영어와 한국어의 개념적 은유에 사용된 근원영역의 보편성에 관한 연구: 워드넷의 명사 최상위 범주를 중심으로
A Research on the Universality of Source Domains in English and Korean Conceptual Metaphors in Terms of Wordnet’s Noun Top-level Categories
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the conceptual metaphor theory, metaphor is regarded as not simply a device for rhetorical ornamentation, but an important process that affects concept formulation. For this reason, Korean and English conceptual metaphors have been compared in previous studies; however, only certain target domains have been investigated. In addition, since most samples of metaphorical expressions were made by the researchers themselves from their experience, their studies seem to have included their prejudice. In order to compensate for these two weak points, on the one hand, Wordnet’s top-level nouns were used as their target domains in the two languages to find out whether there is any universality in the source domains; on the other, data were collected from the 21st Sejong Corpus and the Open American National Corpus. From the corpora, concordances of the top-level nouns were extracted and then were examined to check whether they were used metaphorically. The results showed that the universality in the source domains varies according to the target domains
Abstract
In the conceptual metaphor theory, metaphor is regarded as not simply a device for rhetorical ornamentation, but an important process that affects concept formulation. For this reason, Korean and English conceptual metaphors have been compared in previous studies; however, only certain target domains have been investigated. In addition, since most samples of metaphorical expressions were made by the researchers themselves from their experience, their studies seem to have included their prejudice. In order to compensate for these two weak points, on the one hand, Wordnet’s top-level nouns were used as their target domains in the two languages to find out whether there is any universality in the source domains; on the other, data were collected from the 21st Sejong Corpus and the Open American National Corpus. From the corpora, concordances of the top-level nouns were extracted and then were examined to check whether they were used metaphorically. The results showed that the universality in the source domains varies according to the target domains
참고문헌 (13)
- 김도훈, "한국어-영어 감정 은유의 개념화 과정 및 한영 번역", 영어영문학21, 24(3), pp.99~120 (2011), 21세기영어영문학회
- 김철규, "한국어 형용사 ‘착한’의 연어(collocation)에 관한 단기 통시적 고찰", 언어과학, 19(4), pp.65~87 (2012), 한국언어과학회
- 김태헌, "개념적 은유와 문화적 맥락: 영어와 한국어의 개념적 사랑 은유를 중심으로", 언어학, 16(1), pp.129~150 (2008), 대한언어학회
- 노진서, "영어와 한국어의 은유의 보편성 - 신체 표현을 중심으로 -", 이중언어학, (29), pp.125~143 (2005), 이중언어학회
- 박영순, "은유의 의미를 통해서 본 생각(idea)의 개념화에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 7, pp.49~66 (2000)
- 송부선, "영어와 한국어에서의 ‘화’와 ‘행복’ 은유", 한국어 의미학, 20, pp.121~137 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 오상석, "한국어와 영어의 ‘두려움’ 개념화의 보편성과 특수성 연구", 한국어 의미학, 44, pp.141~170 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- Charteris-Black, J., "Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis" (2004), Palgrave
- Kövecses, Z., "Metaphor : A Practical Introduction" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Lakoff, G., "The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning", pp.41~90 (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphor We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Miller, A., "Introduction to Wordnet: An On-line Lexical Database", pp.10~25
- "Wordnet: A Lexical Database for English" (2010)[URL]