본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Impact of Feedback Combinations from a Teacher, AI, and Self on EFL English Writing and Perceptions via ZOOM

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to investigate the influence of feedback combinations on English writing performance and student perceptions in an online writing course conducted via Zoom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-eight college participants were divided into two groups: a control group of 33 students, who received only AI and teacher feedback during the writing process, and an experimental group of 35 students, who engaged in self-feedback before receiving AI and teacher feedback. To assess the effectiveness of the different types of feedback, students took TOEFL writing test respectively at the beginning and end of the semester. Additionally, to investigate learners’ perceptions towards different types of feedback, a post-questionnaire was administered to capture participants’ thoughts on them. The results revealed that the post-writing performance of both groups showed improvement from the pre-test scores. Notably, the group that received self-feedback demonstrated significant enhancement compared to the group without self-feedback. In addition, the group with self-feedback showed a positive perception towards self-feedback. Subsequently, students expressed their views on the advantages and disadvantages of each feedback. The study highlights the educational implications of using combined feedback methods.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of feedback combinations on English writing performance and student perceptions in an online writing course conducted via Zoom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-eight college participants were divided into two groups: a control group of 33 students, who received only AI and teacher feedback during the writing process, and an experimental group of 35 students, who engaged in self-feedback before receiving AI and teacher feedback. To assess the effectiveness of the different types of feedback, students took TOEFL writing test respectively at the beginning and end of the semester. Additionally, to investigate learners’ perceptions towards different types of feedback, a post-questionnaire was administered to capture participants’ thoughts on them. The results revealed that the post-writing performance of both groups showed improvement from the pre-test scores. Notably, the group that received self-feedback demonstrated significant enhancement compared to the group without self-feedback. In addition, the group with self-feedback showed a positive perception towards self-feedback. Subsequently, students expressed their views on the advantages and disadvantages of each feedback. The study highlights the educational implications of using combined feedback methods.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Amors, M, J., "A new perspective on peer-editing", Foreign Language Annuals, 30(4), pp.513~522 (1997)
  2. Andrade, H., "Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment", Theory into Practice, 48(1), pp.12~19 (2009)[DOI]
  3. Austin, R., "The analysis of grammatical errors on students’ essay writing by using Grammarly", Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency, 4(1), pp.39~46 (2022)[DOI]
  4. Brown, J., "The alternatives in language assessment", TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), pp.653~675 (1998)
  5. Chung, S., "Use of rubric-referenced self-assessment in EFL instruction : A tool for self-regulated learning", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), pp.767~789 (2018)[DOI]
  6. Dale, R., "Checking in on grammar checking", Natural Language Engineering, 22(3), pp.491~495 (2016)[DOI]
  7. Ferris, D., "Preparing teachers to respond to student writing", Journal of Second Language Writting, 16(3), pp.165~193 (2007)
  8. Ferris, D., "Treatment of error in second language student writing" (2011), University of Michigan Press
  9. Ferris, D., "Error feedback in the L2 writing classes : How explicit does it need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp.161~184 (2001)[DOI]
  10. Ghufron, M. A., "The role of Grammarly assessing English as a foreign language(EFL)writing", Lingua Cultura, 12(4), pp.395~403 (2018)[DOI]
  11. Hadiat, A. W. F., "The use of Grammarly to enhance students’ accuracy in writing descriptive text(A case study at eighth grade of a Junior High School in Ciamis)", Journal of English Education Program(JEEP), 9(2), pp.1~10 (2022)[DOI]
  12. Hyland, F., "Focusing on form : student engagement with teacher feedback?", System, 31(2), pp.217~230 (2003)[DOI]
  13. Hyland, K., "Feedback in Second Language Writing" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  14. Im, H., "The use of an online grammar checker in English writing learning", Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(1), pp.51~58 (2021)[DOI]
  15. Ji, N., "Effectiveness of AI editing software for corrective feedback in L2 writing", English Language Assessment, 15(2), pp.31~52 (2020)
  16. Joo, H., "An investigation of the effect of self-correction on error and syntactic complexity of Korean adults’ English writing", English Language Assessment, 15(2), pp.215~233 (2020)[DOI]
  17. Junqueira, L., "I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard : A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices", Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, pp.19~36 (2015)[DOI]
  18. Kang, D., "Feedback on EFL writing : Teacher, peer, and self-review", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2008)
  19. Kim, S., "An error analysis of college students’ writing : Is that really Konglish?", Studies in Modern Grammar, 25, pp.159~174 (2001)
  20. Kim, Y., "Exploring English writing feedback employed Korean collegiate students", The Mirae Journal of English Language and Literature, 18(1), pp.177~205 (2013)
  21. Koo, Jungyeon, "Investigating the reliability of an analytic rubric to score TOEFL independent writing", English21, 35(2), pp.315~355 (2022)[DOI]
  22. Lee, I., "Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts" (2017), Springer
  23. Lee, I., "Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms : An exploratory study", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, pp.72~81 (2019)[DOI]
  24. Lee, Y., "The effects of peer feedback and instructor feedback on college students’ English writing : The writing improvement from different levels, their preference, and affective aspects", Studies in British and American Language and Literature, 140, pp.127~161 (2021)
  25. Lindblom-ylanne, S., "Self-, peer-and teacher-assessment of student essay", The Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching, 7(1), pp.51~62 (2006)[DOI]
  26. Long, R., "Online grammar checkers versus self-editing : An investigation of error correction rates and writing quality", Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(1), pp.441~458 (2022)[DOI]
  27. Mansoor, G., "Teacher-correction, peer-correction and self-correction : Their impacts on Iranian students’ IELTS essay writing performance", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(1), pp.117~139 (2009)
  28. Min, J., "Korean university students’ perceptions of feedback activities on English composition : Self-review, peer feedback, and computer feedback", Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 20(1), pp.335~362 (2020)[DOI]
  29. Mohd, H. M. J., "Using Self-Assessment as a Tool for English Language Learning", English Language Teaching, 12(11), pp.64~73 (2019)[DOI]
  30. Moon, D., "Evaluating corrective feedback generated by an AI-powered online grammar checker", International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 13(4), pp.22~29 (2021)[DOI]
  31. Moon, Y., "The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university", English Teaching, 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
  32. Nazari, N., "Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education : randomized controlled trial", Heliyon, 7(5), pp.1~9 (2021)[DOI]
  33. O’Neill, R., "Stop! Grammar time : University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly", Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), pp.42~56 (2019)[DOI]
  34. Park, C., "The effect of self and peer feedback : Learner autonomy in high school writing classes", Modern English Education, 17(3), pp.53~77 (2016)[DOI]
  35. Park, J., "An AI-based English grammar checker vs. human raters in evaluation EFL learners’ writing", Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), pp.112~131 (2019)
  36. Park, J., "Utilizing an AI-based grammar checker in an EFL writing classroom", Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), pp.97~120 (2020)[DOI]
  37. Raimes, A., "Techniques in Teaching Writing" (1983), Oxford University Press
  38. Sahu, S., "Evaluating performance of different grammar checking tools", International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(2), pp.2227~2233 (2020)[DOI]
  39. Song, E., "The effects of AI grammar checker and self-feedback on English grammar of EFL college students", Journal of Foreign Studies, 57, pp.91~120 (2021)[DOI]
  40. Tompkins, G. E., "Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product" (2008), Pearson Merrill Prentice-Hall
  41. Van Beuningen, C., "Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in Dutch multilingual classrooms", Language Learning, 62, pp.1~41 (2012)[DOI]
  42. Wang, Xiaoran, "Chinese English learner’s perspectives on automated writing feedback", Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), pp.33~58 (2023)[DOI]
  43. Yang, H., "Efficiency of online grammar checker in English writing performance and students’ perceptions", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 18(3), pp.328~348 (2018)[DOI]
  44. Yang, M., "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), pp.179~200 (2006)[DOI]
  45. Zhang, J., "Grammarly vs. face-to-face tutoring at the writing center: ESL student writer’s perceptions", Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 17(2), pp.33~48 (2020)[DOI]
  46. Zhang, Z., "Students engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing", Assessing Writing, 36, pp.90~10 (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)