본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Corpus-Based Metaphor-Theoretical Study of Literal vs. Figurative Meanings of Some Korean Lexical Items

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In cognitive linguistics, metaphor theory has been widely adopted in characterizing metaphorical use of many lexical words, claiming that figurative meanings can be explained in terms of the mapping between the terms in the target domain and those in the source domain. In recent years, Deignan (2005) claims that many metaphors proposed in MT should be supported or modified by empirical evidence deriving from corpus-based research (cf. Stefanowitsch & Gries 2006). Adopting this claim, the present research shows to what extent lexical items are metaphorical meanings, showing different degree of metaphoricity. More specifically, first, this study examines and compares the frequency rates of some lexical items such as body terms (meli ‘head’, kasum ‘chest/breast’, and tali ‘leg’), the synonymous words for fruit yelmay, kwail, and kwasil, and other concrete nouns such as kewul ‘mirror’ and ppwuli ‘root’ in the Sejong Corpus. Examination shows different degrees of the use of literal vs. non-literal meanings of the lexical items in question. Second, this research examines co-occurrence relations of the lexical items with predicates or modifying elements, showing examples of non-literal or figurative uses of the lexical items. Third, this research shows metaphors which are at work for the lexical items in question based on the examination of co-occurrence relations. Examination shows that many abstract notions in the target domains are expressed in terms of the concrete terms in the source domain, supporting the claim the figurative meanings are metaphorically extended meanings. In sum, this paper argues for the need of corpus-based research as empirical evidence 158 Haeyeon Kim for proper understanding and explaining the figurative meanings of lexical items.

Abstract

In cognitive linguistics, metaphor theory has been widely adopted in characterizing metaphorical use of many lexical words, claiming that figurative meanings can be explained in terms of the mapping between the terms in the target domain and those in the source domain. In recent years, Deignan (2005) claims that many metaphors proposed in MT should be supported or modified by empirical evidence deriving from corpus-based research (cf. Stefanowitsch & Gries 2006). Adopting this claim, the present research shows to what extent lexical items are metaphorical meanings, showing different degree of metaphoricity. More specifically, first, this study examines and compares the frequency rates of some lexical items such as body terms (meli ‘head’, kasum ‘chest/breast’, and tali ‘leg’), the synonymous words for fruit yelmay, kwail, and kwasil, and other concrete nouns such as kewul ‘mirror’ and ppwuli ‘root’ in the Sejong Corpus. Examination shows different degrees of the use of literal vs. non-literal meanings of the lexical items in question. Second, this research examines co-occurrence relations of the lexical items with predicates or modifying elements, showing examples of non-literal or figurative uses of the lexical items. Third, this research shows metaphors which are at work for the lexical items in question based on the examination of co-occurrence relations. Examination shows that many abstract notions in the target domains are expressed in terms of the concrete terms in the source domain, supporting the claim the figurative meanings are metaphorically extended meanings. In sum, this paper argues for the need of corpus-based research as empirical evidence 158 Haeyeon Kim for proper understanding and explaining the figurative meanings of lexical items.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Barcelona, Antonio, "Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  2. Berndt, E., "The heart of things: A conceptual metaphoric analysis of heart and related body parts in Thai, Japanese and English", ~
  3. Biber, Douglas, "Corpus Linguistics" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  4. Cruse, D. A., "Lexical Semantics" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  5. Deignan, Alice, "Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics" (2005), John Benjamins
  6. Deignan, Alice, "The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought", pp.280~294 (2008), Cambridge University Press
  7. Dirven, René, "Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., "The Poetics of Mind" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  9. Hunston, Susan, "Pattern Grammar" (2000), John Benjamins
  10. Johnson, Mark, "The Body in the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  11. Johnson, Mark, "The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding" (2007), The University of Chicago Press
  12. Kennedy, Graeme, "An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics" (1998), Longman
  13. Kim, Ekjo, "A study of the dictionary treatment and contrastive aspects of ‘nophta", nacta’ ‘high, Language Science Research, pp.2008, 45[DOI]
  14. 김억조, "사전 기술과 말뭉치의 ‘넓다", 좁다’ 의미 대립 연구, 2009, pp.(103), 41~63[DOI]
  15. 김해연, "국어 코퍼스에 나타난 '얼굴'의 은유적 의미의 인지언어학적 분석", 언어와언어학, (49), pp.23~46 (2010), 언어연구소
  16. 김해연, "코퍼스에서의 어휘 ‘가깝다’의 의미와 용법 분석", 담화와 인지, 18(3), pp.65~88 (2011), 담화·인지언어학회
  17. 김해연, "말뭉치 분석을 통한 ‘멀다’의 의미와 용법 연구", 언어학, (61), pp.61~84 (2011), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  18. 김해연, "텍스트 상에서의 동음이의어: 국어 말뭉치에서의 ‘다리’ 분석을 중심으로", 언어, 36(4), pp.903~924 (2011), 한국언어학회
  19. 김해연, "국어 말뭉치에서의 ‘넓다’의 의미와 용법 분석", 언어와언어학, (54), pp.125~154 (2012), 언어연구소
  20. 김해연, "말뭉치에서의 ‘낮다’의 용례와 의미 연구", 언어, 37(1), pp.107~129 (2012), 한국언어학회
  21. 김해연, "문어 말뭉치에서의 ‘뿌리’의 용례와 의미 분석", 텍스트언어학, 32, pp.25~56 (2012), 한국텍스트언어학회
  22. 김해연, "국어 말뭉치에 나타나는 ‘열매’, ‘과일’, ‘과실’의의미와 용법에 대한 비교 분석", 한국어 의미학, 42, pp.463~494 (2013), 한국어의미학회
  23. 김해연, "국어 말뭉치에 나타난 ‘거울’의 의미 분석", 텍스트언어학, 36, pp.121~148 (2014), 한국텍스트언어학회
  24. 김해연, "국어 문어 말뭉치 분석을 통한 ‘머리’와 ‘꼬리’의 의미 비교 연구", 한국어 의미학, 44, pp.59~88 (2014), 한국어의미학회
  25. 김해연, "국어 문어 말뭉치에 나타난 ‘혀’의 의미와 용법 분석", 언어와언어학, (64), pp.31~56 (2014), 언어연구소
  26. 김해연, "국어 기본 색채어와 파생어의 의미와 용법에 대한 코퍼스언어학적 분석", 언어, 39(4), pp.749~771 (2014), 한국언어학회
  27. 김준기, "척도 형용사의 다의성 연구", 새국어교육, (67), pp.119~142 (2004), 한국국어교육학회
  28. Kövecses, Zoltan, "Metaphor : A Practical Introduction" (2002), Oxford University Press
  29. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  30. Lakoff, George, "Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought" (1999), Basic Books
  31. Lakoff, George, "More than Cool Reason" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
  32. Lakoff, George, "Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  33. Lakoff, Georg, "Metaphor and Thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  34. Langacker, Ronald W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I" (1987), Stanford University Press
  35. Langacker, Ronald W., "Concept, Image, and Symbol" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  36. Langacker, Ronald W., "Cognitive Grammar: An Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
  37. Niemeier, Susanne, "Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads:A Cognitive Perspective", pp.195~214 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  38. Perez, Regina Gutiérrez, "A cross-cultural analysis of heart metaphors", Revista Alicantian de Estudios Ingleses, 21, pp.25~56 (2008)
  39. Steen, Gerald J., "Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage" (2007), John Benjamins
  40. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, "Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
  41. Taylor, John, "Cognitive Grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press
  42. Teubert, Wolfgang, "Corpus Linguistics" (2007), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)