프랑스어의 Cataphore에 대한 연구
A Study on the Cataphora in French
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Up to recently, the cataphora has not been the object of a theoretic reflection because its characteristics are subject to the functions of pronouns. According to a variety of its concepts introduced in Maillard, Bally and Dubois, the term "cataphora" designates every kind of contextual dependancy. Each example of cataphora has a following common feature: It is necessary to have recourse to the subsequent context in order to find out the referent of indexical expressions. In this study, we observe and verify the following findings: 1. The relation between a cataphora and its subsequent is not related to the syntactic dependancy, but it is a supplementary connection from the semantic point of view. 2. There exist certain types of semantic relation between these two constituents: direct, indirect or co-referential relation. 3. The relation is asymmetrical. In particular, we distinguish a segmental cataphora from a resumptive cataphora after the extension of the subsequent, and an intra-clausal cataphora from a trans-clausal cataphora according to the textual aspect determined by the relation. The confrontation of cataphora with the right dislocation not only makes the status of cataphora transparency-oriented, but also represents the affinity of cataphora with the acts of language. We finally observe that the non-denomination category and the ontological distinction of second or third ordering element could also play an important role in the theory of cataphora.
Abstract
Up to recently, the cataphora has not been the object of a theoretic reflection because its characteristics are subject to the functions of pronouns. According to a variety of its concepts introduced in Maillard, Bally and Dubois, the term "cataphora" designates every kind of contextual dependancy. Each example of cataphora has a following common feature: It is necessary to have recourse to the subsequent context in order to find out the referent of indexical expressions. In this study, we observe and verify the following findings: 1. The relation between a cataphora and its subsequent is not related to the syntactic dependancy, but it is a supplementary connection from the semantic point of view. 2. There exist certain types of semantic relation between these two constituents: direct, indirect or co-referential relation. 3. The relation is asymmetrical. In particular, we distinguish a segmental cataphora from a resumptive cataphora after the extension of the subsequent, and an intra-clausal cataphora from a trans-clausal cataphora according to the textual aspect determined by the relation. The confrontation of cataphora with the right dislocation not only makes the status of cataphora transparency-oriented, but also represents the affinity of cataphora with the acts of language. We finally observe that the non-denomination category and the ontological distinction of second or third ordering element could also play an important role in the theory of cataphora.
참고문헌 (19)
- Bally,C, "Linguistique g??ale et linguistique fran?ise" (1950), Klincksieck
- Bally,C, "Trait?de stylistique fran?ise.Paris:Klincksieck" (1954), Klincksieck
- Corblin,F, "Linguistique g??ale et linguistique fran?ise" (1965), A. Franke
- Corblin,F, "Repr?entation du discours et s?antique formelle" (2002), PUF
- Delaveau,A, "Syntaxe : La phrase et la subodination" (2001), Armand Colin
- Dubois,J, "Analyse des substituts" (1965), Hachette
- H?m? J, "Les formes de reprise dans le discours,Anaphore et cha?e de r??ence" (1995), Presses Universitaire de Rennes
- Joly,A.et Fraser,T, "Le systeme de la deixis(2) : endophore et cohesion discursive en anglais", Modeles lisguistiques, Ⅰ(2), pp.107~109 (1980)
- K?sik,M, "La cataphore" (1989), PUF
- Kleiber,G, "Anaphore et pronoms" (1990), Editions Duculot
- Kleiber, G, "L'anaphore et ses domaines" (1990), Klincksieck. Kleiber
- Koschmieder,E, "E.Benveniste aujourd'hui.Paris" (1984), Bic
- Maillard,M, "Essai de typologie des substituts diaphoriques", Langue franise, 21, pp.56~61 (1974)
- Maillard,M, "Les r??ences g??iques de "?" en grammaire de phrase in Kleiber", ~ (1987)
- Tesni?e,L, "El?ents de syntaxe structurale.Paris:Klincksieck" (1965), Klincksieck
- Wilmet,M, "Les d?erminants en fran?is, essai de synth?e", Langue franise, 57, pp.164~173 (1983)
- Wilmet,M, "La d?ermination nominale" (1986), PUF
- Wilmet,M, "Grammaire critique du fran?is" (1998), Duculot
- Zribi-Hertz,A, "L'anaphore et les pronoms" (1996), Presses Universitaires du Septentrion
