피동 구문의 VP periphery: 한국어의 ‘-에게’ 피동 대 ‘-에 의해’ 피동
VP Periphery in Passive Constructions: -eykey Passives vs. -ey uyhay Passives in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I claim that -eykey passives differ from –e uyhay passives in that the former involves Voice while the latter does not. Four pieces of evidence are provided for the claim: (a) the animacy condition on the subject holds only for the -eykey passive, (b) modification of ilpule ‘on purpose’ is allowed only in the –eykey passive, (c) accusative case is allowed only in the –eykey passive, and (d) nominative case is not allowed only in the long-form negation of the –eykey passive. I further claim that Voice is merged in the –eykey passive as a last resort to save the derivation which would crash when an internal theta-role of a verb is not assigned, which means that subject is base-generated in Spec, VoiceP contrary to the movement analysis (Park 2010, 2013) and that there is no empty category within VP contrary to both the movement analysis and the control analysis (Hoshi 1999, K. Kim 2011, and H. K. Jung 2014, 2016). Finally, the article’s view on the passive is compared with the current views of the Korean passive (Park 2010, 2013) and those of passive in general (Collins 2005 and Breuning 2013).
Abstract
In this article, I claim that -eykey passives differ from –e uyhay passives in that the former involves Voice while the latter does not. Four pieces of evidence are provided for the claim: (a) the animacy condition on the subject holds only for the -eykey passive, (b) modification of ilpule ‘on purpose’ is allowed only in the –eykey passive, (c) accusative case is allowed only in the –eykey passive, and (d) nominative case is not allowed only in the long-form negation of the –eykey passive. I further claim that Voice is merged in the –eykey passive as a last resort to save the derivation which would crash when an internal theta-role of a verb is not assigned, which means that subject is base-generated in Spec, VoiceP contrary to the movement analysis (Park 2010, 2013) and that there is no empty category within VP contrary to both the movement analysis and the control analysis (Hoshi 1999, K. Kim 2011, and H. K. Jung 2014, 2016). Finally, the article’s view on the passive is compared with the current views of the Korean passive (Park 2010, 2013) and those of passive in general (Collins 2005 and Breuning 2013).
참고문헌 (53)
- Alexiadou, Artemis, "External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Aoyagi, Hiroshi, "On the asymmetry in passive between Japanese and Korean", Papers from the 27th National conference of the English linguistic society of Japan, pp.11~20 (2010)
- Baker, Mark, "Passive arguments raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.219~251 (1989)
- Breuning, Benjamin, "By phrases in passives and nominals", Syntax, 16, pp.1~41 (2013)
- 최기용, "장형 부정 구문의 격 교체", 언어, 31(3), pp.441~461 (2006), 한국언어학회
- Choi, Kiyong, "Hankwuke kyekkwa cosauy sayngseng thongsalon (Generative syntax of Korean case and particles)" (2009), Hankwukmuwnhwasa
- 최기용, "UTAH와 공존하는 반례의 성격: 한국어 대격 피동문의 경우", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.37~60 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Choi, Kiyong, "Hankwukeuy nonhang kwuco: light vuy yekhal (Argument structure of Korean: a role of light v)" (2018)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Collins, Chris, "A smuggling approach to the passive in English", Syntax, 8, pp.81~120 (2005)
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Hong, Ki-Sun, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics IV", pp.491~502 (1991), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Move! A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Hoshi, Hiroto, "Theta-role assignment, passivization, and excorporation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.147~178 (1994)
- Hoshi, Horoto, "The handbook of Japanese linguistics", pp.191~235 (1999), Blackwell Publishers
- Im, Hong-Pin, "Kwuke mwunpepuy simchung 3: ehwi pemcwuuy thongsawa uymi", pp.307~332 (1998), Taehaksa
- Jaeggli, Oswaldo, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~633 (1986)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic interpretation in generative grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- 정현경, "Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.201~230 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 정현경, "On the Affected Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.193~221 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Kallulli, Diallina, "Passivization and typology: Form and function", pp.442~460 (2006), John Benjamins
- Kang, Myung-Yoon, "Hankwukeuy hyengthayloncek phi", satong hyensanguy sohyengkwucelkwuco iloncek cepkun (Bare phrase approach to Korean morphological causative, Language Research, pp.1997, 33[DOI]
- Kyumin Kim, "Two Types of Inchoatives in Korean.", 어학연구, 45(2), pp.231~255 (2009), 언어교육원
- Kim, Kyumin, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
- 김윤신, "한국어 동사의 어휘의미구조와 피동화의 제약", 언어학, (30), pp.89~112 (2001), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김윤신, "한국어 기동 동사의 어휘 의미 구조와 생성적 기제", 어학연구, 41(3), pp.493~516 (2005), 언어교육원
- 김윤신, "국어 총칭 피동문의 유형과 의미", 언어학, (68), pp.197~217 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Ko, Yenggeun, "Wulimal mwunpeplon (A Korean grammar)" (2008), Jipmoondang
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Phrase structure and the lexicon", pp.108~136 (1996), Springer
- Kuroda, S.-Y., "Japanese syntax and semantics: Collected papers", pp.183~221 (1992), Kluwer
- Lee, Chungmin, "Abstract syntax and Korean with reference to English", Doctoral, pp.1973
- Lee, Ikseop, "Hankwuke mwunpep (A Korean grammar)" (2004), Seoul National University Press
- Lee, Ikseop, "Kwukemwunpeplon kanguy (Lecture notes on Korean grammar)" (1999), Hakyeonsa
- 이정택, "접미사 피동문의 능동주 표지에 관한 연구", 한글, (258), pp.137~156 (2002), 한글학회
- 이정택, "능동주 표지의 본질과 피동의 범주화", 한글, (262), pp.149~169 (2003), 한글학회
- Lee, Jung-Tag, "Hyentaykwuke phitong yenkwu (A study on the Moderan Korean passive)" (2004), Pakijung
- 목정수, "한국어 피동문의 구조와 가능(potential)의 의미 해석-대조적 관점에서-", 인문언어, 30(8), pp.369~387 (2006), 국제언어인문학회
- Nam, Ki-Sim, "Hyentaykwuke thongsalon (Syntax of Modern Korean)" (2001), Taehaksa
- 남수경, "한국어 피동문의 문법적 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2007
- 남수경, "‘-히-’계 접미사 구문의 한 유형에 대한 고찰 - 한국어 가능 피동의 특성을 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 37, pp.77~102 (2012), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- Kwuke phitong yenkwu (A study on Korean passives), "Pae, Hui-Im", Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University, ~ (1988)
- Park, Sang Doh, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics IX", pp.640~649 (2001), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Korean linguistics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Park, Sang Doh
- 박소영, "한국어 소유 피동문의 두 유형 - 소유물 격 교체와 피동화의 유형론", 國語學, (59), pp.67~102 (2010), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박소영, "한국어 피동문에 나타나는 격 교체의 비대칭성에 대하여", 國語學, (67), pp.195~222 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- Schäfer, Florian, "The verbal domain", pp.129~150 (2017), Oxford University Press
- 최준수, "한국어 수동구문과 사동구문: 어휘적 도출", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.1~68 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Woo, In-Hye, "Wulimal phitong yenkwu (A study on Korean passives)" (1997), Hankwukmuwnhwasa
- Wumbrand, Susi, "The verbal domain", pp.179~204 (2017), Oxford University Press
- Yeon, Jaehoon, "Hankwuke kwumwun yuhyenglon (A typological study on Korean grammatical constructions)" (2011), Taehaksa