Integration of Computerized Feedback to Improve Interactive Use of Written Feedback in English Writing Class
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
How can an automated essay scoring (AES) program, which provides feedback for essays, be a formative tool for improving ESL writing? In spite of the increasing demands for English writing proficiency, English writing instruction has not been effective for teaching and learning because of a lack of timely and accurate feedback. In this context, AES as a possible solution has been gaining the attention of educators and scholars in ESL/EFL writing education because it can provide consistent and prompt feedback for student writers. This experimental study examined the impact of different types of feedback for a college ESL writing program using the Criterion AES system. The results reveal the positive impact of AES in a college-level ESL course and differences between the teacher’s feedback and the AES feedback. The findings suggest that AES can be effectively integrated into ESL writing instruction as a formative assessment tool.
Abstract
How can an automated essay scoring (AES) program, which provides feedback for essays, be a formative tool for improving ESL writing? In spite of the increasing demands for English writing proficiency, English writing instruction has not been effective for teaching and learning because of a lack of timely and accurate feedback. In this context, AES as a possible solution has been gaining the attention of educators and scholars in ESL/EFL writing education because it can provide consistent and prompt feedback for student writers. This experimental study examined the impact of different types of feedback for a college ESL writing program using the Criterion AES system. The results reveal the positive impact of AES in a college-level ESL course and differences between the teacher’s feedback and the AES feedback. The findings suggest that AES can be effectively integrated into ESL writing instruction as a formative assessment tool.
참고문헌 (35)
- Attali,Y, "Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion", Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2004)
- Attali, Y., "Automated essay scoring with e-rater v. 2", Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3), pp.1~31 (2006)
- Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), pp.191~205 (2005)
- Blake,R, "Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage", Learning & Technology, 4(1), pp.120~136 (2000)
- Bransford, J. D., "How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded Edition" (2000), National Academies Press
- Brown,H.D, "Principles of language teaching and learning" (2000), Longman
- Burstein,J, "The e-rater scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing, In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective", pp.113~121 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Cowie,N, "Students of Process Writing Need Appropriate and Timely Feedback on Their Work, and In Addition, Training in Dealing with That Feedback", Saitama University Review, 31(1), pp.181~194 (1995)
- Crystal,D, "English as a global language" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Dikli,S, "An overview of automated scoring of essays", Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(1), pp.2006~2012 (2006)
- Dikli,S, "Automated essay scoring in an English as a second language setting", 박사, pp.2007
- Elliot,S, "IntelliMetric: From here to validity, In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective", pp.71~86 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Elliot, S., "The impact of MY Access!™ use on student writing performance: A technology overview and four studies", Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2004)
- Fathman, A., "Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris,D, "Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.33~53 (1995)
- Ferris, D, "The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), pp.1~11 (1996)
- Ferris,D, "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?(and what do we do in the meantime…?)", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), pp.49~62 (2004)
- Ferris, D. R., "Perspectives, problems, and practices in treating written error", Colloquium presented at International TESOL Convention (2000)
- Ferris, D., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), pp.161~184 (2001)
- Ferris,D, "Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and between-pre-and-post-test effects of written error correction, In Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.81~104 (2006)
- Keith,T.Z, "Validity of automated essay scoring systems, In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective", pp.147~167 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Kepner,C.G, "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills", The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), pp.305~313 (1991)
- Lee,I, "ESL Learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching", System, 25(4), pp.465~477 (1997)
- Page,E.B, "Project essay grade: PEG, In Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective", pp.43~54 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Schulz,R.A, "Cultural Differences in Student and Teacher Perceptions concerning the Role of Grammar Instruction and Corrective Feedback: USAColombia", The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), pp.244~258 (2001)
- Semke,H.D, "Effects of the red pen", Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), pp.195~202 (1984)
- Sheppard,K, "Two feedback types: Do they make a difference", RELC Journal, 23(1), pp.103~110 (1992)
- Shermis, M. D., "Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective" (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Shermis, M. D., "The impact of automated essay scoring on high stakes writing assessments", Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (2004)
- Shermis, M. D., "The Impact of Automated Essay Scoring on Writing Outcomes", Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the National Council on Measurement in Education (2008)
- Silva,T, "Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.11~23 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Truscott,J, "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46, pp.327~369 (1996)
- Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind in society" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Warschauer, M., "Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda", Language Teaching Research, 10(2), pp.1~24 (2006)
- Zamel,V, "Responding to Student Writing", Tesol Quarterly, 19(1), pp.79~101 (1985)