본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)

2

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Ahn & Cho (2005) proposes that some fragmentary utterances in Korean are derived from the full sentential structure via movement and deletion. Right dislocation (RD) in Korean can be analyzed in a similar way to fragments. D. Chung (2009), Kim & Hong (2013), and Ahn & Cho (2014) suggest that RD in Korean has bi-clausal structure (host clause plus appendix clause) and that an RDed phrase undergoes movement to a clause initial position in appendix clause and the rest of the clause undergoes deletion. This type of analysis accounts for the fact that RDed elements and fragments share core properties (cf. D. Chung 2009, 2012a, Kim & Hong 2013). Ko (2014), however, examines the question of whether the RDed elements can be treated in the same way as sentence fragments and argues that RDed elements significantly differ from fragments. This paper aims to defend the parallelism between RDed elements and fragments by reconsidering the data Ko (2014) discusses.

Abstract

Ahn & Cho (2005) proposes that some fragmentary utterances in Korean are derived from the full sentential structure via movement and deletion. Right dislocation (RD) in Korean can be analyzed in a similar way to fragments. D. Chung (2009), Kim & Hong (2013), and Ahn & Cho (2014) suggest that RD in Korean has bi-clausal structure (host clause plus appendix clause) and that an RDed phrase undergoes movement to a clause initial position in appendix clause and the rest of the clause undergoes deletion. This type of analysis accounts for the fact that RDed elements and fragments share core properties (cf. D. Chung 2009, 2012a, Kim & Hong 2013). Ko (2014), however, examines the question of whether the RDed elements can be treated in the same way as sentence fragments and argues that RDed elements significantly differ from fragments. This paper aims to defend the parallelism between RDed elements and fragments by reconsidering the data Ko (2014) discusses.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Ahn, H. -D., (2012), Hankuk Mwunhwasa
  2. 안희돈, "Fragments, Clause Type, and Clausal Architecture", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.201~214 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  3. 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  4. Ahn, H.-D., "Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest", pp.29~62 (2009), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  5. Reconstruction asymmetries in ellipsis: Implication for scrambling, "Ahn, H.-D.", 3~4, pp.Linguistic Analysis: 34 (2010)
  6. 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
  7. Ahn, H.-D., "On some ellipsis phenomena in Korean", Proceedings of the 14th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Three Factors and Syntactic Theory, pp.3~33 (2012), Hankuk Publishing Co
  8. 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, 70(70), pp.25~47 (2012), 현대문법학회
  9. Ahn, H.-D., "Right dislocation in Korean", Talk presented at Seoul National University (2014)
  10. 정대호, "An Elliptical Coordination Analysis of the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean", 언어학, 17(4), pp.1~23 (2009), 대한언어학회
  11. 정대호, "Pre- vs. Post-verbal Asymmetries and the Syntax of Korean Right Dislocated Construction", 생성문법연구, 22(4), pp.703~721 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  12. 정대호, "Is amwu( N)-to a negative quantifier?", 언어연구, 29(3), pp.541~562 (2012), 언어정보연구소
  13. 정대호, "On the nature of null WH-phrases in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.473~487 (2013), 언어정보연구소
  14. Chung, D., "Some notes on Ko's (2014, 2015) hybrid analysis of the Korean RDC", Paper presented at 2015 Spring Conference of Korean Generative Grammar Circle (2015), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
  15. Chung, S., "Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return", Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, pp.73~91 (2005), Department of Linguistics
  16. Chung, S., "Sluicing and logical form", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.239~282 (1995)
  17. Sluicing(:) between structure and inference,' in Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo, Line Mikkelsen and Eric Potsdam (2011) Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, "Chung, S.", California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California, 31~50 (2011)
  18. Kim, S-W., "Hanging topic, pseudo-right dislocation and (pseudo) fragment answers", Talk presented at Occasional Workshop on Ellipsis (2013), Dongguk University
  19. 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.275~310 (2014), 언어교육원
  20. 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean", 어학연구, 51(1), pp.3~40 (2015), 언어교육원
  21. Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  22. Merchant, J, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
  23. Ott, D., "Right dislocation as deletion", 석사, pp.2013
  24. Park, B-S., "Island-insensitivity fragment answers in Korean", WCCFL 24 (2005)
  25. Ross, J, "Guess who?", CLS, 5, pp.252~286 (1969)
  26. Romero, M., "Focus and reconstruction effects in wh-phrases", 박사, pp.1998
  27. Watanabe, A, "The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.551~579 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)