"[URL]
  20. Smith, G., "Constructing mathematical examina-tion to assess a range of knowledge and skills", Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 21(1), pp.65~77 (1996)
  21. Zimmerman, B., "Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. in: Self regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice", pp.1~19 (1998), Guilford Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)