한국어 분열문의 통사구조와 생략이론
Syntactic Structures of Korean Clefts and Theories of Ellipsis
1
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a syntactic analysis of Korean cleft constructions. Previousstudies on clefts can be divided into two groups; one is a base-generationapproach (Hoji 1990, Sohn 2001, Kizu 2005, Kang 2006, etc.) and the otheris a movement approach (Hiraiwa & Ishihara 2002, Kim & Lee 2008, Choi2011, etc.). Both approaches, however, are found to have problems inaccounting for restrictions of NPI or structural case in Korean clefts. Thispaper presents an alternative analysis for Korean cleft, according to which afocus constituent, which precedes ita ‘be’, is adjoined to a null CP. Asemantic interpretation of the null CP is restored by copying its antecedenttopic CP at LF. Given the discussions that there exist ellipsis constructions inKorean which involve PF-deletion such as fragments (Kim 1997, Park 2005,Ahn & Cho 2012, etc.), the discussions in this paper identify the existence of(at least) two distinct types of ellipsis constructions, which divulge dependingon whether LF-copying or PF-deletion is employed.
Abstract
This paper presents a syntactic analysis of Korean cleft constructions. Previousstudies on clefts can be divided into two groups; one is a base-generationapproach (Hoji 1990, Sohn 2001, Kizu 2005, Kang 2006, etc.) and the otheris a movement approach (Hiraiwa & Ishihara 2002, Kim & Lee 2008, Choi2011, etc.). Both approaches, however, are found to have problems inaccounting for restrictions of NPI or structural case in Korean clefts. Thispaper presents an alternative analysis for Korean cleft, according to which afocus constituent, which precedes ita ‘be’, is adjoined to a null CP. Asemantic interpretation of the null CP is restored by copying its antecedenttopic CP at LF. Given the discussions that there exist ellipsis constructions inKorean which involve PF-deletion such as fragments (Kim 1997, Park 2005,Ahn & Cho 2012, etc.), the discussions in this paper identify the existence of(at least) two distinct types of ellipsis constructions, which divulge dependingon whether LF-copying or PF-deletion is employed.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김선웅, "특정성과 서술성의 통사론: 영어와 한국어의 (‘것'-)분열문을 중심으로", 언어학, 18(3), pp.167~185 (2010), 대한언어학회
- 김영희, "쪼갠문의 기능과 통사", 어문학, 69, pp.65~90 (2000)
- 박철우, "국어 분열문의 통사 구조", 한말연구, 7(22), pp.76~96 (2008), 한말연구학회
- 임규홍, "국어 분열문에 관한 연구", 어문학, 48, pp.155~175 (1986)
- 최기용, "한국어 격과 조사의 생성통사론" (2009), 한국문화사
- 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.21~47 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 격조사 탈락과 격조사 부재", 프랑스어문교육, 29(18), pp.295~314 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- Abe, J, "Scrambling and Operator Movement", 석사, pp.2005
- Hee-Don Ahn, "Layered Nominal Structures: Implications for Caseless Nominals", 언어, 31(2), pp.165~185 (2006), 한국언어학회
- 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Fragments vs. Null Arguments in Korean", Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.369~387 (2012)
- Cho, Sungdai, "Clefts in Japanese and Korean", CLS, 44(1), pp.61~77 (2008)
- Fiengo, R, "Indices Identity" (1994), MIT Press
- Fox, D, "Successive Cyclic Movement and Island Repair", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.143~154 (2003)
- Fukaya, T, "Sluicing: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives", pp.123~163 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Fukaya, T, "Stripping and Sluicing in Japanese and its Implications", WCCFL, 18 (1999)
- Hankamer, J, "Deep and Surface Anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~428 (1976)
- Hiraiwa, K, "Missing Links : Clefts, Sluicing and"no da"Construction in Japanese", MITWPL, 43, pp.35~54 (2002)
- Hoji, H, "Theories of Anaphora and Aspects of Japanese Syntax", 석사, pp.1990
- Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed Nominalizations in Korean", 박사, pp.1994
- Kang, Bosook, "Some Peculiarities of Korean kes Cleft Constructions", Studia Linguistica, 60, pp.251~281 (2006)
- Kim, "Why Multiple Clefts are Disallowed", WCCFL, 26 (2008)
- Kizu, M, "Cleft Constructions in Japanese Syntax" (2005), Palgrave Macmillan
- Li, A, "Beyond Empty Categories", Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, 254, pp.74~106 (2007)
- Merchant, J, "The Syntax of Silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J, "Variable Island Repair under Ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Müller, G, "A Constraint on Remnant Movement", NLLT, 14, pp.355~407 (1996)
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Island-Insensitive Fragment Answers in Korean", WCCFL, 24, pp.317~325 (2005)
- 이정식, "Chung (2012)에 대한 회답: 국어 동사전 동사후요서 간의 비대칭성에 관하여", 생성문법연구, 23(2), pp.171~198 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- 박소영, "Polarity Mismatches in Korean Fragments", 생성문법연구, 23(4), pp.867~881 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope and Economy", 박사, pp.1995
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof", Studies in Generative Grammar, 14, pp.561~571 (2001)
- Takahashi, D, "Apparent Parasitic Gaps and Null Arguments in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, pp.1~35 (2006)
- Ueyama, A, "Two Types of Scrambling Constructions in Japanese" (1999), A Reference Guide