영논항의 비엄밀해석: 유연 영주제어 분석의 증거이자 pro 분석의 반대증거
Interpretations of Null Arguments: Evidence for a Flexible Null Topic Analysis and against a pro Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We present, in this paper, a set of data showing that in the environment where non-strict, i.e. sloppy or indefinite, interpretations of null arguments are observed, overt pronouns do not yield the same interpretations. The data argue against pro Analysis since the analysis assumes that null arguments are silent forms of overt pronouns. On the other hand, we show that when a generic topic appears in the same data, its null argument variable can have a sloppy or indefinite interpretation while its overt pronoun variable does not have it. We then claim that, given that null topics are allowed in languages like Korean, the non-strict interpretations of null arguments can be accounted for by Flexible Null Topic Analysis, which assumes that null arguments are variables of null topics.
Abstract
We present, in this paper, a set of data showing that in the environment where non-strict, i.e. sloppy or indefinite, interpretations of null arguments are observed, overt pronouns do not yield the same interpretations. The data argue against pro Analysis since the analysis assumes that null arguments are silent forms of overt pronouns. On the other hand, we show that when a generic topic appears in the same data, its null argument variable can have a sloppy or indefinite interpretation while its overt pronoun variable does not have it. We then claim that, given that null topics are allowed in languages like Korean, the non-strict interpretations of null arguments can be accounted for by Flexible Null Topic Analysis, which assumes that null arguments are variables of null topics.
참고문헌 (34)
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "cokakmwunyenkwu -yengewa hankwukelul cwungsimulo- (Two Types of Fragments in English and Korean)" (2012), Hankuk Publishing Co
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "More on the Absence of CP Ellipsis: A Reply to Park (2009)", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.137~148 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)", 언어, 36(2), pp.457~471 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "On Null Arguments and Clausal Ellipsis in Korean", 언어와언어학, (57), pp.95~124 (2012), 언어연구소
- 안희돈, "On Apparent Problems of Pro Analysis of Null Argument", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.511~526 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "영논항의 pro(영대명사) 분석 재고", 언어와언어학, (86), pp.85~112 (2019), 언어연구소[DOI]
- 안희돈, "영논항의 대명사 분석에 대한 재고찰", 언어와 정보, 24(1), pp.1~13 (2020), 한국언어정보학회[DOI]
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "hankwuke yengnonhangul ettehkey pol kesinka (How to consider null arguments in Korean)", pp.45~67 (2020), Youkrack Publishing Co
- 안덕호, "NP-Ellipsis, Its Impostors, and Minor Argument Pronominalization in Korean", 언어, 37(2), pp.345~356 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Giorgi, Alessandra, "Discourse-oriented Syntax", pp.229~250 (2015), John Benjamins Publishing Co
- Hoji, Hajime, "Null objects and sloppy identity in Japanese", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.127~152 (1998)
- 홍용철, "한국어의 격조사 탈락과 격조사 부재", 프랑스어문교육, (18), pp.295~314 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "(Null) topics and null arguments", Proceedings of the 14th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Three Factors and Syntactic Theory, pp.98~116 (2012), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "Flexible null topic analysis and three types of examples in favor of argument ellipsis analysis", Proceedings of the 2013 Spring Meeting of The Korean Generative Grammar Circle: Minimizing Syntax, pp.67~72 (2013)
- 홍용철, "유연 영 주제어와 영 논항", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.161~186 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 홍용철, "주제어와 연결된 대명사로서의 영 논항", 현대문법연구, (106), pp.1~28 (2020), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Huang, C.-T. James, "Comments on Hasegawa’s paper", Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop Issues on Empty Categories, pp.77~93 (1988), Connecticut Colledge
- Huang, C.-T. James, "Principles and parameters in comparative grammar", pp.56~76 (1991), MIT Press
- 강남길, "Overlapping Reference and the So-called Plural Suffix Tul", 영어영문학연구, 53(1), pp.1~19 (2011), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- Kim, Soowon, "Sloppy", strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis, 1999, pp.8, 255~284
- Lee, Chungmin, "Asymmetry in Grammar", pp.345~371 (2002), John Benjamins
- 이우승, "DP Ellipsis as Independent Phenomena from pro in pro-drop Languages", 언어, 35(4), pp.1009~1029 (2010), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Oku, Satoshi, "The proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguitic Society", the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguitic Society, pp.299~314 (1998)
- Otani, Kazuyo, "V-Raising and VP-Ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.345~358 (1991)
- Pan, Haihua, "A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp.1966~1981 (2008)
- 박명관, "Some Remarks on the Licensing Condition on the Null Argument in Korean (and Japanese)", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.499~514 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 박명관, "동아시아어의 영논항을 다시 생각한다: 조응적 한정 표현으로서의 영논항", 현대문법연구, (104), pp.93~112 (2019), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 박소영, "한국어 명사구 생략의 통사론 -수분류사 구성을 중심으로-", 언어와 정보 사회, 31, pp.391~422 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
- Takahashi, Daiko, "Quantificational null objects and argument ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.307~326 (2008)
- Tomioka, Satoshi, "Remarks on missing arguments in Japanese", Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, 7, pp.251~263 (2014)
- 엄홍준, "한국어에서의 영논항의 본질", 현대문법연구, (63), pp.73~93 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 임창국, "Further Evidence against the pro Analysis of Argument Ellipsis in Korean", 생성문법연구, 30(3), pp.433~446 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]