은유의 문화 다양성 기술: 한국어와 영어의 [얼굴] 은유를 중심으로
Description of Cultural Diversity of the Metaphor: With Reference to Korean and English [FACE] Metaphor
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is twofold: One is to describe Korean and English metaphor of [DIGNITY IS FACE] through DAMCA, which Yu(2008, 2013) proposed as a grammar of metaphors to decompose complex metaphors into their primitive components; The other is to examine whether and how Yu's claim on the cultural difference of metaphors holds with DAMCA descriptions of [DIGNITY IS FACE]. Although Korean culture is known to be more concerned about [FACE] than English and its language elaborates [FACE] much more, the DAMCA analysis shows that the two languages share many basic components and mappings of [DIGNITY IS FACE]. Korean [DIGNITY IS FACE] has more mappings between the domains than English does. Yu's claim on the cultural difference of metaphors mostly holds with the DAMCA descriptions of cultural variants of [DIGNITY IS FACE]: They share the basic composition but differ in the additional composition with different numbers of mapping
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold: One is to describe Korean and English metaphor of [DIGNITY IS FACE] through DAMCA, which Yu(2008, 2013) proposed as a grammar of metaphors to decompose complex metaphors into their primitive components; The other is to examine whether and how Yu's claim on the cultural difference of metaphors holds with DAMCA descriptions of [DIGNITY IS FACE]. Although Korean culture is known to be more concerned about [FACE] than English and its language elaborates [FACE] much more, the DAMCA analysis shows that the two languages share many basic components and mappings of [DIGNITY IS FACE]. Korean [DIGNITY IS FACE] has more mappings between the domains than English does. Yu's claim on the cultural difference of metaphors mostly holds with the DAMCA descriptions of cultural variants of [DIGNITY IS FACE]: They share the basic composition but differ in the additional composition with different numbers of mapping
참고문헌 (38)
- 김명운, "현대국어의 공손성 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2009
- 김태호, "영어 ‘head", face’와 한국어 대응어의 다의성 비교 연구, 2014, pp.22(3), 87~109[DOI]
- 김해연, "한국어 코퍼스에 나타난 ‘얼굴'과 관련 어휘의 분석", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.89~110 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회
- 윤정화, "한국어 공손 표현 연구", 박사, 국어교육학과, pp.2014
- 임태섭, "체면의 구조와 체면욕구의 결정요인에 대한 연구", 한국언론학보, 32, pp.205~247 (1994)
- 최상진, "한국인의 체면에 관한 사회심리학적 분석", 사회심리학회지, 2, pp.137~157 (1992)
- 한지형, "신체어 ‘머리’와 ‘얼굴’의 의미확장에 관한 연구", 언어과학, 21(2), pp.173~192 (2014), 한국언어과학회
- Brown, P., "Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Brugman, C., "Cognitive Linguistics : Basic Readings", pp.109~140 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Carr, M., "Chinese"Face"in Japanese and English(Part 1)", The Review of Liberal Arts, 84, pp.39~77 (1992)
- Carr, M., "Chinese"Face"in Japanese and English(Part 2)", The Review of Liberal Arts, 85, pp.69~101 (1993)
- Casasanto, D., "Language and Creative Mind" (2014), CSLI Publications
- Cohen, R., "Negotiating Across Cultures. Communications Obstacles in International Diplomacy" (1977), Institute of Peace Press
- Ervin-Tripp, S., "Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics", pp.43~71 (1995), John Benjamins
- Goffman, E., "On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements of Social Interaction", Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), pp.213~231 (1955)
- Goffman, E., "Interaction Ritual : Essays in Face to Face Behaviour" (2005), Aldine Transaction
- Grady, J., "Theories are Buildings", Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), pp.267~290 (1997)
- Haugh, M., "A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of Face and Politeness in Chinese, English and Japanese", Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp.1581~1611 (2003)
- Hu, H. C., "The Chinese Concept of"Face"", American Anthropologist, 46(1), pp.45~64 (1944)
- Huang S., "Two Studies of Prototype Semantics : Xiao ‘Filial Piety’ and Mei Mianzi ‘Loss of Face’", Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 15, pp.55~89 (1987)
- Kang, K.-H., "Cross-cultural Comparisons of Face in Interpersonal Interaction between Korean and Americans", Speech and Communication, 3, pp.262~282 (2004)
- Kövecses, Z., "Metaphor in Culture : Universality and Variation" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We Live by" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G., "Philosophy in the Flesh : The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought" (1999), Basic Books
- Lakoff, G., "Cultural Models in Language and Thought", pp.195~221 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Maalej, Z., "Embodiment via Body Parts: Studies from Various Languages and Cultures" (2011), John Benjamins
- "Oxford English Dictionary" (1989), Oxford University Press
- Quinn, N., "Cultural Models in Language and Thought", pp.173~192 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Sharifian, F., "Culture, Body and Language" (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
- Shayan, S., "The Thickness of Pitch : Crossmodal Metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec", Senses and Society, 6(1), pp.96~105 (2011)
- Steen, G., "Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage" (2007), John Benjamins
- Yu, N., "The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor : A Perspective from Chinese" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing
- Yu, N., "What does Face Mean to Us?", Pragmatics and Cognition, 9, pp.1~36 (2001)
- Yu, N., "The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought", pp.247~261 (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Yu, N., "From Body to Meaning in Culture : Papers on Cognitive Semantic Studies of Chinese" (2009), John Benjamins
- Yu, N., "A Decompositional Approach to Metaphorical Compound Analysis : The Case of a TV Commercial", Metaphor and Symbol, 26, pp.243~259 (2011)
- Yu, N., "Beijing Olympics and Beijing Opera : A Multimodal Metaphor in a CCTV Olympics Commercial", Cognitive Linguistics, 22, pp.595~628 (2011)
- Yu, N., "Sensuous Cognition: Explorations into Human Sentience: Imagination, (E)motion and Perception", pp.53~74 (2013), Walter de Gruyter