본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

벅아이 코퍼스를 이용한 화자의 태도 연구: 담화표지 yeah와 yes를 중심으로

Speaker's Stance Using Buckeye Corpus: Focusing on Discourse Marker yeah and yes

임선희
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2023.05|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제30권 제2호|pp. 21-41|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2023.30.2.021

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

태도agreement긍정stance벅아이 코퍼스yeahyes표준화 잔차청자반응신호Buckeye Corpusstandardized residualsbackchannel
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates the functions of discourse markers yeah and yes used in the Buckeye Corpus and the interaction between these markers and speakers' stance. Firstly, the ambiguous stance discourse functions of yeah and yes are examined based on speakers' stance. Six common functions are identified, including Agreement(AGR), Backchannel(BC), Discourse Boundary(DB), Disagreement(DIS), Ending Discourse(ED), and Solicit(SOL). Secondly, six functions of yeah and yes are analyzed, and the main and non-main stance functions that are commonly found in both yeah and yes are identified. Thirdly, the most frequently used stance functions of yeah and yes are explored in various discourse contexts, namely AGR, BC and DB. There was no example where English marker yes was used as a SOL function. To confirm the significant differences in functions based on speakers' stance, chi-square tests and standardized residuals are conducted, revealing significant differences in the functions of yeah and yes based on speakers' stance.

Abstract

This paper investigates the functions of discourse markers yeah and yes used in the Buckeye Corpus and the interaction between these markers and speakers' stance. Firstly, the ambiguous stance discourse functions of yeah and yes are examined based on speakers' stance. Six common functions are identified, including Agreement(AGR), Backchannel(BC), Discourse Boundary(DB), Disagreement(DIS), Ending Discourse(ED), and Solicit(SOL). Secondly, six functions of yeah and yes are analyzed, and the main and non-main stance functions that are commonly found in both yeah and yes are identified. Thirdly, the most frequently used stance functions of yeah and yes are explored in various discourse contexts, namely AGR, BC and DB. There was no example where English marker yes was used as a SOL function. To confirm the significant differences in functions based on speakers' stance, chi-square tests and standardized residuals are conducted, revealing significant differences in the functions of yeah and yes based on speakers' stance.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 김철규, "신문 경제면 시사용어에 나타난 태도함축 완곡어법의 비판적 담화분석", 언어과학, 26(4), pp.1~29 (2019), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  2. 송경숙, "표준 영어 및 표준 한국어에 대한 한국 대학생들의 언어 태도 및 인식: 언어교육 및 사회언어학적 접근", 언어과학, 22(1), pp.71~93 (2015), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  3. 송인성, "‘네", 예’의 담화 기능과 운율 특성, 2018, pp.81, 169~196[DOI]
  4. 임선희, "영어 yeah, yes와 한국어 ‘예’의 담화기능과 운율의 상호작용 비교", 박사, pp.2018
  5. Alexander M. Baratta, "Revealing stance through passive voice", Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), pp.1406~1421 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Beňuš, Š., "The Prosody of Backchannels in American English", Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences(ICPhS), pp.1065~1068 (2007)
  7. Douglas Biber, "Stance in spoken and written university registers", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), pp.97~116 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. Douglas Biber, "Stance and Grammatical Complexity in Conversation: An Unlikely Partnership Discovered through Corpus Analysis", Corpus Linguistics Research, 1, pp.1~19 (2015), 한국코퍼스언어학회[DOI]
  9. Biber, D., "The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Longman
  10. Brinton, L. J., "Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions 19" (2010), Walter de Gruyter
  11. Chen, Y. -H., "Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing Language", Learning and Technology, 142, pp.30~49 (2010)
  12. Conrad, S., "Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing. Evaluation in Text", Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 56, pp.56~73 (2000)
  13. Kent Drummond, "Some Uses of Yeah", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 26(2), pp.203~212 (1993), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  14. Kent Drummond, "Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 26(2), pp.157~177 (1993), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  15. John W. Du Bois, "The stance triangle", Stancetaking in Discourse, pp.139~182 (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company[DOI]
  16. Freeman, V., "The Phonetics of Stance-taking", Ph. D., pp.2015
  17. Rod Gardner, "The Conversation Object Mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token", Research on Language & Social Interaction, 30(2), pp.131~156 (1997), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  18. Gardner, R., "When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance", Journal of Pragmatics, 33(6), pp.831~846 (2001)
  19. Gibb-Reid, B., "Exploring the Phonetic Variation of Yeah and Like", Journal of English Linguistics, 50(1), pp.48~78 (2022)
  20. Gravano, A., "Backchannel-inviting Cues in Task-oriented Dialogue", Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2009, pp.1019~1022 (2009)
  21. Agustín Gravano, "Affirmative Cue Words in Task-Oriented Dialogue", Computational Linguistics, 38(1), pp.1~39 (2012), MIT Press
  22. Heritage, J., "The Terms of Agreement : Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), pp.15~38 (2005)
  23. Ken Hyland, "Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse", Discourse Studies, 7(2), pp.173~192 (2005), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  24. Jefferson, G., "Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens 'Yeah' and 'Mm hm'", Papers in Linguistics, 16(1), pp.21~36 (1983)
  25. Jucker, A., "Discourse Markers: Description and Theory", pp.171~192 (1998), John Benjamins
  26. Kowtko, J. C., "The Function of Intonation in Task-oriented Dialogue", Ph. D., pp.1996
  27. Lambertz, K., "Back-channelling: The Use of Yeah and Mm to Portray Engaged Listenership", Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 4(1, pp.2) (2011), 11~18
  28. Martin, J. R., "The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
  29. Nilsson, I., "Pragmatic Strategies in Academic English as a Lingua Franca : A Corpus-based Analysis of the Use of the Discourse Markers, Yeah, Okay, and So during Academic Consultations Hours", Journal of Pragmatics, 187, pp.1~15 (2023)
  30. Ochs, E., "Language Socialization across Cultures", pp.251~272 (1986), Cambridge University
  32. Schegloff, E. A., "Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of Uh huh and Other Things that Come between Sentences. Analyzing Discourse", Text and Talk, 71, pp.71~93 (1982)
  33. Lawrence Schourup, "Discourse markers", Lingua, 107(3-4), pp.227~265 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. Wardhaugh, R., "An Introduction to Sociolinguistics" (2014), John Wiley and Sons
  35. Janyce Wiebe, "Learning Subjective Language", Computational Linguistics, 30(3), pp.277~308 (2004), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

말차례 시작에 나타난 담화표지어 연구: 영국 영어 대면 대화 코퍼스를 중심으로최인지언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2021 · 제98호다중담화표지 ‘you know I mean’의 기능에 대한 고찰안병길언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2023 · 제107호영어 담화표지 though에 관한 코퍼스 분석연구배주용, 안동환한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2013 · 제20권 제2호의사결정나무분석 기반 영어 yeah의 운율 특성임선희사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2023 · 제31권 제2호Intensification of Affirmativity: Definitely as a Discourse Marker in Spoken Conversation이정열사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2019 · 제27권 제1호담화 표지어 indeed의 의미화용적 기능에 관한 연구황현미한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2019 · 제26권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

비대면 실시간 수준별 토익 수업이 한국 대학생들의 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향강혜란, 이지연pp. 1-19한국어 반의 관계 의미 확장 연구전정pp. 43-65Politeness and Gender: Male and Female Polite Expressions in Students' Emails안지현pp. 67-89Gender and Age Effects on Korean Sibilants Produced by Jeju Korean Speakers한경임pp. 91-110Korean Students’ Testimonies about their Covid Semesters in General English Classes이강영, 허선민pp. 111-132
원문 보기