수사절차와 시민참여 - 경찰 수사절차를 중심으로 -
Civil Participation in Criminal Investigation - Focused on Police Investigation Procedure -
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, many people have doubt, whether the prosecutorial power has been properly exercised. It seems that the dissatisfaction of people with the abuse of prosecutors' power is day by day increasing. The checking system over the prosecutorial process, for example, application for judicial review on non indictment (quasi prosecution), reviewing committee on non indictment has worked, but it is not sufficient for the control over the improper exercise of prosecutorial power. Therefore, as the alternative of the existing control system, we give attention to the civil participation in the prosecutorial procedure. The civil participation in the criminal process is important in two ways, in the first place the fair exercise of prosecutorial power can be guaranteed, and secondly the self management of their own things can be realized. The good examples of civil participation in the prosecution are the gran jury system and the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. With the recent introduction of civil participation in the criminal trials in Korea, many people have interest in the civil control and participation in the criminal procedure. In Korea, the civil committee on prosecution was introduced in the prosecutorial office last year and three reform bills for the introduction of civil control system were submitted to the legislature. In these kinds of attempts at the control over the prosecutorial power through the civil participation, two new systems should be considered. The first one is the post civil reviewing system on the non indictment, and we can make a model of the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. The second one is the pre civil reviewing committee on the prosecution after the model of the grand jury system in the U.S. and this system can contribute to prevent improper prosecution and the evasion or delay of prosecution.
Abstract
Recently, many people have doubt, whether the prosecutorial power has been properly exercised. It seems that the dissatisfaction of people with the abuse of prosecutors' power is day by day increasing. The checking system over the prosecutorial process, for example, application for judicial review on non indictment (quasi prosecution), reviewing committee on non indictment has worked, but it is not sufficient for the control over the improper exercise of prosecutorial power. Therefore, as the alternative of the existing control system, we give attention to the civil participation in the prosecutorial procedure. The civil participation in the criminal process is important in two ways, in the first place the fair exercise of prosecutorial power can be guaranteed, and secondly the self management of their own things can be realized. The good examples of civil participation in the prosecution are the gran jury system and the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. With the recent introduction of civil participation in the criminal trials in Korea, many people have interest in the civil control and participation in the criminal procedure. In Korea, the civil committee on prosecution was introduced in the prosecutorial office last year and three reform bills for the introduction of civil control system were submitted to the legislature. In these kinds of attempts at the control over the prosecutorial power through the civil participation, two new systems should be considered. The first one is the post civil reviewing system on the non indictment, and we can make a model of the Reviewing Committee on Prosecution in Japan. The second one is the pre civil reviewing committee on the prosecution after the model of the grand jury system in the U.S. and this system can contribute to prevent improper prosecution and the evasion or delay of prosecution.
참고문헌 (42)
- 경찰청, "경찰수사 혁신 Vision과 로드맵", 브리핑 자료, ~ (2005)
- 성폭력 피해아동 조사시 전문가 참여제도, "경찰청", ~ (2012)
- 소년범 조사시 전문가 참여제 운영, "경찰청", ~ (2012)
- 경찰청, "‘수사관 교체요청 제도’ 시행 100일", 브리핑 자료, ~ (2011)
- 경찰청, "수사 이의제도" (2012)
- 김병수, "국민참여재판의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 23(1), pp.35~64 (2011), 한국형사정책학회
- 김성돈, "회복적 사법형 형사조정제도의 법제화 방안*", 성균관법학, 21(2), pp.261~305 (2009), 법학연구소
- 소년범 수사시 전문가 참여제도에 관한 연구, "김재봉", ~ (2005)
- 김재희, "현행 범죄피해자보호법상 형사조정제도의 검토", 피해자학연구, 19(1), pp.261~286 (2011), 한국피해자학회
- 남미애, "소년사법처리과정 청소년의 스트레스 반응과 교정성에 검？경찰 및 일반인의 사회적 지지가 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 矯正硏究, 14, pp.113~141 (2002), 한국교정학회
- 검찰개혁방안, "대검찰청", ~ (2010)
- 검찰시민위원회가 전국적 구성을 완료하고 검사의 중요결정을 직접심사하고 있습니다, "대검찰청", ~ (2010)
- 박상열, "미국의 배심제도에 관한 소고 - 기소배심을 중심으로-", 사법행정 (2002)
- 박성철, "현행 형사조정제도에 대한 비판적 소고", 法學論文集, 34(3), pp.129~152 (2010), 법학연구원
- 박정성, "형사절차상 피해자－가해자의 조정제도", 법학논총, 26(2), pp.53~78 (2009), 법학연구소
- 옥선기, "수사절차상 국민참여제도에 대한 비교법적 고찰", 형사법의 신동향, 통권 : 14 (2008)
- 윤영철, "검찰개혁방안(2010. 6. 11)의 문제점과 개선방향에 대한 소고", 조선대 법학논총, 17(2) (2010)
- 이금옥, "국민참여재판의 시행상의 문제점과 개선방안", 공법학연구, 9(4), pp.135~160 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계 구축(I) 형사조정프로그램에 대한실증적 평가 분석, "이동원", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 이성식, "사회내처우 비행소년과 시설내 처우 비행소년의 재범가능성에 대한 비교연구", 형사정책, (9) (1997)
- 이수정, "경찰에서의 소년범다이버전을 위한 재범위험성평가절차" (2004), 청소년선도 및 전과자줄이기 세미나
- 이수정, "국내 형사재판에서의 전문심리위원 활용실태: 심리학 분야 전문가를 중심으로", 한국경찰연구, 9(2), pp.137~160 (2010), 한국경찰연구학회
- 이순래, "소년전환처우의 활성화방안에 관한 연구", 소년법연구, (창간) (2002)
- 이정원, "우리나라 형사조정제도의 시행 현황과 개선방향", 법조, 60(5)통권 : 656, pp.5~32 (2011), 법조협회
- 법제사법위원회 수석전문위원 범죄피해자보호법 전부개정안(정부) 검토보고서, "이한규", ~ (2009)
- 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 장규원, "형사조정제도의 실효성 확보방안 연구", 피해자학연구, 16(2), pp.31~50 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 전지연, "경찰 다이버젼의 도입필요성과 그 내용", 형사정책, 16(2), pp.187~207 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
- 청소년비행예방을 위한 소년보호기관의 역할 확대 및 강화방안, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 참여연대 사법감시센터, "검찰 자체개혁안 발표에 대한 논평", ~ (2010)
- 최영승, "현행 형사화해제도의 실태와 문제점", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.69~92 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계의 구축(I), 주요 외국의 형사화해조정 운용 및 평가에 관한 연구, "탁희성", 한국형사정책연구, ~ (2008)
- 황규진, "갈등해결기법의 경찰업무 적용방안에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 11(3), pp.152~177 (2011), 경찰대학
- Christopher Murphy, "McKenna" (2010)
- "Victims' Experiences with, Expectations and Perceptions of Restorative Justice: A critical Review of the Literature, 3. Victims Participating in Restorative Justice Programs, 3.1 Diversion"[URL]
- Deter Finn, "Civilian Review of Police" (2001)
- "Victim-Offender Mediation"[URL]
- Law comment, "The Mediation Act", pp.445~ (2002)
- Richard J. Lundman, "Prevention and Control of Juvenile Delinquency" (2001)
- Territo, L.․, "Crime and Justice in America" (2004)
- United Nations Office on Drug and Crime, "Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes" (2006)
- Youth Justice Board, "Youth Offending Team, Who ar they? What do they do?" (2004), Who ar they? What do they do?