한국어에 과연 관계절이 존재 하는가: 분사절 분석
Are There Relative Clauses in Korean?: A Participle Clause Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
19
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There have been many different approaches to the analysis of Korean adnominal clauses, most of which are under the assumption that they are relative clauses. However, they have properties which cannot be attributed to relative constructions. Firstly, the gaps in them are different from those in relative clauses: they have the properties of null anaphors. Secondly, the adnominal clauses do not require gaps: there are some sub-types of adnominal clauses which do not contain any gap associated with the head noun syntactically. Based on these observations, we propose that Korean adnominal clauses should be analysed as a clausal unit participle construction. This approach is a development of those in Matsumoto (1988, 1997) and Comrie (1996, 1998a, 1998b, 2003), on the one hand, and those in Na and Huck (1993), Yoon (2011) and Yeon (2012), on the other. These approaches are emphasizing the role of semantics and/or pragmatics in analyzing adnominal clauses in such languages as Japanese and Korean. Major contributions of this study can be summarized as follows. Firstly, we have provided a unified analysis of Korean adnominal clauses, which deals with “non-regular” adnominal clauses as well. Secondly, we have established a theoretical basis on capturing similarities and differences systematically between relative clauses and participle clauses in analyzing other languages.
Abstract
There have been many different approaches to the analysis of Korean adnominal clauses, most of which are under the assumption that they are relative clauses. However, they have properties which cannot be attributed to relative constructions. Firstly, the gaps in them are different from those in relative clauses: they have the properties of null anaphors. Secondly, the adnominal clauses do not require gaps: there are some sub-types of adnominal clauses which do not contain any gap associated with the head noun syntactically. Based on these observations, we propose that Korean adnominal clauses should be analysed as a clausal unit participle construction. This approach is a development of those in Matsumoto (1988, 1997) and Comrie (1996, 1998a, 1998b, 2003), on the one hand, and those in Na and Huck (1993), Yoon (2011) and Yeon (2012), on the other. These approaches are emphasizing the role of semantics and/or pragmatics in analyzing adnominal clauses in such languages as Japanese and Korean. Major contributions of this study can be summarized as follows. Firstly, we have provided a unified analysis of Korean adnominal clauses, which deals with “non-regular” adnominal clauses as well. Secondly, we have established a theoretical basis on capturing similarities and differences systematically between relative clauses and participle clauses in analyzing other languages.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김민국, "핵어명사의 관계화 제약에 대한 연구", 한국어학, 47, pp.131~162 (2010), 한국어학회
- 申孝弼, "한국어 관계구문의 통사와 의미구조 : 통합문법적 접근", 박사, pp.1994
- 연재훈, "유형론적 관점의 한국어 관계절 연구", 國語學, (63), pp.413~457 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이선우, "한국어 관계절의 회생대명사에 관하여", 어학연구, 20, pp.51~59 (1984)
- 채희락, "접어와 한국어 품사 분류: 품사 재정립 및 띄어쓰기 재고", 언어, 32(4), pp.803~826 (2007), 한국언어학회
- Comrie, Bernard, "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd ed." (1989), Balckwell
- Comrie, Bernard, "The Unity of Noun-modifying Clauses in Asian Languages", Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pan-Asiatic Linguistics, pp.1077~1088 (1996)
- Comrie, Bernard, "Attributive Clauses in Asian Languages: Towards an Areal Typology, In Sprache in Raum und Zeit 2", pp.51~60 (1998), Gunter Narr
- Comrie, Bernard, "Rethinking the Typology of Relative Clauses", Language Design, 1, pp.59~86 (1998)
- Comrie, Bernard, "Typology and Language Acquisition: The Case of Relative Clauses, In Typology and Second Language Acquisition", pp.19~37 (2003), Mouton
- Han, Chung-hey, "Are There ‘Double Relative Clauses’ in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.244~285 (2004)
- Hofmeister, Philip, "Cognitive Constraints and Island Effects", Language, 86(2), pp.366~415 (2010)
- Su-ying Hsiao, "The Nominative", Genitive Alternation in Modern Inner Mongolian Relative Clauses: A Statistical Perspective, 2012, pp.29(2), 351~380[DOI]
- 조미정, "The Structure of Non-Regular Relatives and the Correlation Between Tensed Clause and CP", 언어, 30(1), pp.195~222 (2005), 한국언어학회
- Kang, Young-Se, "Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar", 박사, pp.1986
- Keenan, Edward L., "Relative Clauses, In Language Typology and Syntactic Description II", pp.141~170 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Keenan, Edward L., "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.63~99 (1977)
- 김종복, "On the Mixed Properties of Pseudo Relative Clauses", pp.83~93 (1998)
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "A Head-Driven and Constraint-Based Analysis of Korean Relative Clause Constructions", Language Research, 34(4), pp.767~808 (1998)
- 김민주, "Relevance of Grammar and Pragmaticsto the Relevancy Condition", 어학연구, 44(1), pp.95~120 (2008), 언어교육원
- Kim, Yong-Beom, "Relevancy in Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean", Lingua, 112, pp.541~559 (2002)
- Lehmann, Christian, "On the Typology of Relative Clauses", Linguistics, 24, pp.663~683 (1986)
- Matsumoto, Yoshiko, "Semantics and Pragmatics of Noun-modifying Constructions in Japanese", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics, 14, pp.166~175 (1988)
- Matsumoto, Yoshiko, "Noun-Modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame-semantic Approach" (1997), Benjamins
- Na, Younghee, "On the Status of Certain Island Violations in Korean", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, pp.181~229 (1993)
- Nambu, Satoshi, "Nominative", genitive Alternation in Japanese: Theoretical Implications of a Quantitative Study, 2010, ~
- Nikolaeva, I., "Relative Clauses, In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed" (2006), Elsevier
- Song, Jae Jung, "Korean Relative Clause Constructions: Conspiracy and Pragmatics", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 11, pp.195~220 (1991)
- Tallerman, Maggie, "Understanding Syntax, 3rd ed" (2011), Hodder Education
- Yang, Dong-Whee, "Island Constraints and pro-deletion Phenomena in Korean", Language Research, 9(2), pp.144~161 (1973)
- Yoon, James, "The Semantics of Relative Clauses in Korean", Japanese, 1995, pp.4, 413~428[DOI]
- 윤정미, "Double Relativization in Korean - An Explanation Based on the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 언어, 36(1), pp.157~193 (2011), 한국언어학회