Care as a Gendered Double Bind in Ruth Kluger’s Still Alive
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines Ruth Kluger’s memoir Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered (2001) through the lens of gendered violence, arguing that compulsory practices of care represent a significant form of violence that creates a gendered double bind: Jewish women experience anti-Semitism while simultaneously being expected to provide care, denied autonomy, and compelled to maintain family bonds that themselves become sources of violence. While Holocaust scholarship has extensively documented the macroscopic violence of Nazi persecution, Kluger’s memoir reveals an equally devastating form of microscopic violence—violence that is exercised mundanely, especially through normative expectations and practices of women’s care. Kluger underscores how patriarchal norms regarding care impose severe psychological and emotional constraints on women. Drawing on Gyanendra Pandey’s framework of routine violence, I argue that Kluger’s Still Alive reveals the double bind of care that constitutes a form of structural violence, where routinized acts of violence deny personhood while masquerading as protection or care. The significance of Still Alive lies precisely in Kluger’s refusal to produce homogeneous victim narratives; Still Alive displays how care itself becomes a mechanism of violence, differentiated from the tendency in 1980s- and 1990s-women’s Holocaust narratives to valorize women’s care as an important strategy for survival. Ultimately, this study highlights Kluger’s scrutiny of violence to attest to a provocative insight into Jewish woman’s Holocaust experiences, revealing that survival requires not just escaping physical violence but also resisting the microscopic violence embedded in gendered expectations of care.
Abstract
This article examines Ruth Kluger’s memoir Still Alive: A Holocaust Girlhood Remembered (2001) through the lens of gendered violence, arguing that compulsory practices of care represent a significant form of violence that creates a gendered double bind: Jewish women experience anti-Semitism while simultaneously being expected to provide care, denied autonomy, and compelled to maintain family bonds that themselves become sources of violence. While Holocaust scholarship has extensively documented the macroscopic violence of Nazi persecution, Kluger’s memoir reveals an equally devastating form of microscopic violence—violence that is exercised mundanely, especially through normative expectations and practices of women’s care. Kluger underscores how patriarchal norms regarding care impose severe psychological and emotional constraints on women. Drawing on Gyanendra Pandey’s framework of routine violence, I argue that Kluger’s Still Alive reveals the double bind of care that constitutes a form of structural violence, where routinized acts of violence deny personhood while masquerading as protection or care. The significance of Still Alive lies precisely in Kluger’s refusal to produce homogeneous victim narratives; Still Alive displays how care itself becomes a mechanism of violence, differentiated from the tendency in 1980s- and 1990s-women’s Holocaust narratives to valorize women’s care as an important strategy for survival. Ultimately, this study highlights Kluger’s scrutiny of violence to attest to a provocative insight into Jewish woman’s Holocaust experiences, revealing that survival requires not just escaping physical violence but also resisting the microscopic violence embedded in gendered expectations of care.
