본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Technology-Enhanced Feedback on Student Writing in the English-Medium Instruction Classroom

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

High quality and timely assessment feedback is central to student learning in higher education; however, written feedback has many limitations. One of the innovative approaches to delivering feedback to EFL learners is individualized audio-visual feedback (AVF) using screencast technology. Previous research on AVF has been extensively descriptive and mostly focused on student preferences for feedback and evaluation of various screencast software. The present study employed a mixed-method design using pre-post writing tasks and pre-post questionnaires to investigate what particularly beneficial affordances this type of media-rich feedback might offer for writers in the English-Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom, to identify the effects of AVF on changes in learners’ motivation, and to explore students’ perceptions towards screencast feedback. The results suggest that AVF is positively received by EFL learners and that simultaneous visual cues and detailed explanations promote better understanding, engagement, and active listening. In addition, AVF significantly improves learners’ writing performance and academic motivation. The paper concludes with practical implications and suggestions for further research

Abstract

High quality and timely assessment feedback is central to student learning in higher education; however, written feedback has many limitations. One of the innovative approaches to delivering feedback to EFL learners is individualized audio-visual feedback (AVF) using screencast technology. Previous research on AVF has been extensively descriptive and mostly focused on student preferences for feedback and evaluation of various screencast software. The present study employed a mixed-method design using pre-post writing tasks and pre-post questionnaires to investigate what particularly beneficial affordances this type of media-rich feedback might offer for writers in the English-Medium Instruction (EMI) classroom, to identify the effects of AVF on changes in learners’ motivation, and to explore students’ perceptions towards screencast feedback. The results suggest that AVF is positively received by EFL learners and that simultaneous visual cues and detailed explanations promote better understanding, engagement, and active listening. In addition, AVF significantly improves learners’ writing performance and academic motivation. The paper concludes with practical implications and suggestions for further research

참고문헌 (60)

  1. "Best business schools" (2018)[URL]
  2. Alderman, M. K., "Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning" (2013), Routledge
  3. Ali, A. D., "Effectiveness of using screencast feedback on EFL students’ writing and perception", English Language Teaching, 9(8), pp.106~121 (2016)
  4. Anson, C. M., "Students’ perceptions of oral screencast responses to their writing : Exploring digitally mediated identities", Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(3), pp.378~411 (2016)
  5. Black, P., "Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education : Principles", Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp.7~74 (1998)
  6. Boud, D., "Feedback in higher and professional education", pp.1~10 (2012), Routledge
  7. Brown, H., "CBI, CLIL, & EMI: Differing approaches and goals", Poster session presented at JALT 2016: Transformation in Language Education. 42nd Annual International Conference on Language Teaching and Learning & Educational Materials Exhibition (2016)
  8. Byun, K., "Exploring effective strategies to implement EMI: Case studies of two Korean universities", Report of the Hiroshima International Seminar on Higher Education, 21, pp.45~59 (2014)
  9. Carless, D., "Differing perceptions in the feedback process", Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.219~233 (2006)
  10. Carvalho, C., "Teacher feedback : Educational guidance in different school contexts", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, pp.219~223 (2014)
  11. Chanock, K., "Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write?", Teaching in Higher Education, 5, pp.95~105 (2000)
  12. Cho, D. W., "English-medium instruction in the university context of Korea : Tradeoff between teaching outcomes and media-initiated university ranking", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(4), pp.135~163 (2012)
  13. Cranny, D., "Screencasting, a tool to facilitate engagement with formative feedback?", All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE-J), 8(3), pp.2911~2937 (2016)
  14. Crisp, B. R., "Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), pp.571~581 (2007)
  15. Crook, A., "The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?", Computers and Education, 58(1), pp.386~396 (2012)
  16. Cunningham, M. A., "Using audio screencast for feedback on short written essays", doctoral, pp.2015
  17. David, F., "Assessment and accreditation processes: Contribution to improve a quality assurance system of higher education in Portugal", INTED 2014Conference Proceedings, pp.272~281 (2016), IATED Academy
  18. Dörnyei, Z., "Motivational strategies in the language classroom" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  19. Duncan, T. G., "The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire", Educational Psychologist, 40(2), pp.117~128 (2005)
  20. "Mind the gap... between grad skills and employer expectations" (2014)[URL]
  21. Edwards, K., "Screencast feedback for essays on a distance learning MA in professional communication", Journal of Academic Writing, 2(1), pp.95~126 (2012)
  22. Evans, N. W., "The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners", System, 39(2), pp.229~239 (2011)
  23. González, J. M., "Overlapping of ESP", EAP and content courses revisited, 2012, 213~236
  24. Gould, J., "Hearing you loud and clear : student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), pp.554~566 (2013)
  25. "What is Grammarly Premium?" (2018)[URL]
  26. Han, Y., "Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom", Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, pp.31~44 (2015)
  27. Harper, F., "Evaluating the integration of Jing®screencasts in feedback on written assignments", ICL 2012 Conference Proceedings, pp.346~351 (2012), IEEE
  28. Hase, S., "Videomail : A personalised approach to providing feedback on assessment to distance learners", Distance Education, 18(2), pp.361~368 (1997)
  29. Henderson, M., "Technology enhanced feedback on assessment", Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2014 (2014)
  30. Henderson, M., "Video-based feedback on student assessment : Scarily personal", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), pp.51~66 (2015)
  31. Hyland, K., "Feedback on second language students’ writing", Language Teaching, 39(2), pp.83~101 (2006)
  32. Jonsson, A., "Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education", Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), pp.63~76 (2013)
  33. Kim, E. G., "English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific", pp.53~69 (2017), Springer
  34. Knauf, H., "Reading, listening and feeling : Audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), pp.442~449 (2016)
  35. 김인영, "Students’ Perceptions of EMI in Higher Education in Korea", Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(2), pp.35~61 (2014), 아시아테플
  36. Lee, E. J. E., "Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students", System, 41(2), pp.217~230 (2013)
  37. Gyungsook Jane Lee, "Why Students Don’t Participate in English Medium Instruction Classes in a Korean University: A Case Study", 영어교육, 69(1), pp.91~117 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  38. Lee, G., "Brain Korea 21 : A development-oriented national policy in Korean higher education", International Higher Education, 19, pp.24~25 (2015)
  39. Lee, G., "Pedagogic challenges of English-mediated instruction in the Korean EFL context", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), pp.217~224 (2018)
  40. Lunt, T., ""Are you listening please?"The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), pp.759~769 (2010)
  41. Lyster, R., "Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms", Language teaching, 46(1), pp.1~40 (2013)
  42. Merry, S., "Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files", Bioscience Education, 11(1), pp.1~11 (2008)
  43. Middleton, A., "The changing face of feedback—how staff are using mediaenhanced feedback", Educational Developments, 12(3), pp.25~27 (2011)
  44. Molloy, E., "Feedback in higher and professional education", pp.11~33 (2013), Routledge
  45. Nicol, D., "Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback", pp.197~224 (2014), Edinburgh University Press
  46. MURPHY ODO DENNIS, "Engaging in Computer-Mediated Feedback in Academic Writing: Voices from L2 Doctoral Students in TESOL", 영어교육, 69(3), pp.129~150 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  47. Olesova, L. A., "An examination of the effectiveness of embedded audio feedback for English as a foreign language students in asynchronous online discussions", doctoral, pp.2011
  48. Orsmond, P., "Feedback alignment : effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), pp.125~136 (2011)
  49. Perkoski, R., "The impact of multimedia feedback on student perceptions: Video screencast with audio compared to text based email", doctoral, pp.2017
  50. Petty, T., "Motivating first-generation students to academic success and college completion", College Student Journal, 48(1), pp.133~140 (2014)
  51. Pintrich, P. R., "A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)" (1991), University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning
  52. Pintrich, P. R., "Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications" (1995), Prentice Hall
  53. Rønsen, A. K., "What teachers say and what students perceive : Interpretations of feedback in teacher-student assessment dialogues", Education Inquiry, 4(3), pp.537~553 (2013)
  54. "Screencast-O-Matic" (2018)[URL]
  55. Séror, J., "In the classroom show me! Enhanced feedback through screencasting technology", TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), pp.104~116 (2013)
  56. Shin, J. C., "Building world-class research university : The Brain Korea 21 project", Higher Education, 58(5), pp.669~688 (2009)
  57. Stannard, R., "Digital language learning and teaching: Research, theory, and practice", pp.179~187 (2017), Routledge
  58. Thompson, R., "Talking with students through screencasting : Experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning", The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 1(1), pp.1~16 (2012)
  59. West, J., "Enhancing the assessment experience : Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), pp.400~410 (2016)
  60. Woodard, W. J., "Teaching techniques : Audiovisual feedback in EFL", ESL writing classes, 2016, pp.54(2), 29~32

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)