<임경업전>의 비판의식 연구

Abstract

Although the novel Imgyeongeopjeon deals with the life of a real historical figure, it primarily uses fictional anecdotes rather than actual historical events as its main material. Im Gyeong-eop was executed for treason, but after the reign of King Sukjong, the royal family and ruling class documented and compiled his life to honor his loyalty. Within this context, Im Gyeong-eop's story was also created as a novel centered on fiction. Imgyeongeopjeon not only satisfies the reader's interest in war stories but also serves as a didactic piece by reflecting on the principles of loyalty. The novel guarantees an engaging reading experience by ensuring that villains are punished in the end. Simultaneously, by portraying the incompetence and greed of the ruling class in opposition to the protagonist, the novel reveals the issues of Joseon society at the time. To criticize the ruling class of Joseon, the novel first depicted Im Gyeong-eop's extraordinary qualities. His empathy for the common people and the widespread praise he received were demonstrated through various anecdotes. The narrative not only illustrated his successful execution of administrative duties but also his bravery as a military leader, showcasing his victories in battles. Furthermore, to starkly contrast Im Gyeong-eop's positive traits, the novel exposed the incompetence and irresponsibility of the ruling authorities during times of war. The people suffered because the Joseon king was inept, and corrupt officials held sway in the court, making war inevitable. When national crises arose, the king prioritized his own safety over the welfare of the people, and the officials failed to take any effective action. Imgyeongeopjeon is not merely a heroic novel highlighting the protagonist's military exploits. Instead, it emphasizes his concern for the people and the nation, as well as his outstanding abilities. By contrasting these virtues with the incompetence of the Joseon ruling class, the novel clearly delineates the stark differences between the two sides. Through this contrast, the author incorporates social criticism into the narrative, thereby highlighting the issues within the Joseon political sphere at the time.