본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동아시아 문화교류와 한국한문학 -15세기 말 문사들의 교류인식을 중심으로-

Cultural Exchange in Eastern Asia and Korean Classical Literature in Hanmun : An Analytical Approach to Outlook On Exchange of Late 15th Century.

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This article aims at reconsidering the problems existing in the cultural exchange in Eastern Asia, especially between Korea, Japan and China which might have exerted influences upon the formation and development of Korean classical literature in Hanmun from the perspectives of the literary men of late 15th century in Chosun. The major problem is about Sino-Barbarian doctrine shown politically or culturally from the three countries. Some literary men of the time did not regard 'sino' and 'barbarian' native, fixed or immutable, believing that they can always be reversed. The spirit considering literary superiority and morality as the true standpoint of the doctrine was deeply steeped in most Korean classical literature. Another one is about direction of reception between the countries: it was general view that literature and learning were transferred from China to Chosun and then from Chosun to Japan. The men of letters, however, looked upon the reception as mutual, not one-sided, and expected Chosun envoys leaving for Ming China to transmit their own culture in order to be of service to China, and learn Chinese resources in the interests of Chosun when returning. In that there were active and frequent mutual exchanges between Eastern countries from the 17th century on, the literary histories of the three countries appear to be thoroughly reviewed.

Abstract

This article aims at reconsidering the problems existing in the cultural exchange in Eastern Asia, especially between Korea, Japan and China which might have exerted influences upon the formation and development of Korean classical literature in Hanmun from the perspectives of the literary men of late 15th century in Chosun. The major problem is about Sino-Barbarian doctrine shown politically or culturally from the three countries. Some literary men of the time did not regard 'sino' and 'barbarian' native, fixed or immutable, believing that they can always be reversed. The spirit considering literary superiority and morality as the true standpoint of the doctrine was deeply steeped in most Korean classical literature. Another one is about direction of reception between the countries: it was general view that literature and learning were transferred from China to Chosun and then from Chosun to Japan. The men of letters, however, looked upon the reception as mutual, not one-sided, and expected Chosun envoys leaving for Ming China to transmit their own culture in order to be of service to China, and learn Chinese resources in the interests of Chosun when returning. In that there were active and frequent mutual exchanges between Eastern countries from the 17th century on, the literary histories of the three countries appear to be thoroughly reviewed.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 金宗直, "佔畢齋集"
  2. 洪貴達, "虛白亭集"
  3. 金馹孫, "濯纓集"
  4. 金誠一, "해사록"
  5. 柳得恭, "古芸堂筆記"
  6. 元仲擧, "乘槎錄"
  7. 기경부, "『조선시선』이 중한문화교류에 미친영향", 아시아문화연구, 6, pp.67~84 (2002)
  8. 정선경, "중국내 『조선시선』 유행의 문학배경", 아시아문화연구, 6, pp.85~109 (2002)
  9. 衣笠安喜, "近世儒學思想史の硏究" (1979), 법정대학 출판부

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)