본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『리처드 3세』(Richard III)에 나타난 악의 비전: 반복과 고착, 무와 무능

The Vision of Evil in Richard III: Repetition and Being stuck, Nothingness and Ineffectiveness

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper is designed to study the vision of evil in Richard III. The play dramatizes the final demonic phase of civil war, depicting the desperate way the old world ends. In the demonic phase of history, Richard appears as a remainder of radical negativity of old world, which still haunts the present world. In the process of usurping the crown, he repeats and accumulates internecine feud inexorably. The incessant murders he has committed seem to be the very form in which old order survives and haunts the present. Thus, the play suggests the vision of evil as being stuck for all eternity with an abyss and unable to disappear, unable to come to an end, and doomed to eternal repetition. The play also suggests that this vision of evil is no more than that of nothingness and ineffectiveness. At the end, when Richard is defeated by Richmond who represents officially good and divine justice, this vicious cycle of evil is closed. And the play can reach its proper ideological resolution for Tudor myth. But Shakespeare’s stance seems to be divided between sanguine view of Tudor myth and cynical view of it.

Abstract

This paper is designed to study the vision of evil in Richard III. The play dramatizes the final demonic phase of civil war, depicting the desperate way the old world ends. In the demonic phase of history, Richard appears as a remainder of radical negativity of old world, which still haunts the present world. In the process of usurping the crown, he repeats and accumulates internecine feud inexorably. The incessant murders he has committed seem to be the very form in which old order survives and haunts the present. Thus, the play suggests the vision of evil as being stuck for all eternity with an abyss and unable to disappear, unable to come to an end, and doomed to eternal repetition. The play also suggests that this vision of evil is no more than that of nothingness and ineffectiveness. At the end, when Richard is defeated by Richmond who represents officially good and divine justice, this vicious cycle of evil is closed. And the play can reach its proper ideological resolution for Tudor myth. But Shakespeare’s stance seems to be divided between sanguine view of Tudor myth and cynical view of it.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 방승희, "깨어진 환상: 리처드(Richard)의 극 만들기", Shakespeare Review, 50(1), pp.85~107 (2014), 한국셰익스피어학회
  2. Bloom, Harold, "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human" (1998), Riverhead Books
  3. Bonetto, Sandra, "Coward Conscience and Bad Conscience in Shakespeare and Nietzsche", Philosophy and Literature, 30(2), pp.512~527 (2006)
  4. Cahill, Patricia A, "Unto the Breach: Martial Formations, Historical Trauma, and the Early Modern Stage" (2008), Oxford UP
  5. Donaldson, Peter S, "Cinema and the Kingdom of Death: Loncraine’s Richard III", SQ, 53(2), pp.241~259 (2002)
  6. Eagleton, Terry, "On Evil" (2010), Yale UP
  7. Endel, Peggy, "Profane Icon: The Throne Scene of Shakespeare’s Richard III", Comparative Drama, 20(3), pp.115~123 (1986)
  8. French, Marilyn, "Shakespeare’s Division of Experience" (1981), Summit Books
  9. Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare After All" (2004), Anchor Books
  10. Goodland, Katharine, "‘Obsequious Laments’: Mourning and Communal Memory in Shakespeare’s Richard III", Religion and the Arts, 7(1-2), pp.31~64 (2002)
  11. Heller, Agnes, "The Time is Out of Joint: Shakespeare as Philosopher of History" (2002), Rowman & Littlefield
  12. Howard, Jean E, "Engendering A Nation: A feminist account of Shakespeare’s English histories" (1997), Routledge
  13. Jowett, John, "Richard III", pp.1~132 (2000), Oxford UP
  14. Kott, Jan, "Shakespeare Our Contemporary" (1965), Methuen
  15. Oestreich-Hart J, Donna, "Therefore, Since I Cannot Prove a Lover", Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 40(2), pp.241~260 (2000)
  16. Rackin, Phyllis, "Shakespearean Tragedy and Gender", pp.31~53 (1996), Indiana UP
  17. Shakespeare, William, "Richard III. Riverside Shakespeare" (1974), Houghton Mifflin
  18. Slotkin, Joel Elliot, "Honeyed Toads: Sinister Aesthetics in Shakespeare’s Richard III", Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 7(1), pp.5~32 (2007)
  19. Trotter, Jack E, "‘Was Ever Woman in This Humour Won?’: Love and Loathing in Shakespeare’s Richard III", Upstart Crow, 13(1), pp.33~46 (1993)
  20. Žižek, Slavoj, "Violence: Six Sideways Reflections" (2008), Picador

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)