본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)

조성은|안희돈
한국생성문법학회|2019.08|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제29권 제3호|pp. 571-590|DOI 10.15860/sigg.29.3.201908.571

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

multiple fragmentscase-marked fragmentcaseless fragmentcopula constructionbi-clause analysis
주제분류언어학

초록

Ahn & Cho (2017a) suggests that multiple fragments consist of two clauses plus additional ellipsis. Two important claims are as follows. First, prior to ellipsis, the sentential source can be a syntactically and semantically complete answer to the question. Second, island violation is not repaired by ellipsis. Based on these, Ahn & Cho (2017a-c) account for ill-formed examples related to multiple fragments. Recently, Chung (2019) discusses problems that the bi-clausal analysis of multiple fragments may have. This squib critically reviews the defects pointed out by Chung (2019) and attempts to show that they are not real. This squib also provides further evidence for the no-repair-by-ellipsis analysis of multiple fragments in Korean.

Abstract

Ahn & Cho (2017a) suggests that multiple fragments consist of two clauses plus additional ellipsis. Two important claims are as follows. First, prior to ellipsis, the sentential source can be a syntactically and semantically complete answer to the question. Second, island violation is not repaired by ellipsis. Based on these, Ahn & Cho (2017a-c) account for ill-formed examples related to multiple fragments. Recently, Chung (2019) discusses problems that the bi-clausal analysis of multiple fragments may have. This squib critically reviews the defects pointed out by Chung (2019) and attempts to show that they are not real. This squib also provides further evidence for the no-repair-by-ellipsis analysis of multiple fragments in Korean.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Ahn, Hee-Don, (2012), Hankuk Mwunhwasa
  2. 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  3. 안희돈, "Cyclic Linearization Analysis of Predicate Fronting", 현대문법연구, (54), pp.57~82 (2008), 현대문법학회
  4. Ahn, Hee-Don, "Selected papers from the 2006 Cyprus syntaxfest", pp.29~62 (2006), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  5. 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (70), pp.25~47 (2012), 현대문법학회
  6. Ahn, Hee-Don, "On two types of fragments in Korean", Paper presented at Language and Information Society (2014)
  7. 안희돈, "Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.427~446 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  8. 안희돈, "A Uniform Analysis of Right Dislocation: A Reply to Ko (2016)", 어학연구, 52(2), pp.213~245 (2016), 언어교육원
  9. 안희돈, "A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  10. 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications", 어학연구, 53(2), pp.247~286 (2017), 언어교육원
  11. 안희돈, "A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.311~359 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  12. Ahn, Hee-Don, "On apparent violation on left branch condition", Paper presented at Dongguk Occasional Seminar on Clefts (2019), Dongguk University
  13. Baker, Mark, "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
  14. 정대호, "Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean", 생성문법연구, 29(2), pp.259~278 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  15. 정대호, "On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.573~606 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  16. Den Dikken, Marcel, "Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion and copulas" (2006), MIT Press
  17. Chung-hye Han, "Double relative clauses in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
  18. "Studies in Generative Grammar", 1994, 1~43
  19. 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.275~310 (2014), 언어교육원
  20. Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  21. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
  22. Morgan, Jason, "Sentence fragments revisited", CLS, 25, pp.228~241 (1989)
  23. Dennis Ott, "Right-dislocation as deletion", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(2), pp.641~690 (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  24. Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", Ph.D, pp.2005
  25. 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  26. 박명관, "Pre", postposition Stranding under Sluicing and the Identity Condition on Ellipsis, 2014, pp.(78), 1~19[DOI]
  27. "Studies in Generative Grammar", 2000, 267~294
  28. 위혜경, "Three Types of Fragment", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.255~280 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  29. 윤정회, "Bare Fragment Answers as Elliptical Pseudoclefts", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.365~384 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses박범식, 오세랑한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2014 · 제24권 제1호Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean정대호한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2019 · 제29권 제2호A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments안희돈, 조성은한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2017 · 제27권 제1호Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)안희돈, 조성은한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제2호Notes on Fragments with Tag Questions in English and Korean안희돈, 조성은한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2018 · 제28권 제1호On Island Sensitivity in Fragment Answers손근원한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2018 · 제33권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Modalized Questions in Korean강아름, 윤수원pp. 459-483명사 후 분류사 구문의 구조홍용철pp. 485-515영어 사역동사 make의 통사구조에 관한 연구백다윤pp. 517-533The Strategy of Remnant Extraction in English Pseudogapping최선주, 박명관pp. 535-550Scope Economy in Right Node Raising박범식pp. 551-569
원문 보기