본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

(In)animate Subject and Ey or Eykey Marking: With Reference to Morphological Passives

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The by-phrase in English passives is marked either with eykey, ey, or ey uyhay in Korean morphological passives. The ey-marked NP in the morphological passive can be an individual human entity only when it is monosyllabic. The eykey-marked NP in the morphological passive must be animate. However, they have something in common in that they can have an animate or inanimate syntactic subject. The eykey-marked goal in the ditransitive construction and the eykey-marked causee in the morphological causative must be animate. The ey-marked NP in the morphological passive may or may not be animate, while the ey-marked goal or causee must be inanimate. What is more important here is that the morphological passive, the ditransitive construction, and the morphological causative all permit animate or inanimate subjects.

Abstract

The by-phrase in English passives is marked either with eykey, ey, or ey uyhay in Korean morphological passives. The ey-marked NP in the morphological passive can be an individual human entity only when it is monosyllabic. The eykey-marked NP in the morphological passive must be animate. However, they have something in common in that they can have an animate or inanimate syntactic subject. The eykey-marked goal in the ditransitive construction and the eykey-marked causee in the morphological causative must be animate. The ey-marked NP in the morphological passive may or may not be animate, while the ey-marked goal or causee must be inanimate. What is more important here is that the morphological passive, the ditransitive construction, and the morphological causative all permit animate or inanimate subjects.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Chang, S-J., "London oriental and Affrican language library 4: Korean" (1996), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  2. 최기용, "피동 구문의 VP periphery: 한국어의 ‘-에게’ 피동 대 ‘-에 의해’ 피동", 생성문법연구, 28(2), pp.295~346 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  3. 정현경, "Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.201~230 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  4. Kim, H-S., "Ambiguity in the Korean morphological causative", passive, 2003, pp.12, 255~266
  5. Kyumin Kim, "Two Types of Inchoatives in Korean.", 어학연구, 45(2), pp.231~255 (2009), 언어교육원
  6. Klaiman, M. H., "Grammatical voice" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  7. 이두원, "Distributive plural marker tul and its structural licensing", 언어연구, 30(1), pp.67~92 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  8. 이두원, "Syntactic Patterns of Dative or Locative Experiencers and Goals", 영어영문학연구, 61(3), pp.291~314 (2019), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  9. Park, J-W., "Morphological causatives in Korean : problems in grammatical polysemy and constructional relations", Doctoral, pp.1994
  10. 박명관, "On the Identity of -Eykey in Korean Morphological Passives", 생성문법연구, 28(3), pp.513~525 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  11. 박명관, "한국어 부치사 ‘-에게’의 문법화에 대하여", 생성문법연구, 29(2), pp.303~322 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  12. Song, S., "Type hierarchies for passive forms in Korean", Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.250~270 (2007), CSLI Publications
  13. Yeon, J-H, "Korean grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning: Vo1. 1 of Saffron Korean linguistics series" (2003), Saffron Books

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)