본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Facilitative Effects of Feedback Delivered via a Social Q&A Platform in the English-Medium Instruction Context

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

English is becoming the global language of business, education, science and scholarship, and English- medium instruction (EMI) in higher education is a rapidly growing, multidimensional global phenomenon. Previous research on EMI has predominantly highlighted the forces driving this phenomenon, implementation challenges, and stakeholders’ language proficiency and attitudes, while very few studies have discussed changes in pedagogical practices to improve the quality of EMI at the micro level, particularly in the Asian context. This article investigates the effects of formative feedback delivered via a social Q&A online platform on learners’ performance and motivation and explores students’ perceptions of the use of the platform. It analysed pre-test, post-test, and questionnaire data from 130 students enrolled in an English-mediated business course at an EMI university in South Korea. These data were supplemented by the focus-group interview with eight students. The findings suggested that the application of the platform was viewed favourably by the students and that technology-mediated feedback significantly enhanced their writing performance and motivation, increased their language and content knowledge, and supported their active engagement. The findings have several pedagogical implications for other EMI contexts.

Abstract

English is becoming the global language of business, education, science and scholarship, and English- medium instruction (EMI) in higher education is a rapidly growing, multidimensional global phenomenon. Previous research on EMI has predominantly highlighted the forces driving this phenomenon, implementation challenges, and stakeholders’ language proficiency and attitudes, while very few studies have discussed changes in pedagogical practices to improve the quality of EMI at the micro level, particularly in the Asian context. This article investigates the effects of formative feedback delivered via a social Q&A online platform on learners’ performance and motivation and explores students’ perceptions of the use of the platform. It analysed pre-test, post-test, and questionnaire data from 130 students enrolled in an English-mediated business course at an EMI university in South Korea. These data were supplemented by the focus-group interview with eight students. The findings suggested that the application of the platform was viewed favourably by the students and that technology-mediated feedback significantly enhanced their writing performance and motivation, increased their language and content knowledge, and supported their active engagement. The findings have several pedagogical implications for other EMI contexts.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Aizawa, I., "Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency, linguistic challenges, and academic language skills of Japanese students in an English medium instruction programme", Language Teaching Research (2020)[DOI]
  2. Alsamadani, H. A., "The effectiveness of using online blogging for students’ individual and group writing", International Education Studies, 11(1), pp.44~51 (2017)[DOI]
  3. Awidi, I. T., "Facebook group in the learning design of a higher education course: An analysis of factors influencing positive learning experience for students", Computers & Education, 129, pp.106~121 (2019)[DOI]
  4. Bailey, D. R., "The effects of online collaborative writing and TOEIC writing testpreparation on L2 writing performance", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), pp.383~397 (2018)[DOI]
  5. Blooma, M. J., "Social question answering: Analyzing knowledge, cognitive processes and social dimensions of micro-collaborations", Computers and Education, 69, pp.109~120 (2013)[DOI]
  6. Boud, D., "Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well", pp.1~10 (2013), Routledge
  7. Brown, A., "CHE principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semistructured interviews in educational research", International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), pp.76~90 (2019)[DOI]
  8. Carless, D., "Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: A need for teacherstudent partnerships", Higher Education Research and Development, 39(3), pp.425~438 (2020)[DOI]
  9. Carless, D., "Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy", Teaching in Higher Education (2020)[DOI]
  10. Chen, H., "An investigation of lecturers’ teaching through English medium of instruction-a case of higher education in China", Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10) (2020)[DOI]
  11. I-Chia Chou, "Helping Students Learn in EMI Courses Using Reciprocal Teaching: A Case Study of a Taiwan University", Asian Education Studies, 1(2), pp.37~ (2016), July Press Pte. Ltd.[DOI]
  12. Creswell, J. W., "Designing and conducting mixed methods research" (2007), Sage Publications
  13. Dafouz, E., "English-medium instruction and teacher education programmes in higher education:ideological forces and imagined identities at work", International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), pp.540~552 (2018)[DOI]
  14. Dearden, J., "English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon" (2015), British Council
  15. Dewey J, "How we think" (1933), Heath & Co
  16. Duong, V. A., "English as a symbol of internationalization in higher education: A case study of Vietnam", Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), pp.669~683 (2016)[DOI]
  17. Fenton-Smith, B., "English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy" (2017), Springer
  18. Gibbs, G., "Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning", Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), pp.3~31 (2005)
  19. Grasso, S. J. M., "Use of a social question answering application in a face-to-face college biology class", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), pp.212~227 (2017)[DOI]
  20. Hast, M., "Higher education in times of Covid-19: Giving online feedback implementation another look", Higher Education Studies, 11(1) (2020)[DOI]
  21. Hattie, J., "The power of feedback", Review of Educational Research, 77(1), pp.81~112 (2007)[DOI]
  22. Henderson, M., "The challenges of feedback in higher education", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), pp.1237~1252 (2019)[DOI]
  23. Hershkovitz, A., "Students’ perceptions of benefits and drawbacks of Facebook-connections with teachers", Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 15, pp.1~20 (2019)[DOI]
  24. Guangwei Hu, "English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education: Lessons from China", Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), pp.1~11 (2019), 아시아테플
  25. Hultgren, A., "English-medium instruction in European higher education: English in Europe Vol. 3", pp.1~16 (2015), De Gruyter Mouton
  26. Hyland, K., "Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), pp.240~253 (2013)[DOI]
  27. Jeong, K. O., "A study on the integration of google docs as a web-based collaborative learning platform in EFL writing instruction", Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39) (2016)[DOI]
  28. 김은경, "Korean Engineering Professors’ Views on English Language Education in Relation to English-Medium Instruction", Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(2), pp.1~33 (2014), 아시아테플
  29. Kim, E. G., "English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific: From policy to pedagogy", pp.53~69 (2017), Springer
  30. Kim, J., "Rediscovering feedback and experiential learning in the English-medium instruction classroom", Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4) (2021)[DOI]
  31. Kim, J., "English-medium instruction and intercultural sensitivity: A Korean case study", Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(5), pp.467~482 (2017)[DOI]
  32. 김빅토리아, "Technology-Enhanced Feedback on Student Writing in the English-Medium Instruction Classroom", 영어교육, 73(4), pp.29~53 (2018), 한국영어교육학회
  33. Kokoç, M., "Flexibility in e-Learning: Modelling its relation to behavioural engagement and academic performance", Themes in eLearning, 12(12), pp.1~16 (2019)
  34. Kong, S. C., "Delivery and evaluation of an e-Learning framework through computer-aided analysis of learners’ reflection text in a teacher development course", Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(28) (2021)[DOI]
  35. Koo, T. K., "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), pp.155~163 (2016)[DOI]
  36. Lange, D., "Second language teacher education", pp.245~268 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  37. Lasagabaster, D., "Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level", Language Teaching, 51(3), pp.400~416 (2018)[DOI]
  38. Macaro, E., "English medium instruction" (2018), Oxford University Pres
  39. Macaro, E., "English medium instruction in China’s higher education: Teachers’ perspectives of competencies, certification and professional development", Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(3), pp.219~231 (2020)[DOI]
  40. Odo, D. M., "An action research investigation of the impact of using online feedback videos to promote self-reflection on the microteaching of preservice EFL teachers", Systemic Practice and Action Research, pp.1~17 (2021)[DOI]
  41. "Our story" (2022)[URL]
  42. Santos, J. L. G. D., "Integrating quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research", Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 26(3) (2017)[DOI]
  43. Sarkar, N., "Engaging digital natives through social learning", Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 15(2), pp.1~4 (2017)
  44. Schön, D., "The reflective practitioner" (1983), Basic Books
  45. Soffer, T., "Patterns of students’ utilization of flexibility in online academic courses and their relation to course achievement", The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), pp.202~220 (2019)[DOI]
  46. Stewart, D. W., "Focus groups: Theory and practice Vol. 20" (2014), Sage Publications
  47. Timmis, S., "Rethinking assessment in a digital age:Opportunities, challenges and risks", British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), pp.454~476 (2016)[DOI]
  48. Vivekananthamoorthy, N., "Driving success in e-learning portals:Piazza, a multi-faculty collaborative model", International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 14(2), pp.31~49 (2019)[DOI]
  49. Walkinshaw, I., "English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific", pp.1~18 (2017), Springer
  50. Werther, C., "Using English as a medium of instruction at university level in Denmark: the lecturer’s perspective", Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35(5), pp.443~462 (2014)[DOI]
  51. Winstone, N., "Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach" (2019), Routledge
  52. Yang, S. H., "Investigating teacher learning using a web-based writing platform", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), pp.78~97 (2018)[DOI]
  53. Zhan, Y., "Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons", Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), pp.973~986 (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)