Exploring the Talk in EFL Students’ Peer Feedback: Content, Perspectives, and Desire
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Peer feedback (PF) can be an important component in teaching and learning writing. This study investigated the content of PF and students’ perspectives about PF in two EFL writing classrooms at a Korean university. The data comprise sixty-five students’ written comments and their opinion writing on PF. The findings reveal that students’ comments included mainly ‘statements’ and ‘praises’ with significant high scores. The strengths of PF were students’ ‘knowledge about concepts’ for getting ideas and recognition of their grammatical problems through peers’ work. Regarding weaknesses of PF, students felt that their peers were not qualified to revise the grammatical aspects and tended to distrust their peers’ recommendations. As an ideal type of feedback, students preferred anonymous PF to teacher feedback. These findings show the importance of choosing not only what ways of PF are effective in a given context, but what effect of the selected way might have on the improvement of students’ writing.
Abstract
Peer feedback (PF) can be an important component in teaching and learning writing. This study investigated the content of PF and students’ perspectives about PF in two EFL writing classrooms at a Korean university. The data comprise sixty-five students’ written comments and their opinion writing on PF. The findings reveal that students’ comments included mainly ‘statements’ and ‘praises’ with significant high scores. The strengths of PF were students’ ‘knowledge about concepts’ for getting ideas and recognition of their grammatical problems through peers’ work. Regarding weaknesses of PF, students felt that their peers were not qualified to revise the grammatical aspects and tended to distrust their peers’ recommendations. As an ideal type of feedback, students preferred anonymous PF to teacher feedback. These findings show the importance of choosing not only what ways of PF are effective in a given context, but what effect of the selected way might have on the improvement of students’ writing.
참고문헌 (50)
- Allaei, S. K., "Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms", The Writing Instructor, 10, pp.19~28 (1990)
- Bell,J.S, "Becoming aware of literacy", 박사, pp.1991
- Berg,E.C, "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Cheng, W., "Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise", Studies in Higher Education, 22, pp.233~239 (1997)
- Cheng, W., "Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project", Teaching in Higher Education, 5, pp.243~255 (2000)
- Cho, K., "Student revision with peer and expert reviewing", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.328~338 (2010)
- Connor, U., "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
- Curtis,A, "“It is better to give than to receive.”: Feedback in student writing" (1997), Paper presented at the World Skills Language and Living Conference
- George,D, "Working with peer groups in the composition classroom", College Composition and Communication, 35, pp.320~326 (1984)
- Gere, A., "Talking about writing: The language of writing groups", Research in the Teaching of English, 19, pp.362~385 (1985)
- Gielen, S., "Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.213~224 (2010)
- Hattie, J., "The power of feedback", Review of Educational Research, 77, pp.81~112 (2007)
- Herrington, A., "Peer review and revising in an anthropology course: Lessons for learning", College Composition and Communication, 42, pp.184~199 (1991)
- Hu,G, "Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers", Language Teaching Research, 9(3), pp.321~342 (2005)
- Kluger, A. N., "The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory", Psychological Bulletin, 119, pp.254~284 (1996)
- Lee,Y, "Alignment and detachments in writing pedagogy: Interface between teachers’ practices and students’ purposes in two EFL writing courses in Korea", 박사, pp.2003
- 이 영 화, "Teacher Responses and Student Interpretations in an EFL Composition Classroom", 영어교육, 62(2), pp.101~121 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
- Leki,I, "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Liu, C. C., "Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: Tools to support conceptual awareness", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, pp.43~59 (2005)
- Lockhart, C., "Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content", Language Learning, 45, pp.605~655 (1995)
- Lundstorm, K., "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, pp.30~43 (2009)
- Mangelsdorf,K, "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think", ELT Journal, 46, pp.274~284 (1992)
- Mendonca, C., "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28, pp.745~769 (1994)
- Mory, E. H, "Feedback research revisited, in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology", pp.745~783 (2004), Erlbaum
- Narciss,S, "Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks, in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology" (2008), Erlbaum
- Narciss, S, "How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning, In Instructional design for multimedia learning", pp.181~195 (2004), Waxmann
- Nelson, G. L., "ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, pp.113~131 (1998)
- Nelson, G. L., "An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.171~193 (1992)
- Nelson, G. L., "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts", TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp.135~142 (1993)
- Pain, R., "Improving geography essay writing using innovative assessment", Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, pp.19~31 (1996)
- Paulus,T.M, "The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
- Poulos, A., "Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, pp.143~154 (2008)
- Prins, F. J., "Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences", Advances in Health Science Education, 11, pp.289~303 (2006)
- Rollinson,P, "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Ryan, W., "Data management and analysis methods, in Handbook of qualitative research", pp.89~108 (2000), Sage
- Saito, H., "Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners", TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), pp.46~70 (1994)
- Scollon,S, "Not to waste words or students: Confucian and Socratic discourse in the tertiary classroom, In Culture in second language teaching and learning" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Shute,V.J, "Focus on formative feedback", Review of Educational Research, 78, pp.153~189 (2008)
- Smith, H., "Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case study from psychology", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, pp.71~81 (2002)
- Stanley,J, "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.217~233 (1992)
- Strijbos, J. W., "Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.201~212 (2010)
- Topping,K, "Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities", Review of Educational Research, 68, pp.249~276 (1998)
- Tsui, A. B. M., "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, pp.147~170 (2000)
- Tuzi,F, "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in and academic writing course", Computers and Composition, 21, pp.217~235 (2004)
- Van Zundert, M., "Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.189~200 (2010)
- Venables, A., "Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), pp.281~290 (2003)
- Villamil, O., "Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, pp.51~75 (1996)
- Zhang,S, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.209~222 (1995)
- Zhu,W, "Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction", Written Communication, 12, pp.492~528 (1995)
- Zhu W, "Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), pp.251~276 (2001)
