본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Scrambling and PIC: against Cyclic Linearization

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

I argue that Linearization Preservation (LP) based on the cyclic linearization can be replaced by PIC, which means that there is no need appealing to LP to account for the apparent asymmetry observed in the Korean data. I claim that PIC can provide a correct account for the free scrambling, a well known characteristic of the Korean language. I show that either the subject or the object can scramble freely without violation of PIC, and claim that no asymmetry exists between the subject and the object scrambling under the assumption that the examples containing NQs (the so-called floating numeral quantifier constructions) in question can be analyzed in the same way as multiple subject or object constructions, falsifying the idea that a NQ forms a constituent with a subject or object DP preceding it.

Abstract

I argue that Linearization Preservation (LP) based on the cyclic linearization can be replaced by PIC, which means that there is no need appealing to LP to account for the apparent asymmetry observed in the Korean data. I claim that PIC can provide a correct account for the free scrambling, a well known characteristic of the Korean language. I show that either the subject or the object can scramble freely without violation of PIC, and claim that no asymmetry exists between the subject and the object scrambling under the assumption that the examples containing NQs (the so-called floating numeral quantifier constructions) in question can be analyzed in the same way as multiple subject or object constructions, falsifying the idea that a NQ forms a constituent with a subject or object DP preceding it.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in Scrambling and Cyclic Linearization", 38, pp.49~83 (2005), ms., MIT
  2. Ko, Heejeong, "Subject scrambling" (2006), Stanford, Calif. : CSLI Publication
  3. Chomsky, N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework", pp.89155~ (2000), Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press
  4. Chomsky, N, "Derivation by Phase", pp.152~ (2001), Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, N, "Beyond explanatory adequacy", 3, pp.104131~ (2004), Oxford University Press
  6. Chomsky, N., "On Phases" (2005), MIT manuscript
  7. Fox, D., "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure", 31(12), pp.146~ (2005)
  8. Fox, D., "Cyclic linearization and its interaction with other pects of grammar: a reply", 31(12), pp.235262~ (2005)
  9. Huang, C-T. J, "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar" (1998), Garland Publishers New York.
  10. Miyagawa, S.., "Against Optional Scrambling", 28(1), pp.1~25 (1997)
  11. Miyagawa, S, "On the EPP" (2004), Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press
  12. Moon, G-S, "The Predication Operation and Multiple Subject Constructions in rean: Focusing on Inalienable Possessive Constructions", 10(1), pp.239~263 (2000)
  13. Pesetsly, David, "Property Delay: Remarks on "Phase Extension" by marcel den kken" (2007), MIT manuscript
  14. Yoon, "1990 Theta-theory and the grammar of inalienable possession constructions In proceedings of NELS 20", pp.502~516

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)