본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수정과 피드백이 글쓰기에서 동인(動因)이 되는 방식을 위한 탐구

A Study on the Ways to Make Revision and Feedback the Motives of Writing

0

조회

0

다운로드

59

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Revision and feedback create a place to meet with the writings of the learners and communicate with their inner worlds. Revision doesn't just refer to revising a draft by rearranging phrases, correcting a mistake, or improving the vocabulary choices. It's a very "creative job" that should be connected to feedback on its extension. Thus it's critical to approach revision and feedback from the perspective of developing thinking abilities to organize meanings and to implement them throughout the entire process of thinking. Communicating with the text and the reality beyond the text, they should be able to completely reflect and create the "creative force" of writing. From the perspective that writing was the best way in writing education and that revision and feedback were the essential methods to decide the writing quality even though they didn't guarantee the best result, this study focused on the effective teaching and learning strategies with regard to revision and feedback. It pointed out that the essence of revision and feedback was not quantity but quality and that it's necessary for revision and feedback to have a minimal "manual" considering strategies, principles, and tools. It's also noted that revision and feedback were not overall, one-sided delivery of knowledge but "conversational interactions." There are two ways to more activate revision and feedback and to materialize them as the motives of writing education;the first one is to develop tools to vitalize revision and feedback and expand and reinforce programs to connect them with classes. And the other one is to set up a devoted agency of independent status to the overall aspects of writing education and study in connection to actual classes and establish a regular system for revision and feedback under the supervision of the agency.

Abstract

Revision and feedback create a place to meet with the writings of the learners and communicate with their inner worlds. Revision doesn't just refer to revising a draft by rearranging phrases, correcting a mistake, or improving the vocabulary choices. It's a very "creative job" that should be connected to feedback on its extension. Thus it's critical to approach revision and feedback from the perspective of developing thinking abilities to organize meanings and to implement them throughout the entire process of thinking. Communicating with the text and the reality beyond the text, they should be able to completely reflect and create the "creative force" of writing. From the perspective that writing was the best way in writing education and that revision and feedback were the essential methods to decide the writing quality even though they didn't guarantee the best result, this study focused on the effective teaching and learning strategies with regard to revision and feedback. It pointed out that the essence of revision and feedback was not quantity but quality and that it's necessary for revision and feedback to have a minimal "manual" considering strategies, principles, and tools. It's also noted that revision and feedback were not overall, one-sided delivery of knowledge but "conversational interactions." There are two ways to more activate revision and feedback and to materialize them as the motives of writing education;the first one is to develop tools to vitalize revision and feedback and expand and reinforce programs to connect them with classes. And the other one is to set up a devoted agency of independent status to the overall aspects of writing education and study in connection to actual classes and establish a regular system for revision and feedback under the supervision of the agency.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 구자황, "대학 글쓰기 교육을 위한 예비적 고찰", 어문연구, 53 (2007), 어문연구학회
  2. 김복순, "비판적 사고론의 한계와 ‘통합적 말글쓰기’의 전망", 현대문학의연구, 30 (2006), 한국문학연구학회
  3. 석주연, "學術的 글쓰기의 評價에 대한 일고찰-大學 新入生의 論證文과 調査報告書를 중심으로-", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.493~520 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
  4. 손동현, "인문교양교육의 의미와 과제", 인문과학, 37 (2006), 성균관대학교 인문과학연구소
  5. 원진숙, "대학생들의 글쓰기 실태와 지도 방안", 새국어생활, 9(4) (1999), 국립국어원
  6. 원진숙, "대학생들의 학술적 글쓰기 능력 신장을 위한 작문교육 방법", 어문논집, (51) (2005), 민족어문학회
  7. 이재승, "글쓰기 교육의 원리와 방법" (2002), 교육과학사
  8. 이태준, "문장강화" (2005), 창비
  9. 임칠성, "통합논술 첨삭지도 방법 고찰", 새국어교육, (74) (2006)
  10. 정희모, "글쓰기 교육과 협력학습" (2006), 삼인
  11. 정희모, "글쓰기에서 수정(Revision)의 절차와 방법에 관한 연구 - 인지적 관점을 중심으로", 현대문학의 연구, 34(34), pp.333~360 (2008), 한국문학연구학회
  12. 최규수, "첨삭지도의 원론적 방식과 효율적인 지도 방법의 제안", 이화어문논집, 19 (2001), 이화어문학회
  13. Barbara Kroll, "제2언어 작문" (2003), 강남대학교출판부
  14. Cherry Campbell, "제2언어작문교수" (2004), 경문사
  15. Coffin, E, "Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education" (2003), Routledge
  16. Ilona Leki, "Academic Writing: Exploring Process and Strategies, second edition" (1998), University Press
  17. James Crosswhite, "이성의 수사학" (2001), 고려대출판부
  18. Jim Blasingame, "Teaching Writing in Middle and Secondary Schools" (2005), Pearson Education
  19. Linda Flower, "글쓰기 문제해결전략" (1998), 동문선
  20. "시카고대학 글쓰기센터 홈페이지"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)