김혜순 시에 나타난 여성 억압의 근원과 대응 양상
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at searching an ambivalent reason of oppression of women from the texts of Kim Hye-Soon, an intelligent woman writer, and finding the author's ways of response corresponding with it. Kim Hye-Soon, having focused on the correspondence between women and the world constantly, builds up her texts through overthrowing the usual relations of the world. This is the strategy to expose that the reason of oppression of women basically lies in men of the patriarchal society by making the antagonistic structure between men and women clearly. Particularly her eyes considering father and children as the source of oppression of women reflect the idea that oppression of women is overlapped at home and in the world at the same time. Kim Hye-Soon does not recognize the source of oppression of women as only men. It is significant that she does not always deify woman-mother as a sacrificing existence even though she searches the source of femininity from Barideggi mythology. This is Kim Hye-Soon' awareness that oppression of women is considerably responsible for women themselves and her self-reflection that a new way of corresponding with women's problems is necessary lies in her awareness. Upon a premise that the reason of oppression of women is not only limited to the patriarchal world symbolized by father and children but also even women themselves could be the reason of oppression of women, she suggests 'fighting physically' as a solution to solve women's problems. Especially finding out the source of oppression from women themselves means her awareness does not merely find ways of solving problems through women's solidarity. In other words, in order to make women's solidarity possible, an individual woman should keep her own position with a sense of independence and it means the thorough understanding of women's reality should be preceded. This can be considerably in forward motion in that it is not an emotional response to solve this problem.
Abstract
This study aims at searching an ambivalent reason of oppression of women from the texts of Kim Hye-Soon, an intelligent woman writer, and finding the author's ways of response corresponding with it. Kim Hye-Soon, having focused on the correspondence between women and the world constantly, builds up her texts through overthrowing the usual relations of the world. This is the strategy to expose that the reason of oppression of women basically lies in men of the patriarchal society by making the antagonistic structure between men and women clearly. Particularly her eyes considering father and children as the source of oppression of women reflect the idea that oppression of women is overlapped at home and in the world at the same time. Kim Hye-Soon does not recognize the source of oppression of women as only men. It is significant that she does not always deify woman-mother as a sacrificing existence even though she searches the source of femininity from Barideggi mythology. This is Kim Hye-Soon' awareness that oppression of women is considerably responsible for women themselves and her self-reflection that a new way of corresponding with women's problems is necessary lies in her awareness. Upon a premise that the reason of oppression of women is not only limited to the patriarchal world symbolized by father and children but also even women themselves could be the reason of oppression of women, she suggests 'fighting physically' as a solution to solve women's problems. Especially finding out the source of oppression from women themselves means her awareness does not merely find ways of solving problems through women's solidarity. In other words, in order to make women's solidarity possible, an individual woman should keep her own position with a sense of independence and it means the thorough understanding of women's reality should be preceded. This can be considerably in forward motion in that it is not an emotional response to solve this problem.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김혜순, "또 다른 별에서" (1981), 문학과지성사
- 김혜순, "아버지가 세운 허수아비" (1985), 문학과지성사
- 김혜순, "우리들의 陰畵" (1990), 문학과지성사
- 김혜순, "나의 우파니샤드, 서울" (1994), 문학과지성사
- 김혜순, "불쌍한 사랑기계" (1997), 문학과지성사
- 고미숙, "들뢰즈와 문학기계" (2002), 소명출판
- 김용희, "김혜순 시에 나타난 여성 신체와 여성 환상 연구", 한국문학이론과 비평, 8(1), pp.310~333 (2004), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 김향라, "한국 현대 페미니즘시 연구: 고정희·최승자·김혜순의 시를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2010
- 김혜순, "여성이 글을 쓴다는 것은" (2002), 문학동네
- 나희덕, "다성적 공간으로서의 몸?김혜순론?", 현대문학의 연구, 20, pp.307~328 (2003), 한국문학연구학회
- 신진숙, "김혜순의 시에 나타난 몸적 주체와 탈근대성 고찰", 페미니즘연구, 9(2), pp.197~232 (2009), 한국여성연구소
- 양은창, "김혜순 시에 나타난 신체 지칭어의 성격", 어문연구, 56, pp.503~523 (2008), 어문연구학회
- 엄경희, "질주와 산책" (2003), 새움
- 엘리자베스 그로츠, "뫼비우스 띠로서의 몸" (2001), 여이연
- 이송희, "김혜순 시의 몸 상상력과 의미구조", 호남문화연구, (36), pp.159~182 (2005), 전남대학교 호남문화연구소
- 이주영, "김혜순 시의 몸 이미지에 대한 고찰", 석사, pp.2000
- 이화어문학회, "우리문학의 여성성·남성성" (2001), 월인
- 정끝별, "오룩의 노래" (2001), 하늘연못
- 정문순, "어머니, 영원한 타자의 이름인가?: 나희덕과 김선우 시의 모성적 인식에 대해", 오늘의 문예비평, (44), pp.172~190 (2002)
- 한국기호학회, "몸의 기호학" (2002), 문학과지성사
- 한국여성연구소, "여성의 몸" (2005), 창비
- 호미 바바, "문화의 위치" (2003), 소명출판
- 홍덕선, "몸과 문화" (2010), 성균관대학교출판부
