On Sloppy-like Interpretation of Null Arguments
2
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to show that what are considered to be apparent sloppy readings in the null argument construction in Korean and Japanese are well accounted for under Ahn & Cho’s (2009, 2010, 2011b,c) pro analysis. The environments where such readings arise are categorized into five types. First, the antecedent noun includes either a reflexive possessor or a numeral quantifier. Second, the antecedent noun is a universal quantifier. Third, the antecedent noun includes a reflexive possessor and it denotes plural entities. Fourth, the antecedent is a negative polarity item. Fifth, the antecedent itself is a reflexive pronoun. By exploring these five cases, we show how far the possible interpretation of pro is stretched. We also show that our pro analysis is conceptually superior to the one that assumes an additional parameter plus pro drop parameter such as the agreement parameter that correlates with the presence or absence of DP ellipsis.
Abstract
This paper aims to show that what are considered to be apparent sloppy readings in the null argument construction in Korean and Japanese are well accounted for under Ahn & Cho’s (2009, 2010, 2011b,c) pro analysis. The environments where such readings arise are categorized into five types. First, the antecedent noun includes either a reflexive possessor or a numeral quantifier. Second, the antecedent noun is a universal quantifier. Third, the antecedent noun includes a reflexive possessor and it denotes plural entities. Fourth, the antecedent is a negative polarity item. Fifth, the antecedent itself is a reflexive pronoun. By exploring these five cases, we show how far the possible interpretation of pro is stretched. We also show that our pro analysis is conceptually superior to the one that assumes an additional parameter plus pro drop parameter such as the agreement parameter that correlates with the presence or absence of DP ellipsis.
참고문헌 (30)
- Agerri, R, "Pragmatically determined aspects of meaning; explicature, impliciture or implicature", ~ (2004)
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회
- 안희돈, "More on the Absence of CP Ellipsis: A Reply to Park (2009)", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.137~148 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 안희돈, "Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)", 언어, 36(2), pp.457~471 (2011), 한국언어학회
- 안희돈, "Notes on the Absence of CP Ellipsis in Japanese and Korean: A Reply to Saito (2007)", 현대문법연구, (65), pp.145~170 (2011), 현대문법학회
- Bach, E, "“Sloppy identity”: an necessary and insufficient criterion for deletion rules", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.609~614 (1974)
- Bresnan, J, "Notes on the notion 'identity of sense anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.589~597 (1971)
- Cho,D.-I, "Anaphor and pronominal", Language Research, 32, pp.621~635 (1996)
- Fiengo, R, "Indices and identity" (1994), MIT Press
- Hankamer, J, "Deep and surface Anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~428 (1976)
- Hoji,H, "Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.127~152 (1998)
- Houser,J, "The syntax and semantics of do so anaphora", 박사, pp.2010
- Huang, C.-T. J, "Remarks on empty categories in Chinese", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.321~337 (1987)
- 이우승, "DP Ellipsis as Independent Phenomena from pro in pro-drop Languages", 언어, 35(4), pp.1009~1029 (2010), 한국언어학회
- Kang,N.-K, "Pronoun, reflexives and sloppy identity", The Jungang Journal of English Linguistics and Literature, 51, pp.1~18 (2009)
- 강남길, "Overlapping Reference and the So-called Plural Suffix Tul", 영어영문학연구, 53(1), pp.1~19 (2011), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Kim, S, "Sloppy", strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis, 1999, pp.8, 255~284
- Merchant, J, "The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University
- 문귀선, "영논항의 속성 재조명", 언어학, 18(1), pp.67~92 (2010), 대한언어학회
- Park.M, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal Inflection", 박사, pp.1994
- Oku,S, "LF copy analysis of Japanese null arguments", In Proceedings of CLS, 34, pp.299~314 (1998)
- Otani, K, "V-raising and VP-ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.345~358 (1991)
- Reinhart,T, "Anaphora and semantic interpretation" (1983), Croom Helm
- 사이토 마모루, "일본어 분열문에서의 생략과 대명사 지시", 현대문법연구, 36(36), pp.1~44 (2004), 현대문법학회
- Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
- Shopen,T, "A generative theory of ellipsis", 박사, pp.1972
- Sperber, D, "Relevance: Communication and Cognition" (1986), Blackwell
- Takahashi,D, "Noun phrase ellipsis ,in:The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics", pp.394~422 (2008), Oxford University
- 엄홍준, "한국어에서의 영논항의 본질", 현대문법연구, 63(63), pp.73~93 (2011), 현대문법학회